Conflict of interest, big time!

» Site Navigation
Home Page The Villages Maps The Villages Activities The Villages Clubs The Villages Book Healthcare Rentals Real Estate Section Classified Section The Villages Directory Home Improvement Site Guidelines Advertising Info Register Now Video Tutorials Frequently Asked Questions
» Newsletter Signup
» Premium Tower
» Advertisements
» Trending News
» Tower Sponsors




















» Premium Sponsors
» Banner Sponsors
» Advertisements
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 01-09-2017, 01:43 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default Conflict of interest, big time!

1. TRUMP WILL MANAGE HIS COMPANIES FROM WHITE HOUSE
2. SON - IN-LAW WILL BE SENIOR ADVISOR TO TRUMP IN WHITE HOUSE
3. IVANKA WON'T BE MANAGING TRUMP COMPANIES.


I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm sorry as hell, I voted for Trump!
  #2  
Old 01-09-2017, 02:27 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jebartle View Post
1. TRUMP WILL MANAGE HIS COMPANIES FROM WHITE HOUSE
2. SON - IN-LAW WILL BE SENIOR ADVISOR TO TRUMP IN WHITE HOUSE
3. IVANKA WON'T BE MANAGING TRUMP COMPANIES.


I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm sorry as hell, I voted for Trump!
Jebartle - You have been anti Trump on here for some time, why didn't you just vote for Crooked Hillary?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk
  #3  
Old 01-09-2017, 02:29 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

PS: Do you have a source for that info, or did someone you know have a dog that had a litter of puppies and the cousin of the person that bought one of the puppies knew a guy who said it??

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk
  #4  
Old 01-09-2017, 03:14 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default Please don't lie to yourself

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
1. TRUMP WILL MANAGE HIS COMPANIES FROM WHITE HOUSE
2. SON - IN-LAW WILL BE SENIOR ADVISOR TO TRUMP IN WHITE HOUSE
3. IVANKA WON'T BE MANAGING TRUMP COMPANIES.


I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm sorry as hell, I voted for Trump!
Assuming that you did IN FACT vote for TRUMP-
I too voted for TRUMP-I HAVE NO REGRETS ABOUT IT.

Hillary and in fact the CLINTON MOB are involved in sooooooo many criminal and immoral acts that I simply could not put them back into the white house. Hell last time they were MY/OUR guest the stole furniture and were forced to bring it back.

You post that you are SHOCKED that PRESIDENT ELECT TRUMP did not remove himself from his business. HOW COULD YOU BE SHOCKED-HIS NAME IS ON IT. How could he CLAIM, how could you BELIEVE that his name on the TRUMP TOWER, THE TRUMP CASINO. THE TRUMP? GOLF COURSE, TRUMP HOTEL ETC ETC ETC he would not be aware that anything that effects those properties would effect him and his family.

If, PRESIDENT ELECT TRUMPS family was running the TRUMP EMPIRE you and other PHONEY HILLARY SUPPORTERS would constantly post that PRESIDENT ELECT TRUMP spoke to his daughter ower lunch and they were over heard to be talking about some TRUMP owned business.

GET YOURSELF A COLORING BOOK AND SOME PLAY DOUGH.
  #5  
Old 01-09-2017, 05:09 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
1. TRUMP WILL MANAGE HIS COMPANIES FROM WHITE HOUSE
2. SON - IN-LAW WILL BE SENIOR ADVISOR TO TRUMP IN WHITE HOUSE
3. IVANKA WON'T BE MANAGING TRUMP COMPANIES.


I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm sorry as hell, I voted for Trump!
Quite a conclusion reached before the man has even taken office.

Stop watching the national media and ignore the whinning and bitching and groaning of the losers
  #6  
Old 01-09-2017, 05:27 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
1. TRUMP WILL MANAGE HIS COMPANIES FROM WHITE HOUSE
2. SON - IN-LAW WILL BE SENIOR ADVISOR TO TRUMP IN WHITE HOUSE
3. IVANKA WON'T BE MANAGING TRUMP COMPANIES.


I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm sorry as hell, I voted for Trump!
Did you vote twice? Because you said you voted for Hillary on another post.
  #7  
Old 01-09-2017, 06:37 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
1. TRUMP WILL MANAGE HIS COMPANIES FROM WHITE HOUSE
2. SON - IN-LAW WILL BE SENIOR ADVISOR TO TRUMP IN WHITE HOUSE
3. IVANKA WON'T BE MANAGING TRUMP COMPANIES.


I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm sorry as hell, I voted for Trump!

Trump's kids clearly know that Donald has mental issues. That's why they are positioning themselves near the oval office. It's sort of like when granny is diagnosed with Alzheimer's and all the kids have to take turns sitting with her.

