Originally Posted by Guest

Why would anyone be shocked, shocked that Loretta Lynch supports the president's policies. He nominated her. Would he nominate someone who has opposite views?

NOT shocked at all.

Point is, she is not being opposed because of her skin color as the racist folks on the left keep attacking about.

You are correct, however the one thing is the President's illegal proclomation on immigration which has already been overturned on law....how can an attorney general support something that is not legal and be confirmed, even if she was purple ?

The subject matter was racism and posters are predictably all over the board with rants and raves but do not focus on whether it truly exists to the extent proclaimed by Holder Obama or Sharpton. I offered my views on post #28

Clinton created NAFTA, our good paying jobs were moved to other countries and our poverty increased. The poor increased and the government gave them just enough food and just enough housing. People who have children would like to buy their children nice shoes and other extras so they do something illegal to make extra money, so easy to go to the ghetto and find someone doing something illegal! Easy to write tickets and fill a quota there. Now they are dividing the country on race. It is not about race! People who have great jobs are not in the news. People just need good paying jobs!

High employment and high paying jobs = less dependence on government hand outs = inconsistent with Obama agenda for the government depedent masses.

Originally Posted by Guest

High employment and high paying jobs = less dependence on government hand outs = inconsistent with Obama agenda for the government depedent masses.

More and more large corporations, like Target, Wal-Mart etc., are taking it upon themselves to raise the minimum wage. Some like Cosco are paying $15 per hour. As the unemployment rate drops, this is the only way they can get and keep good employees.

Originally Posted by Guest

More and more large corporations, like Target, Wal-Mart etc., are taking it upon themselves to raise the minimum wage. Some like Cosco are paying $15 per hour. As the unemployment rate drops, this is the only way they can get and keep good employees.

The real unemployment rate is not dropping. Just google real unemplyment rate 2014 and get an education.

And where is it written that the $15 will get and retain "good" employees. Most that will get the raise in pay will still be the employed.

Some of us remember all the same descriptions of how much better everything will be when the minimum wage went to $3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Get ready to pay more for your bugers....where do you think the $5-$10 per hour raise is going to come from?

Secondly if there are only 100 en mployees earning $10 per hour that is $1000 per hour expense to the owner.
At $15 per hour to stay at $1000 per hour the owner will have to lay off....LAYOFF......33 PEOPLE.

Time to wake up to reality folks!!!!

Originally Posted by Guest

The real unemployment rate is not dropping. Just google real unemplyment rate 2014 and get an education.

And where is it written that the $15 will get and retain "good" employees. Most that will get the raise in pay will still be the employed.

Some of us remember all the same descriptions of how much better everything will be when the minimum wage went to $3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Get ready to pay more for your bugers....where do you think the $5-$10 per hour raise is going to come from?

Secondly if there are only 100 en mployees earning $10 per hour that is $1000 per hour expense to the owner.
At $15 per hour to stay at $1000 per hour the owner will have to lay off....LAYOFF......33 PEOPLE.

Time to wake up to reality folks!!!!

Hopefully Wal-Mart, Target, Cosco, etc. have accountants on staff who can help them with the costs/benefits problems explained above.