I'm having trouble following your logic. Your response to my admonishment of people who are being sucked into the liberal media's baseless crucifying of Mr. Cain without any real proof, was to admonish me for my previous comments quoting Ms. Coulter, who you imply you don't find a serious source.

NOW, you say that although you find truth in her columns, you don't like her tone. So, how is that anything like the media destruction of Mr. Cain without real evidence of any truth to what these women say?

I think you're a bit confused. At least, I am.

:ohdear: You know better than that.

The fact that he quit was an admission of guilt. You can't blame the victims when there were too many to count. Herman knew there was lots more coming out.

The "god-forsaken liberal democrat media" that you mention has a lot more republicans on than Fox has democrats. Google Fox Viewers Misinformed to see the results of a study that says Fox viewers are not very bright (to put it kindly).

Political campaigns are run on money and support and these were waning. The campaign was in trouble even before these spurious allegations.

The rest of your comments are too ridiculous to address.

Yeah, right!! This survey is as idiotic as any I've ever seen, and I fail to see what it has to do with this thread. The liberal's mind is very convoluted if this forum is any evidence.

Herman Cain's implosion was a case of he said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said.

Not quite true. There were only 2 women who say anything. Another was given permission to say and didn't, so she is to be ignored on the face of it.

The other two women have backgrounds of other baseless charges and gold digging, and no evidence. No text's, no phone messages, no semen stained dress, no state troopers bringing her to his room; nothing.

You only believe it because of who he is, or was. A threat to "the one".

Right out of the right-wing playbook richie, I would expect more from you. Blame the alleged victims and then make the media the strawman, then you can explain away any transgression. According to many the source of many of the allegations against cain was that infamous liberal media mogul, rick perry. Shameful behavior from a mostly thoughtful contributor to this forum.

The thing that is apparent to some of us is that cain was NO threat to Obama, so good riddance.

I guess it all depends on who you listen to on Fox. I think your "not very bright" comment shows little class. Nowhere in any of the articles that I read did they say that.
They said misinformed.
I did google what you said and most if not all where "pile on" left wing sites that were all too happy to get a study like this but wait......

Not so black and white as you would like to believe.

Anyone who watches fox news, to the exclusion of any other news outlets has to be misinformed. fox news is pretty much a propoganda organization for the right wing and therefore the information, and especially the opinions presented as fact, are slanted and therefore tainted. Some of the shows can offer a perspective that is valuable if one also consumes other points of view as well, but the far right has convinced their minions that anything other than the right wing viewpoint is the liberal media attempting to promote their socialist agenda. While the networks and cnn may occaisionally slant to the left, for the most part they are made up of journalists who try to get the story and let the chips fall where they may. msnbc is similarly tainted to the left wing perspective.

OK, I can accept that to a certain degree but you said "not very bright" and that in itself was misinformation and not helpful to any discussion.
It was added to incite and to dig at people you don't agree with.
I watch Fox and other news networks like CNN and sometimes MSNBC plus local major networks and I don't consider myself "not very bright"
Just because someone watches Fox does not make them dumb!

I just reread my post and I don't find, nor have I ever stated, "not very bright" to refer to anyone watching these shows. I agree that just because someone watches fox does not make them dumb.

OK maybe I am misreading your post but none of the articles stated "not very bright".
I was reading your post as you interpreting what the articles meant was not very bright.
If that is not what you meant then I apologize for inferring that.