All of the above are violations of the constitution, except for Ivanka. We'll see how long it takes for the GOP leadership to march in lockstep to the White House to remove Trump from office. In the meantime, he will be spending all his time in court.
  #8  
Old 01-09-2017, 06:54 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Jan - You will comment on anything, true or not, as long as it is negative to Trump.
I doubt Trump waste any time in court prosecuting Crooked Hillary, he will let his US Attorney handle that...
  #9  
Old 01-10-2017, 05:32 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Trump's kids clearly know that Donald has mental issues. That's why they are positioning themselves near the oval office. It's sort of like when granny is diagnosed with Alzheimer's and all the kids have to take turns sitting with her.

All of the above are violations of the constitution, except for Ivanka. We'll see how long it takes for the GOP leadership to march in lockstep to the White House to remove Trump from office. In the meantime, he will be spending all his time in court.

Hey Janie, let us know when you see Trump in court. Do us all a favor and hold your breath waiting. I like dark blue.
  #10  
Old 01-10-2017, 06:21 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Quite a conclusion reached before the man has even taken office.

Stop watching the national media and ignore the whinning and bitching and groaning of the losers
Who should you watch?
  #11  
Old 01-10-2017, 06:47 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Wait a minute.....was Trump involved is some type of business?

What a shock that no one knew that before voting.

  #12  
Old 01-10-2017, 06:52 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default The Lingering Resentment Of Progressives

In my view two worthy goals are saving our souls and saving our civics. Apparently the true majority of Americans also subscribe to that creed. Additionally 80% of Americans want the US Constitution to remain in tact as it had been written by our founders.

So the choices available to voters were 1) a party that was carrying us away from our traditional/national values to a politically correct global no man's (la la) land where as the song relates "Anything Goes"

or 2) a party where nation and tradition are valued where individual freedom of speech, thought , religion etc has a place and where borders matter.

The candidates have been both defined by either side so let's not waste our time here.

Those who voted for Trump understood he is a businessman and like many dealing in the global market. No matter what he does given his product is mainly in his name points to the fact that someone is going to complain (more below).

Bear in mind that Trump is already quite wealthy. Also consider that most politicians seem to enter politics relatively poor but leave quite wealthy. given their salary expenses and perks it still does not explain there good fortunate. It leaves one to question how many and how often have these same politicians been faced with "conflicts of interest" ergo the allegations of the Clinton, wealth, Pelosi, etc.

No matter what Trump does this "appearance of a conflict of interest is going to rear its ugly head if for no other reason then the lingering resentment of progressives. This is especially true of the news media that hate this guy so badly that they have gone beyond the pale to attempt to damage him, his family and his Admin picks.

Personal Best Regards:
  #13  
Old 01-10-2017, 07:00 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
In my view two worthy goals are saving our souls and saving our civics. Apparently the true majority of Americans also subscribe to that creed. Additionally 80% of Americans want the US Constitution to remain in tact as it had been written by our founders.

So the choices available to voters were 1) a party that was carrying us away from our traditional/national values to a politically correct global no man's (la la) land where as the song relates "Anything Goes"

or 2) a party where nation and tradition are valued where individual freedom of speech, thought , religion etc has a place and where borders matter.

The candidates have been both defined by either side so let's not waste our time here.

Those who voted for Trump understood he is a businessman and like many dealing in the global market. No matter what he does given his product is mainly in his name points to the fact that someone is going to complain (more below).

Bear in mind that Trump is already quite wealthy. Also consider that most politicians seem to enter politics relatively poor but leave quite wealthy. given their salary expenses and perks it still does not explain there good fortunate. It leaves one to question how many and how often have these same politicians been faced with "conflicts of interest" ergo the allegations of the Clinton, wealth, Pelosi, etc.

No matter what Trump does this "appearance of a conflict of interest is going to rear its ugly head if for no other reason then the lingering resentment of progressives. This is especially true of the news media that hate this guy so badly that they have gone beyond the pale to attempt to damage him, his family and his Admin picks.

Personal Best Regards:
EVERY one of them. If they're a D or an R. Those two parties are absolutely corrupt.
  #14  
Old 01-10-2017, 10:49 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default Say Again?

There is so much complaining about nepotism over Trump asking his son-in-law to be an adviser. A position that requires no confirmation, by the way.

Those of you complaining:

Do you remember who President Kennedy's Attorney General was? Yep, it was his BROTHER, Robert. Robert Kennedy did have to be confirmed and was.

Who would be screaming if Chelsea's husband had been afforded the same position as Trump's? Certainly not these same people.

OK for one party and not the other?
  #15  
Old 01-10-2017, 11:02 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
There is so much complaining about nepotism over Trump asking his son-in-law to be an adviser. A position that requires no confirmation, by the way.

Those of you complaining:

Do you remember who President Kennedy's Attorney General was? Yep, it was his BROTHER, Robert. Robert Kennedy did have to be confirmed and was.

Who would be screaming if Chelsea's husband had been afforded the same position as Trump's? Certainly not these same people.

OK for one party and not the other?


The anti-nepotism law was passed in 1967, four years after JFK was assassinated, and was put in place mainly because of RFK's nomination as attorney general.
 

Tags
house, white, time, big, interest


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:27 PM.