Wow..you have to get out more.

First of all, NO "cons" have "admitted" anything. A number of opinions were given, construed by the media as an opinion not shared by the committee on Benghazi.

It was the committee on Benghazi that had the comments, and NOT the FBI investigation. You have your spin all mixed up and confused.

FBI is not controlled by any party, that I know of.

Lastly, please explain WHY anyone would ever in a million years have a conspiracy of ANY KIND to affect POLLS.

POLLS ? A group of about 1000 people are asked questions.

Please get up to speed and know what you are speaking of before you post.

:clap2:....:thumbup:

This thread is like listening to 50 different people telling the same joke they all heard last night!!
:1rotfl:
:clap2:

Perhaps a history lesson is in order at this point....

How many US Presidents have been impeached?

Answer: None The House voted impeachment for Andrew Jackson and Bill Clinton but the Senate acquitted them.

Why wasn't Nixon impeached for Watergate? The Democrats could have done that but allowed the Republican's to go to Nixon and talk him into leaving...for the good of the country.

Bill Clinton and Hillary were the subjects of a long investigation which cost mllions of dollars only to find out what the American public already knew...Bill Clinton couldn't keep it, like most men, in his pants.

The Democrats could and really thought about bring articles of impeachment against Bush for war crimes and lying in the run up to the war but they had learned a lesson during the Clinton impeachment. Clinton got more popular, with the public, after his impeachment and won re-election.

For a number of years we have been hearing about impeaching Obama and now there are calls to impeach Hillary on the first day she take office.

Oh please keep it up... You all boosted her up in the polls when a bunch of mostly white guys hammered on her for 11 hours.

Keep of the impeachment talk she will win.

That is the main difference between Democrat's and Republican's we learn our lessons and you are just out to get anyone who disagrees with you. Point in fact when have to ever seen or heard a protestor dragged out of a Democratic prep rally? The only thing close to that in the past was GW Bush's campaign who would have protestors arrested.

Release the hounds!!!!

Did those past presidents jeopardize national security by mishandling classified material? It's quite obvious that Hillary is guilty of blatantly mishandling high level classified information. I have the statutes she violated if you need them.

Did Bush torture?

Revisionist history, once again sans any facts

1. The impeachment proceedings against Clinton were based on perjury and bstruction of Justice, not his "cigaring" in the Oval Office.

Also to remind you, he and Hillary also lied to the entire nation right before his first election. He and Hillary both looked into those 60 Minute cameras and denied the entire Genifer Flowers item.

Good thing about his impeachment proceedings he finally admitted under oath that he lied, but that lie on 60 minutes is what got him elected.

If you think the Clintons first run at lying was in Washinton, you are very naive. Volumes on the Arkansas time, all proven and not denied.

They are accomplished liars.

2. You make the Democrats out like nice guys with Nixon and have no idea where you came up with that fantasy. Nixon, cheat and stupid bum he was, would have stayed as long as possible. He resigned because one single tape, a smoking gun, lost all his Republican support and he knew it was over.

3. The Bush talk is like the Obama talk and the new Clinton talk. Political rhetoric and that's it.

While you assessment of Democrats and Republicans is also an exercise in fantasy, it exposes nativity.

To answer your question about protestors, I refer you to the 1968 RIOTS IN THE STREETS of Chicago during the Democratic convention.

I would hope that some posters stop revising history to fit their narrative. There are enough real things to discuss without making things up or leaving things out.
.

Clinton Impeachment
 

You poor thing....go lay down.It's time for your nap.When you wake up
we will find your coloring book.

I'm sure you are MORE (or less) knowledgeable than the committee that hammered Hilary for 11 hours to NO avail!....Give it up.. and get ready for the First Female President:BigApplause:

Just a reminder, if I may.

NOBODY knew about the Clinton and her, at that time, hidden emails and hidden servers. They were hidden until the committee found out.

While she might win, I cannot believe the mileage that she and her minnions like you are getting out of this. A victory lap because she did not blow her top. A few more inconsistencies came out and much more to come.

But, you have your parties, enjoy yourself. She testified without losing her temper. Practice makes perfect and she surely has had a ton of that practice.

He lied about sex...pure and simple. And yes the Democratic National convention did see rioting in the streets. What happened yesterday at a Trump rally is completely different.

Not sure what you are speaking of ? I know about the disruption but was responding to a post on impeachment !!

Did I miss something ?

Listen, the groups are out there and will interrupt. It is not reserved for Trump at all.

Again will just keep quiet because I have NO earthly idea why your brought that up. It happened and there will be more. Black Lives Matter has said so and been encouraged, not to interrupt, but to continue on their way by the President. It will happen to both parties and all candidates.

BOTH parties have histories and if someone feels it is worthwhile to bring those histories up, so be it.....I don't see the point at all.

AND by the way.......

I would not have posted except the poster who wrote about impeachment was so wrong and so far off base, it needed to be corrected.

Here is the link....

Video Shows Immigration Protester Dragged Across The Ground And Kicked At Trump Rally | ThinkProgress

This student was kicked by attendees while the crowd chanted USA USA USA

Well, I am sure not going to vote for those guys !!!!

Thanks for the link, but I try and avoid THINK PROGRESS at all costs. I try and avoid any website sponsored and run by any political party that is not a news site like this one.

But, still thanks for the concern and effort.

Please explain your point. Does it not reflect poorly on those who insist on being rude. We have rights to protest, but whether it be Republican or Democrat, rude behavior like this is just plain stupid.

We are still a country of laws.

Note in the article by an arm of the Democratic party...

" At one point, he appeared to endorse the use of violent tactics against these protesters."


I am nowhere near a Trump supporter, but do support good behavior and law.