:agree:

[Martin Luther King, Jr.] once said, “The Negro cannot win as long as he is willing to sacrifice the lives of his children for comfort and safety.” How can the “Dream” survive if we murder the children? Every aborted baby is like a slave in the womb of his or her mother. The mother decides his or her fate

98% of abortions are due to convenience

0.3% of abortions are due to rape/incest

1.7% of abortions are due to health of mother or baby

Birth control by abortion seems to be very convenient. So, 98% of those babies were murdered because females have the right to murder due to convenience. And PP is funded by the taxpayer, which means we are complicit in murder. Gov sponsored murder of the innocent.

Working "slave" in your MLK post is well done, isn't it?

Now, again, if we could only get the attention of the supporters and the radicals who insist on making the issue about the 2% above.

As has been said in many previous posts.....the issue is about the 98% getting abortions for convenienc or using it for birth control or rejecting a sex they did not want.....this is the market that PP works....for profit....for butchering live fetus for parts AND SELLING......throwing the rest of the unwanted once living fetus in the garbage.

All the whille waving the rape and incest flag and making that what PP is all about.

It is a federally funded slaughter house of born and unborn children.

WAKE up and address the facts and the issue. We don't need to be constantly reminded about the 2%. YOU need to be constantly reminded about the immoral and troubelsome 98%.

:thumbup:

Not my words. I believe this was a quote from King's niece and posted on a Congressional Record.

The posts are about taking life, or don't you feel sending people to their death by making up wmd stories is essential?

The truth is that the abortion issue will never be settled on this forum nor will anyone change their view based on this forum.

Abortions ARE legal in the USA and will stay legal.

It is not a deciding factor for voters. Many more important issues than abortion are at stake.

You know that King never said what you have put in quotes. The meme comes from his anti-choice niece who herself had more than one abortion, utilized her right to choice when it was needed by her. The actual quote comes from a MLK speech in 1958, a full 15 years before Roe v Wade.
He was speaking about the Negro passively accepting segregation and injustice. The correct words he spoke

https://www.deltacollege.edu/emp/pwa...Oppression.pdf

"Acquiescence is interpreted as proof of the Negro's inferiority. The Negro cannot win the respect of the white people of the South or the peoples of the world if he is willing to sell the future of his children for his personal and immediate comfort and safety"

Totally different meaning. He was speaking to encourage blacks to leave their comfort zone and fight against racism and not doom the next generation to the same bigotry and brutality as his generation had endured. His niece twisted it and misquoted, but now you know the truth.

there is absolutely nothing very convenient about having an abortion. Yes most are not done because of rape or incest but none are done for convenience. Every one of those woman would have preferred not to have gotten pregnant at that time with that fetus. There are studies looking at the reported factors in a woman choosing to terminate, and "very convenient" has never been one. There are myriad social, economic, and relationship issues. The rape and incest concern is only mentioned because almost every GOP candidate would go so far as to even prohibit those terminations. Several GOP controlled states have already passed anti-abortion laws which do not include an exception for rape nor incest. The mention of those two is to show how radical and out of touch the GOP legislators and executives have become as only the most right wing candidates can emerge from a primary fight. Support an exception for rape and incest and loose your primary. Even the "moderate" Rubio is against any termination for any reason.

Such a desperate attempt to justified baby murder. You can't even use the word "baby" in your pitiful attempt to justify it. You liberals use less than 1% of the cause as a basis to justify the totality of the demonic sacrifice. Be honest and call it what it truly is and you will have even less support than you did before. The only reason it is legal is because a court of a handful of idiots made it so. There would be no abortion if it was based on the majority. You know, the basis of "All the People" in our country? So, your pathetic argument is torn apart. Murder is the willful taking of another's life. Abortion is the taking of a baby's life, whether or not you attempt to call it a fetus or not. You can't admit to that because it would make you complicit in the moral crime.

You really are way out in LEFT field and high on a mixture of X-X-X- kool and soem of your meds.
As can be seen above the only conclusion to be reached from this post is BS prevails!

"The only reason it is legal is because a court of a handful of idiots made it so. There would be no abortion if it was based on the majority. You know, the basis of "All the People" in our country?"

Documentation on your majority claim, please.

Common sense and logic, backed by a knowledge of the American people. How many states allowed abortion before the supreme court allowed it?

Abortion was prohibited in 30 states and legal under certain circumstances (such as pregnancies resulting from rape or incest) in 20 states. The Supreme Court 1973 decision Roe v. Wade invalidated all of these laws, and set guidelines for the availability of abortion.

But, this is not JUST about abortion, even though the liberals insist on using it as a basis for breaking the law related to selling body parts. This is about illegal activity with the selling body parts for profit. It has to do with ONLY PP at this point. There are many other institutions, public and private and those that accept donations that also perform abortions. So, you liberals are not defending abortion. You are defending the abhorrent breaking of the law regarding selling body parts for profit. And it appears that this practice does not even bother you. As a matter of fact, you are so defensive that you bring up the abortion issue as your ONLY defense. Not a very strong argument. Even though any decent person does not agree with baby murder, we also recognize the legality of it, as opposed to selling the body parts.

So, in a nut shell, GET A LIFE.....versus taking a life.