![]() |
Quote:
USA = falling and degenerating....top of the list. |
Quote:
We need to stop all this "slavery guilt" crap and proclaim: You don't work in the garden, you don't eat. EVERYONE who wants to eat WILL do something. And believe me, you're going to want a job after see what we're going to have you doing. The city is going to SPARKLE! "When is lunch?" When your toothbrush is worn to the handle. We're going to hell. We're literally turning 3rd world. More than half the new school children are "dark". We're no longer the majority. Can you speak spanish or jive? Better learn. Why are we letting this happen? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Even in backward communities like Farmersburg, Iowa or Wormville, Mississippi, the people have more intellectual sense than that. Ignore the jackass and he will morph to another persona. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
What part wasn't true? Quote:
Why should someone who refuses to work, eat? Why should some people be allowed to live off of another's labor? Why should we be forced to work for others? The country ISN'T going down hill? Isn't going down in world rankings? There aren't more minority children than white children entering public school? This won't effect the entire country and our way of life? WHAT part isn't true? Why is it racist to speak the truth? There's only a right to "free speech" if it agrees with you. Agrees with your ideology. Isn't hurtful. Doesn't blame anyone. |
Quote:
"The aphorism is found in the Second Epistle of Paul the Apostle (with Silvanus and Timothy) to the Thessalonians, in which Paul writes: εἴ τις οὐ θέλει ἐργάζεσθαι μηδὲ ἐσθιέτω that is, If anyone is not willing to work, let him not eat" Of course, then you have the socialist view: "Leon Trotsky wrote that: "The old principle: who does not work shall not eat, has been replaced with a new one: who does not obey shall not eat." (this is probably more on the level of Bernie Sanders view too) |
I watched the interview and no where did Koch say he would vote for Hillary. He was saying that he was disappointed in today's candidates and the whole campaign, period. When he was asked if he would support Hillary, he said she would have to change a whole lot before he could think of supporting her. Hillary is the one that said she didn't want his support when someone mentioned the interview. He never offered it. Man, was this taken out of context and perverted.
|
Quote:
Radical progressive do not believe in our three Articles of Freedom because they have been replaced by socialist doctrine Radical progressives have been very active in re-writing American history to their liking Radical progressives have radical Hollywood people to carry their message across every movie theater, television set and live theater in this nation Personal Best Regards: |
Quote:
Personal Best Regards: |
Koch said:
"We would have to believe her actions would be quite different than her rhetoric. Let me put it that way," he said on ABC's "This Week" Sunday. This means she would need to change her position to get their support. "But on some of the Republican candidates we would -- before we could support them, we'd have to believe their actions will be quite different than the rhetoric we've heard so far." This means they would need to change their position to get their support. The very rich will make the policy and if you want their money you will go along with it. Koch's financially support congress. You get more for your money that way. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:33 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.