Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, Political talk (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/)
-   -   Attention Trump Enthusiasts (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/attention-trump-enthusiasts-184230/)

Guest 03-03-2016 09:58 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1193670)
If one made a list of all the negative Trump allegations one would have a list that accurately describes Obama.

Racist.
Didn't know anything and still doesn't.
All talk and no substance.
Just to name a few.

The Obama supporters are really hamstrung since any and all negatives they can contrive are the assets of Obama.

Obama has done quite a lot of good in his 7.2 or so years in office.

Guest 03-03-2016 10:01 AM

I still think Kasich/Rubio would trounce the Dems in Nov. Trump could be ambassador to Mexico. Cruz could be ambassador to Cuba or Canada, his choice. I'd appoint Sanders ambassador to North Korea, except that he'd probably like it there

Guest 03-03-2016 10:02 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1193673)
Obama has done quite a lot of good in his 7.2 or so years in office.

Name ONE thing

Guest 03-03-2016 10:20 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1193678)
Name ONE thing

Osama bin Laden killed by U.S. forces - May 02, 2011 - HISTORY.com

And the Affordable Care Act. It does have problems still but can be fixed.

His Supreme Court choices.

His last Attorney General pick. The first was pretty bad in just picking a pit bull.

Joe Biden was also a bad pick IMHO. The man is a Cheshire cat as Clint Eastwood pointed out but a very able politician but not much else. He certainly did not get away from DC politics as usual by that VP pick.

Guest 03-03-2016 10:36 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1193685)
Osama bin Laden killed by U.S. forces - May 02, 2011 - HISTORY.com

And the Affordable Care Act. It does have problems still but can be fixed.

His Supreme Court choices.

His last Attorney General pick. The first was pretty bad in just picking a pit bull.

Joe Biden was also a bad pick IMHO. The man is a Cheshire cat as Clint Eastwood pointed out but a very able politician but not much else. He certainly did not get away from DC politics as usual by that VP pick.

Bin Laden was an old useless retiree, not even in the game anymore. Clinton could have had him taken out and would not give the green light for the sniper to take him out.

Obamacare is useless and too expensive. It is Anti-American and the ones that passed it ought to be put in front of a firing squad. No one would even miss them.

His supreme court picks were terrible, so I am surprised that you would even mention them.

The jury is still out on his Attny Gen pick. I am not very impressed so far, but if she does her job with Hillary, an obvious felon, then I will concede a decent choice.

Guest 03-03-2016 11:40 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1193677)
I still think Kasich/Rubio would trounce the Dems in Nov. Trump could be ambassador to Mexico. Cruz could be ambassador to Cuba or Canada, his choice. I'd appoint Sanders ambassador to North Korea, except that he'd probably like it there

I really love your Kasich/Rubio ticket. I have mentioned it before. So, great minds think alike.

Trump being ambassador to Mexico, would put him to far away from the US/Mexican border that he loves so much. Like in the movie Blazing Saddles, we could put a toll booth on the border, and Trump could check to make sure the Mexicans coming in have the proper paperwork, and the correct change for the toll booth. He could be our border version of a Wal-Mart greeter. Happy face, and all!

Canadians are well mannered people. They couldn't wait to get of Cruz, and they would never take him back. I guess they could tie him to a goalpost, and let the pucks fly.

Hillary could be appointed Ambassador to Libya. She could be assigned to the old Benghazi Ambassador's grounds. Given the numbers of Benghazi hearings there have been, that has to be the final conclusion for the Trey Gowdy hearings. The criminal returned to the seen of the crime.

Guest 03-03-2016 12:19 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1193726)
I really love your Kasich/Rubio ticket. I have mentioned it before. So, great minds think alike.

Trump being ambassador to Mexico, would put him to far away from the US/Mexican border that he loves so much. Like in the movie Blazing Saddles, we could put a toll booth on the border, and Trump could check to make sure the Mexicans coming in have the proper paperwork, and the correct change for the toll booth. He could be our border version of a Wal-Mart greeter. Happy face, and all!

Canadians are well mannered people. They couldn't wait to get of Cruz, and they would never take him back. I guess they could tie him to a goalpost, and let the pucks fly.

Hillary could be appointed Ambassador to Libya. She could be assigned to the old Benghazi Ambassador's grounds. Given the numbers of Benghazi hearings there have been, that has to be the final conclusion for the Trey Gowdy hearings. The criminal returned to the seen of the crime.

Too late to think of Kasich and Rubio. Besides, Kasich is a RINO.

Guest 03-03-2016 01:10 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1193685)
Osama bin Laden killed by U.S. forces - May 02, 2011 - HISTORY.com

And the Affordable Care Act. It does have problems still but can be fixed.

His Supreme Court choices.

His last Attorney General pick. The first was pretty bad in just picking a pit bull.

Joe Biden was also a bad pick IMHO. The man is a Cheshire cat as Clint Eastwood pointed out but a very able politician but not much else. He certainly did not get away from DC politics as usual by that VP pick.

