Talk of The Villages Florida
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, Political talk (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/)
-   -   Benghazi Parents Sue Hillary (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/benghazi-parents-sue-hillary-204753/)

Guest 08-09-2016 09:23 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 1268964)
Intent is not required for some crimes, such as mishandling of classified information. And her ignorance of the law is pretty hard to convince, being she is a lawyer and being as she was instructed by the State Dept prior to her taking on the duties of SecState. And I am sure she was exposed to classified information as First lady and as senator. So, any excuse of ignorance is hard to prove. She was also told by the White House NOT to use her private server. She did so regardless and that shows the intent to violate. She also shows intent when she instructed her staff to remove classification markings and transmit them to her on the Internet, a felony. Any first year law student could convict her in court. She is protected right now. She won't see a court room until after the election.
Somebody that sounded like you told everyone intent won't matter with the FBI. How's that working out? niagara falls

Guest 08-09-2016 10:22 AM
:ohdear:Repubtards are scrapping the bottom of the barrel! Trump is in trouble and they are trying everything they can to make Clinton look bad! There have been (9) GOP led, onesided investigations done that proved no culpability on Clinton's part! So how much of the not responsible do these people not understand? Another Republican led witch hunt!!!:MOJE_whot:

Guest 08-09-2016 10:55 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 1269037)
There have been (9) GOP led, onesided investigations done that proved no culpability on Clinton's part!
that has nothing to do with a civil suit and what a jury decides.

Guest 08-09-2016 12:54 PM
The World Court in The Hague has tried GW Bush and Dick Cheney and found them both guilty of crimes against humanity in abstentia. If either sets foot in a country under the jurisdiction of the World Court, they will be imprisoned.

Guest 08-09-2016 01:01 PM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 1269085)
The World Court in The Hague has tried GW Bush and Dick Cheney and found them both guilty of crimes against humanity in abstentia. If either sets foot in a country under the jurisdiction of the World Court, they will be imprisoned.
Apparently they never heard about "intent", did they?

Guest 08-09-2016 01:04 PM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 1269085)
The World Court in The Hague has tried GW Bush and Dick Cheney and found them both guilty of crimes against humanity in abstentia. If either sets foot in a country under the jurisdiction of the World Court, they will be imprisoned.
WRONG!!!

You might want to read the last paragraph (Our ruling) of the link provided.

Are George W. Bush, Dick Cheney unable to visit Europe due to threat of arrest? | PolitiFact

Guest 08-09-2016 04:10 PM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 1269085)
The World Court in The Hague has tried GW Bush and Dick Cheney and found them both guilty of crimes against humanity in abstentia. If either sets foot in a country under the jurisdiction of the World Court, they will be imprisoned.
Your favorite source " Snopes " says not at all true .

So what do you have to say for yourself now ?

Guest 08-09-2016 04:12 PM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 1269176)
Your favorite source " Snopes " says not at all true .

So what do you have to say for yourself now ?
Obviously, you are one of the "useful idiots".

Guest 08-09-2016 04:16 PM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 1269180)
Obviously, you are one of the "useful idiots".
You get caught in a lie, and your response is to start the 'name calling'...typical liberal.

Guest 08-09-2016 04:54 PM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 1268964)
Intent is not required for some crimes, such as mishandling of classified information. And her ignorance of the law is pretty hard to convince, being she is a lawyer and being as she was instructed by the State Dept prior to her taking on the duties of SecState. And I am sure she was exposed to classified information as First lady and as senator. So, any excuse of ignorance is hard to prove. She was also told by the White House NOT to use her private server. She did so regardless and that shows the intent to violate. She also shows intent when she instructed her staff to remove classification markings and transmit them to her on the Internet, a felony. Any first year law student could convict her in court. She is protected right now. She won't see a court room until after the election.
You know nothing. There are RULES, break them and you're guilty. Whomever removed the classified markings is guilty. If she told someone else to remove the classification, she is guilty. ONLY the originator of the classified can remove the classification. She IS guilty. She IS being protected. We DO live in a corrupt banana republic.

Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 1269185)
You get caught in a lie, and your response is to start the 'name calling'...typical liberal.
It's what liberals do...tell you you're wrong than can't show why. "just because" is a favorite "reason".

Guest 08-09-2016 05:17 PM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 1269204)
You know nothing. There are RULES, break them and you're guilty. Whomever removed the classified markings is guilty. If she told someone else to remove the classification, she is guilty. ONLY the originator of the classified can remove the classification. She IS guilty. She IS being protected. We DO live in a corrupt banana republic.



It's what liberals do...tell you you're wrong than can't show why. "just because" is a favorite "reason".
"We DO live in a corrupt banana republic."

I suggest if you think that way then leave the country, I suggest you go to Somalia.

Guest 08-09-2016 06:24 PM
After all the name calling, at least we all agree Snopes is a reliable source of information. Thank goodness

Guest 08-09-2016 07:19 PM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 1269231)
After all the name calling, at least we all agree Snopes is a reliable source of information. Thank goodness

No we don`t agree with you at all .

I just found it amusing that the favorite source of the Left found this particular claim to be too outrageous for even them to try to
twist into a fact .

Guest 08-09-2016 08:23 PM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 1269251)
No we don`t agree with you at all .

I just found it amusing that the favorite source of the Left found this particular claim to be too outrageous for even them to try to
twist into a fact .
That's convenient when the site works in your favor. Some people on the left were were sucked into the rumors. They were wrong.

How about you and I work together and use Snopes to clear things up?

Do you have that confidence?

Guest 08-09-2016 09:01 PM
If you went back in back in time, theoretically, and my son was inserted into the Bengazi situation, I would want someone like Trump to be deciding whether or not help was to be sent immediately, because it would. Unfortunately we already know what Hillary would do.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:34 PM.
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.