Posted by Guest (Post 459919)

KatzPajamas,
This is what I meant in my post about the media in Obamas pocket.

In this case it is the throngs of Obama worshippers come out of the woodwork to defend him and to name call and put down anybody that would attack their king.

"The King has has no clothes"

Posted by Guest (Post 459913)

What does that even mean?

Posted by Guest (Post 459919)

KatzPajamas,
This is what I meant in my post about the media in Obamas pocket.

In this case it is the throngs of Obama worshippers come out of the woodwork to defend him and to name call and put down anybody that would attack their king.

"The King has no clothes"

Posted by Guest (Post 459801)

Good Detective Work On Obama. Those of you that think the "birthers" are stupid and irrelevant, explain this one away.

1. Back in 1961 people of color were called 'Negroes.' So how can the Obama 'birth certificate' state he is 'African-American' when the term wasn't even used at that time?Where did the term African-American originate

2. The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama's birth as August 4, 1961. It also lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, right? At the time of Obama's birth, it also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama's father was born in "Kenya, EastAfrica ". This wouldn't seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama's birth, and 27 years after his father's birth. How could Obama's father have been born in a country that did not yet exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the " British East Africa Protectorate".https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya

3. On the birth certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is "Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital ". This cannot be, because the hospital(S) in question in 1961 were called "KauiKeolani Children's Hospital" and "Kapi'olani Maternity Home", respectively. The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978?

Resources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History...org/wiki/Kenya(from Wikipedia)

Why hasn't this been discussed in the major media?

"IN GOD WE TRUST"

Posted by Guest (Post 459959)

Katz, you have lost all - and I mean all - credibility on this forum with your ridiculous posting of Obama's birth certificate being false.

You should be ashamed of yourself for being gullible enough to believe any of the bunk that you posted.

No credibility whatsover!

Posted by Guest (Post 459846)

You diminish your ability to coherently argue against Obama's reelection by trying to convince people of this ridiculous "birther" nonsense. There are legitimate reasons to oppose his reelection and support opposition candidates, but this kind of silliness makes you look out of touch with reality and desperate. snopes.com: Barack Obama Birth Certificate

Posted by Guest (Post 459872)

I doubt that anything will ever be done about whatever the truth might be. I just thought that these points were very interesting!
I don't appreciate your personal unsolicited judgment of my grasp of reality. I guess I could say the same about alot of folks on this forum, but I am not that condescending and rude. Anyway, we are both fortunate to be living in a land that still sanctions our freedom to voice our opinions!

Posted by Guest (Post 459922)

Keep hanging your hat on the birther issue and you will assure a second term for Obama. I am not a committed Obama supporter, but I am a supporter of truth. The birther issue is a non-starter and a distraction, which makes it's proponents appear to be nitwits, and causes most people to react in the opposite way the birther proponents would hope.

Posted by Guest (Post 459926)

I don't know if you read my 1st post but I said I was NOT a birther.

So

What I said was it was not a good way to get him out of office, but then I guess that fact did not fit your put down.

I am not a nitwit and would not call you one. It is a shame that you have to go personal.

Posted by Guest (Post 459909)

Check with Donald Trump on that - he has all the answers. He sent his cracker-jack team of "special investigators" out to Hawaii last May and they supposedly collected all the facts. Although, I must admit, it is sort of strange that nobdy ever heard from those "special investigators".

Surely, you recall. It was on - or about - May 1. While Donny and his "investigators" were tracking down the birther issues - and all the cons were holding their collective breath in anticipation, The President was taking out the worlds number 1 terrorist.

Google it - maybe it'll shake your memory.

Posted by Guest (Post 459930)

I can't believe that anyone continues to waste their time discussing this.

But as long as there seems to be a "need" to continue to try to figure out some way to get rid of Obama instead of actually winning an election--something that is beginning to appear very unlikely--maybe we should discuss what might happen if he actually was removed from office for not satisfying the legal requirement for holding office. Vice President Biden would be elevated to POTUS. I suppose John Boehner would become Vice President.

Y'know that might not be too bad. Biden is probably more stable and experienced than any of the candidates beating one another up trying to get the GOP nomination to run against Obama in the fall. And if we got Boehner out of the leadership of the House, where he's done a simply awful job, that's not all bad either.