Dude was mentally ill. No one wanted to talk about it.

Seems addressing mental illness and the stigma surrounding it would be far more useful.

That's why we keep "kiddies" to a minimum in The Villages. How many shootings do you hear about here? Why? Because all the crazies that are against guns and then go out and shoot up the place are young liberals. Like this black/gay guy....a liberal.

Is it just coincidence that even the wackos go after the unarmed innocents?

Don't forget the "liberal" retired police captain who shot and killed a young man in a theater for tossing popcorn on him.

So, the person that killed the nine people in a South Carolina church was a young liberal. Could have fooled me.

Since Fox didn't pick up the lives that were saved as reported in the American Rifleman, Fox News must be part of the main stream liberal media. Again, could of fooled me.

Maybe just maybe, you should not try to pin all the sins of the world on people that do not walk lock step with your views. By all means stay in character. I don't think you know any other way to act.

When your messiah in the White House and wacko Clinton can shut up after these incidents about guns being the culprit for anything wrong maybe I'll not have to point out that there are millions of guns in America and I have yet to learn of a criminal gun that went out and killed someone. I was also pointing out that it's interesting that the majority of wacko's that go on a shooting spree are generally from the left. Maybe because the left is generally morally and ethically challenged? Without faith they have nothing to live for? Without faith, they may not have a conscience? Just an observation.

Did he go out with the intention of killing people?

Did you have a point? "..SC church,.. Fox news.. and walk lock step?" A coherent thought would be useful in a conversation.

Did you have a point? "..SC church,.. Fox news.. and walk lock step?" A coherent thought would be useful in a conversation.

That's right. A coherent thought would be useful. So, try to make one. Take a look at post 42. His point is that all mass murders are young liberals.

Second point was in response to another post in this thread. It was asked how times did Fox News report people lives were saved a person that helped an unarmed person? The liberal press would never report this type of incident. He referred to America Rifleman reports not Fox News. Deductive reasoning, the conclusion would be Fox News is part of the liberal press, because neither treat people that saving another person life is news worthy.

Is your memory that bad, that you can't remember any post here , but the one before yours? That is so sad, that I feel sorry for you.

It sounds as though you are either approving of the retired police captain's killing the man who tossed popcorn on him or defending hus actions. Which is it and why?

If I were the poster and I am not, I would say neither. You have wrongly restated the post to reflect how you view or want the results. Providing a choice of two, neither of which addresses the posts objective.

I will allow there are differing aspects from different folks.

Then there are those who by design ignore the original intent and try to re-state the issue to focus in another direction entirely. (I am not saying that was what was done.)

I do not conclude approval or defending from the post in question.

The question was about intention......nothing more.

It really gets old when posters make these kind of questions with ONLY two answers when they KNOW they are just trying to set you up. Are people actually this shallow ?

Sounds like the President speaking...it is his habit to do that also (either this plan or war).

More rambling. But, you did get you intended attention. Now, do you have a point, or what? You have my permission to disagree with me, but please don't bore me to death with your liberal diversions from reality. :icon_bored:

My intention was for me to get your head out of your ass, but I failed. It is to imbedded in the Republican insistence that they are not responsible for anything. Any statement they made is well thought out like only young liberals commit mass murders. Anybody with a brain could see that.

Diversions from reality! Mr. Happy Face, Mr. Boring, Mr. Laugh at Anything, Mr. Clap Hands, you win the prize for the person most likely to contribute nothing to any thread. Keep it up. It suits you well. By the way, you don't bother me in the slightest. So, keep firing your worthless cheap shots, you might actually hit something some day, but I doubt it.

Let me respond to my own post. More rambling. I just took the words right out of your mouth. Now, go scratch your head, and come up with another cheap shot.

'He' is a she. Staunch supporter of the Second Amendment.

Have you ever been diagnosed with anger issues? Believe it or not, the thread was a statement regarding the shooting and the accusation of persons being "racists." You do seem to exaggerate a bit regarding my "insistence" that Republicans are not responsible for anything. On the other hand, if the Dems want to take credit for all their failed but partisan passed bills in the last two terms, they do set themselves up for that kind of rhetoric. I am so relieved that I don't bother you in the slightest. I would be very concerned if I thought that I had upset you......not really. 8^)

Did the NRA send a free membership to the families of the slain reporter and the camera man?

Maybe they would also include a copy of the second amendment suitable for framing.

Here is a question for you: Did you send them a sympathy card?

As a matter of fact, yes. Sent it c/o the television station in Roanoke.

You?

No. But then I'm not the one whining about the NRA.

Sounds like a lot of nyah nyah nyah nya type regurgitation.

:confused:

I think the story has unraveled as far as it is going to unravel.

Does the OP still think that Flanagan has "won" any sympathy from the press?

Personally, I don't think so. Anything I missed that suggests he did "win" something?

Glad that he shot himself so there won't be a waste of time and money for a trial that he would be sentenced to the mental hospital.

Dear Guest: You respond to my comments in post #6 with the above-stated comments(#7). However you never address the authenticity of my comments.

Is it not true that this guy shot these people because he believed his treatment and firing from this TV station was because he was black and gay?

Is it not true that :Black Lives Matter" movement ignores all other lives as being inconsequential including those of unborn? And ironically most of the unborn being aborted are black.

Is it not true that the 7 video produced clearly show that Planned Parenthood is cutting up the unborn for profit?

Is it not true that the progressive media will ignore or discredit these events as being politically motivated by conservatives?

Is it not true that progressives honestly believe that the 2nd Amendment ought to be repealed?

Is it not true that millions upon millions of Americans own guns and are responsible citizens?

Is it not true that the criminal element comes by their firearms illegally?

Is it not true that if this murder could not get a gun he would have found another instrument of death to carry out his vendetta?

Is it not true that the real issue here is a deep in-study into why our mental health system is failing?

Is it not true that these shootings while sensational blind this country to the fact that millions of people are not being served properly by state/federal governments, psychiatrists, etc ?

It it not true that social progressives create more harm with their policies and the present health care system laws are one example?

Personal Best Regards:

That's about as valid as asking if the brand of getaway car dealership sent a free Triple A membership to the families. Maybe we should also blame Jack Daniels for the next DWI that occurs.

A simple answer to a simple person - NO.

A good example where see something say something did not apply becuase nobody wanted to hurt any feelings or rile the race police.

How about now?After one reviews his background how can anybody make this a case for gun violence.
He was cruising in the race bait lane for a long time. He was menatlly and racially disturbed.
Nobody reported anything....until NOW!

As long as the left knows they can take advantage of race hate to enforce the black vote, we will continue to see racial tension increase. They can't stand leaders such as Dr.Carson, West and others that call for peace and understanding. It is the liberal left that urges and agitates the race hate, and the liberal media that broadcasts it.

Ever wonder how the left has the audacity to preach anti-war and peace, and then turn around and march on wall street, violent protests every time a black thug gets his due from the police in self defense, and violent protests (black lives matter) when politicians are giving speeches, etc.

And before the liberal troll retorts with the tired old "hate" accusation, let me set him straight. It ain't hate, even though that is your one badly abused and misused term, it's disgust and disapproval. Especially for those that don't deserve empathy, such as criminals and thugs.