| Guest |
10-23-2015 05:50 PM |
[QUOTE=Guest;1134085]Every cable sent to the State Dept is addressed to SecState and someone close to her had better be reading them and briefing her on the contents. She has NO/NO excuse for not knowing what is going on.
Every Ambassador is in contact with the SecState. Every embassy I have worked at, required special cables sent directly to the Secstate on a periodic basis, giving a situation report. She has NO/NO excuse, but she sure seems to be able to get over on these yokels that know nothing about how embassies are run.
Hilary Clinton had classified information on an unclassified computer system. I've seen the redacted emails and could still tell by the coding that they were highly classified. She is violation of Federal Law and should be prosecuted. Hopefully we have an FBI that is not as corrupt as our politicians in congress and in the White House.[/QUOTE
I don't question what you are saying. However, the former ambassador to Russia contradicts what you are saying. Ambassador Pickering was also in that MSNBC interview, and he never corrected the former Russian ambassador. If what you are saying is right, the yokels that don't know how their embassies works includes the ambassadors.
The FBI is going to have to determine when the classified tag was put on the emails. Since common sense isn't something that is in great supply in Washington, that may be hard to do. She is going to float on the charges, and the FBI are going to be tagged with in the pocket of Obama, and Clinton. A blind man can see this coming.
The IRS just gave their higher ups a free pass on targeting of Tea Party chartable organizations, and they are being tagged with in the bag of Obama. If you lose an argument, just say the other party cheated. It seems to make the loser feel better about himself.
|
