Betting Odds - not polls

Betting Odds - not polls

Notices

» Site Navigation
Home Page The Villages Maps The Villages Activities The Villages Clubs The Villages Book Healthcare Rentals Real Estate Section Classified Section The Villages Directory Home Improvement Site Guidelines Advertising Info Register Now Video Tutorials Frequently Asked Questions
» Newsletter Signup
» Premium Tower
» Advertisements
» Trending News
» Tower Sponsors




















» Premium Sponsors
» Banner Sponsors
» Advertisements
 
 
Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 06-17-2016, 06:24 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
And what the is that supposed to prove?

In addition to making a wrong presumption that one does not.

Typical twist of another's viewpoint or post to make a point or further an agenda!!!
It means they don't understand how betting works. Explain it to them?

BTW just curse, TOTV will block it out for you. Either way it's not shocking now that we're all past 12.

  #12  
Old 06-17-2016, 06:26 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

#%& %&( @##

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920AZ using Tapatalk
Sponsored Links
  #13  
Old 06-18-2016, 04:29 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Absolutely true!

Polls are manipulated for whatever group does them. Betting odds are all about money. The politics have nothing to do with betting odds.
Politics has everything to do with it. They know the "race" is fixed.
  #14  
Old 06-18-2016, 07:07 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Election betting odds are now showing that Hillary Clinton has a 74.4 percent chance of being the next President.

Donald Trump is limping in at a 20 percent chance of being the next President.

The professional gamblers (yes, they do make a living doing this) are picking Hillary.

Not a partisan choosing here - just what the professional odds makers are saying.
I hope they are right. We need Hillary Clinton over the con man Donald Trump.
  #15  
Old 06-18-2016, 07:25 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
I hope they are right. We need Hillary Clinton over the con man Donald Trump.
What an idiotic joke. To suggest that anyone could compare to the Clinton con's is ludicrous. You are definitely not the brightest bulb on the Christmas tree. But, you are not alone. Not too many liberals are considered "bright." It is obvious that the liberal claim to higher education is a very expensive con/joke. Apparently, all liberals learn in college is how to get to the end as easy and effortlessly as possible. And that is how they take life, easy and no effort. Synonymous with what the average person would call "LAZY." Just more educated welfare cases, looking for a fast buck or freebie. And they finish college without learning anything but how to scam the system. College is so easy now, that my granddaughter that isn't even old enough to drive yet, is taking college courses and will have a two year degree by the time she graduates from high school. Not to disparage her, because she is a well motivated and smart young lady. But, college degrees can be obtained in a multitude of ways, including on-line, correspondence, part-time and night school. It's not even necessary to visit a college campus anymore. But, that is where you will find your empty headed liberal, on the college campus.
  #16  
Old 06-18-2016, 07:35 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
What an idiotic joke. To suggest that anyone could compare to the Clinton con's is ludicrous. You are definitely not the brightest bulb on the Christmas tree. But, you are not alone. Not too many liberals are considered "bright." It is obvious that the liberal claim to higher education is a very expensive con/joke. Apparently, all liberals learn in college is how to get to the end as easy and effortlessly as possible. And that is how they take life, easy and no effort. Synonymous with what the average person would call "LAZY." Just more educated welfare cases, looking for a fast buck or freebie. And they finish college without learning anything but how to scam the system. College is so easy now, that my granddaughter that isn't even old enough to drive yet, is taking college courses and will have a two year degree by the time she graduates from high school. Not to disparage her, because she is a well motivated and smart young lady. But, college degrees can be obtained in a multitude of ways, including on-line, correspondence, part-time and night school. It's not even necessary to visit a college campus anymore. But, that is where you will find your empty headed liberal, on the college campus.
Your grand daughter will do fine. She's smart and has ambition.

It's the other 100,000 going for 10,000 jobs who kicked back, partied, and got Cs who won't do well. They wasted their tuition. We'll probably end up paying for it too. We can't ALL be chiefs, and some have no business trying.
  #17  
Old 06-18-2016, 08:45 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Your grand daughter will do fine. She's smart and has ambition.

It's the other 100,000 going for 10,000 jobs who kicked back, partied, and got Cs who won't do well. They wasted their tuition. We'll probably end up paying for it too. We can't ALL be chiefs, and some have no business trying.
Obama raises his hand and shouts it worked for me.

And Clinton is right behind him saying me too.
  #18  
Old 06-18-2016, 09:57 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Obama raises his hand and shouts it worked for me.

And Clinton is right behind him saying me too.
I believe there is a difference between Affirmative Action and those that earned it/qualified for it. I don't put much stock in Obama's education when he doesn't even know the difference between a corpse and a corpsman. One being a dead body and the other trying to keep one from becoming a dead body. I don't put much value in his education if he doesnt' know how many states we have. And I certainly don't put much credibility in his being Commander-in-Chief if he doesn't know the difference between an assault weapon (full automatic capability) and a semi-automatic weapon.

On the other hand, Clinton does not even know her Constitution, let alone what constitutes a "weapon of war" as she calls it.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg hillaryconstitution.jpg (41.6 KB, 3 views)
  #19  
Old 06-18-2016, 12:37 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
I believe there is a difference between Affirmative Action and those that earned it/qualified for it. I don't put much stock in Obama's education when he doesn't even know the difference between a corpse and a corpsman. One being a dead body and the other trying to keep one from becoming a dead body. I don't put much value in his education if he doesnt' know how many states we have. And I certainly don't put much credibility in his being Commander-in-Chief if he doesn't know the difference between an assault weapon (full automatic capability) and a semi-automatic weapon.

On the other hand, Clinton does not even know her Constitution, let alone what constitutes a "weapon of war" as she calls it.
I wouldn't either if what you said were true.
  #20  
Old 06-18-2016, 05:35 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
I wouldn't either if what you said were true.
It's all on record. Google is your friend.
 

Tags
professional, polls, odds, betting

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:04 PM.