More like an "S" for socialist or "C" for commie. The only draft you endorse is one for someone else. Typical liberal that enjoys the fruits of other folks' labors.

Oh? Did Bush institute any EO's that countered congressional vote? Did Bush sign any EO's that the people didn't want? Did he sign any that the supreme court said were unlawful? Better do some research before running amok with your attacks, son. Of course, once pushed into a corner, you will weasel out of it by diverting again. Same as always......blame Bush or name call.

Oh, and by the way....I believe Obama has bombed twice as many countries as Bush, and that was my count as of 2014. So, go back to your basement and play your video games with the other kids, or get ready for school.

I'd say he better spend more time practicing his "would you like fries with that order?"

I'll put up my families military history against yours....

I'm for the draft so that all families share in the experience... I have 3 in the military now one with 5 tours in Iraq and the purple heart.

Your insults are wasted over here. :boom:

Your are deflecting not me... I only pointed out the exact number of EO's

:blahblahblah::blahblahblah:

Who gives a rat's behind?

How do these topics get so twisted around to something else.

Just for the record...

"But an analysis of the number of executive orders is incomplete. As John Hudak of the Brookings Institution pointed out, “not all executive orders are created equal. Some are quite forceful, making dramatic changes to policy. Others are more routine, housekeeping issues. To say that one president issued more executive orders than another, tells us little about the scope of those orders or the impact they have on policy.”

Measuring the Content, Not Just the Number, of Executive Orders and Proclamations | Mercatus

"President Obama has issued a form of executive action known as the presidential memorandum more often than any other president in history — using it to take unilateral action even as he has signed fewer executive orders.

When these two forms of directives are taken together, Obama is on track to take more high-level executive actions than any president since Harry Truman battled the "Do Nothing Congress" almost seven decades ago, according to a USA TODAY review of presidential documents.

Obama issues 'executive orders by another name'

and when the urinating contest of numbers subsides, what is important is the reality of today and the incompetence currently occupying the WH.

To afraid to compare?

Just throw the commie insult....

So small minded anything an inch left of you is Commie.

Spin Spin Spin are you dizzy yet????

I agree. It's about as ridiculous as the OP's statement about putting the current president in prison.

Dear Guest: I asked on post #19) what's the point of this thread.
What we have here is a real school yard brawl of my dad can beat up your dad

Personal Best Regards:

Yes, I noticed that you KNOW someone in the military. Convenient to KNOW someone in the military. Most liberals are more than willing to have someone else do the work. Someone else to pay the bills for you.

Yes, facts are a bit too much for you. You can't answer this one. It's way above your knowledge level and you are too lazy to check it out. You make false charges or use a simple (describes you well) general statements that mean nothing. Kind of like saying there were more blue skies during Obama than during Bush. Nothing but general statements that show how ignorant you are.