Bin Laden was killed by SEAL TEAM 6, operating under standing orders from President Bush------STRIKE ONE

The ACA may be the single worst piece of legislation ever conceived and passed into law. It is nothing but the largest tax increase ever and the biggest Fed power grab ever-----STRIKE TWO

Kagan and Sotomayor are nothing but left wing idealogues and shills for Obama's failed policies----STRIKE THREE---YOU'RE OUT

Guest 03-03-2016 01:12 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1193740)
Too late to think of Kasich and Rubio. Besides, Kasich is a RINO.

Yes, but better a RINO than leftist Hilary or socialist Bernie

Guest 03-03-2016 02:11 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1193772)
Yes, but better a RINO than leftist Hilary or socialist Bernie

Yes, but why does it have to be either? Rubio, if he could ever get the nomination, could choose Haley, or Romney or anyone else that would also be a decent choice.

Guest 03-03-2016 02:26 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1193700)
Bin Laden was an old useless retiree, not even in the game anymore. Clinton could have had him taken out and would not give the green light for the sniper to take him out.

Obamacare is useless and too expensive. It is Anti-American and the ones that passed it ought to be put in front of a firing squad. No one would even miss them.

His supreme court picks were terrible, so I am surprised that you would even mention them.

The jury is still out on his Attny Gen pick. I am not very impressed so far, but if she does her job with Hillary, an obvious felon, then I will concede a decent choice.

You are coming at things from the Republican perspective; I am a Democrat.

And no one has still shown that Secretary Clinton has done anything criminal. Like all politicians and most lawyers I have encountered she does omit stuff and put her spin on other stuff.

Guest 03-03-2016 02:30 PM

It is all about the Trump.
 
Mitt Romney was dead on though with his assessment of Donald J. Trump. He is a Democrat in the mode of Franklin Delano Roosevelt (huge government) and not a limited government, checks-and-balances, respect for big business and the military Republican. It is all about the Trump!!

Guest 03-03-2016 03:29 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1193798)
You are coming at things from the Republican perspective; I am a Democrat.

And no one has still shown that Secretary Clinton has done anything criminal. Like all politicians and most lawyers I have encountered she does omit stuff and put her spin on other stuff.

She has implicated herself. Having classified on a personal computer is a felony. Having an uncleared technician work on her computer that contains classified information is a felony. Destroying classified information improperly is a criminal violation. Moving TS material from a secure location is a felony. She has broken so many laws that I am surprised she is even allowed to speak in public. I know what she did, because I worked for the State Dept and I know the laws and the briefings that EVERYONE gets in the Dept when before they are allowed access to classified information. And I know that form that she had to sign to get access to that material. If you go on the Internet, you can see redacted copies of email that came from her server. They were classified. They failed to redact the codes that were on those emails, which also indicate the source of the information, which is classified.

Knowing what I know, if I was on the jury at her trial, I could go to sleep and still find her guilty. If she is not found guilty of any felonies, then we do not have a justice system and I will never take anything the gov says seriously again. I see no way that she could possibly get off, other than someone pardoning her, and I am sure that Obama will once she is indicted. She threaten to take him down with her if she was indicted.

And you cannot blame the Republicans for this. This is being investigated by the supposedly non-partisan FBI.

Guest 03-03-2016 03:37 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1193823)
She has implicated herself. Having classified on a personal computer is a felony. Having an uncleared technician work on her computer that contains classified information is a felony. Destroying classified information improperly is a criminal violation. Moving TS material from a secure location is a felony. She has broken so many laws that I am surprised she is even allowed to speak in public. I know what she did, because I worked for the State Dept and I know the laws and the briefings that EVERYONE gets in the Dept when before they are allowed access to classified information. And I know that form that she had to sign to get access to that material. If you go on the Internet, you can see redacted copies of email that came from her server. They were classified. They failed to redact the codes that were on those emails, which also indicate the source of the information, which is classified.

Knowing what I know, if I was on the jury at her trial, I could go to sleep and still find her guilty. If she is not found guilty of any felonies, then we do not have a justice system and I will never take anything the gov says seriously again. I see no way that she could possibly get off, other than someone pardoning her, and I am sure that Obama will once she is indicted. She threaten to take him down with her if she was indicted.

And you cannot blame the Republicans for this. This is being investigated by the supposedly non-partisan FBI.

:BigApplause::BigApplause:

Guest 03-03-2016 03:54 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1193770)
Bin Laden was killed by SEAL TEAM 6, operating under standing orders from President Bush------STRIKE ONE

The ACA may be the single worst piece of legislation ever conceived and passed into law. It is nothing but the largest tax increase ever and the biggest Fed power grab ever-----STRIKE TWO

Kagan and Sotomayor are nothing but left wing idealogues and shills for Obama's failed policies----STRIKE THREE---YOU'RE OUT

Usually the pitcher doesn't call his own balls and strikes. When they do, they probably have never thrown a ball in their entire life. Funny how that works.

President Obama didn't have to order the seal team in. Well, that is news. 'This Is 50-50': Behind Obama's Decision to Kill Bin Laden - The Atlantic Ball one.

ACA is the worse piece of legislation ever conceived. I am pretty sure that over 12 million people that now have health insurance, children covered until age 26, and people with preexisting conditions would disagree with you. How about the outstanding legislation given to "W" to invade Iraq? My guess is that is nowhere on your list. Ball two.

What would you call Scalia, and Thomas probably two open minded justices that would never vote based upon their political beliefs. Hit by a pitch, take your base.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.