Take a look at the post that this was a response. Why didn't you object to that post? The person that is guilty of the original violation of the rules is never caught. But the person that retaliates is always caught. Sounds like that is not the sole inhabitant of the sporting world.

If true, this surely answers a ton of questions ....

"The Democratic National Committee is 'clearing a path' for Hillary Clinton to be its presidential nominee because its upper power echelons are populated with women, according to a female committee member who was in Las Vegas for Tuesday's primary debate.
Speaking on the condition that she isn't identified, she told Daily Mail Online that the party is in the tank for Clinton, and the women who run the organization decided it 'early on.'

The committeewoman is supporting one of Hillary's rivals for the Democratic nomination, and said she spoke freely because she believes the former Secretary of State is benefiting from unfair favoritism inside the party.


Democratic National Committeewoman says her party is 'clearing a path' for Hillary Clinton | Daily Mail Online

All this is is a rant with no detail to back it up. Provide the links from a creditable source to support your rant.

Once again, a lazy liberal requiring assistance.

...or a regurgitating Regressive.

Nope, he can't be a "regressive." He's not a socialist/liberal so the term regressive hardly fits. After all, socialism is the old, REGRESSIVE ideology. Nice try, but really you should contact your special needs center and get your money back for your failed education.

Dear Guest:

I totally agree with you and want to thank you for the link.

It is just a mystery to me why people can't see what is right in front of them. Why is it many people can't read in between the lines anymore? Why is it they believe a politician's promise without challenge?

I am a registered Republican but there is not one Republican politician's message that won't be challenged and dissected by me for its truthfulness and effect.

Too many voters don't pay attention to more detail. They don't understand or care about the effect such policies offered by candidates will have on them? Too many eligible voters are disconnected and pay attention more to celebrity nonsense than who will be their next president. These are dangerous people because they have the right to vote but lack the intelligence or fortitude to carry out their responsibilities.

This sort of person has reaped the benefits and safety while living in our democracy without any thought that the support they offer is to politicians that want to take away their freedoms. In other words ho can you support a socialist program that eventually will have the federal government controlling every aspect of your lives. Its happening now under the Obama administration.

One other point of interest that we learned during the Democratic debate the other night is that the two leading Democratic candidates HATE Republicans. Now there is a nice beginning for a president that wants to represent all of the people. with such an admission on television how can either declare they would be uniters?

The state of this nation is in very serious and dangerous territory and voters better take heed

Personal Best Regards:

When you ask a Republican candidate something controversial regarding differences in ideology, they might say something negative about a particular Democrat. When you ask a Democrat candidate something controversial in regards to ideology, they blame the whole Republican party and will even admit "hating" all Republicans. Spewing poison.
When Obama is interviewed, he slurs the Republicans constantly and blames Bush for anything that he can't cope with. When you interview Bush, you NEVER hear him say anything negative about Obama or the ultra liberals in congress.

The difference is Class, along with maturity.

The Democrat candidates are pushing hate, discontent, and inequality in everything. They are greedy and selfish, resentful of those that are better than them. Their idea of foreign policy is to become isolationists, ignore the rest of the world. Their answer for unemployment is more gov jobs, and higher benefits for the lazy. Their answer for income inequality is higher taxes for those providing jobs, such as the wealthy, Wall St, Oil, and break up the large banking institutions. Their answer to home sales, is to replicate what caused the last housing bubble, bad mortgage loans for those that can't afford a home. Their answer for high college tuition is to make college free, paid by raising taxes some more. Their answer for violence is to get rid of tools for self-defense, instead of working on mental illness, the cause of violence. The answer for minority crime, is to punish the COPs. What kind of bizzoro world do these liberals/socialists live in?

This is a pretty doggone good assessment.

I, and others, have grown so weary of the "smear them ALL" attitude.

But we will continue to smear all them goldurn libruls as much as our little Tea Bag brains can allow.

WE are not the President of the United States !!!

WE are simple posters on TOTV.

If you cannot see the difference, not sense in explaining it.

It is noteable that you have excluded using "lyin libruls" from previous posts.

Yes, I do agree. YOU are quite simple!

It only takes a rather quick look through many of the posts on this forum to see who is "simple"and who is not. Those who are NOT simple post thoughtfully, with context, and often with links to support their post. Those who are simple or at least appear to be, post with short, sarcastic sentences with no substance, often not even related to the subject matter.

In perusing many of the posts on here, I often feel bad for those liberals (at least some that I know) that would not post such simple, antagonistic posts, but rather ones with more substance. I may not agree with their liberal stance but it's nice to converse once in awhile with those with opposing viewpoints, operative word being converse. I wonder if posters like many that we see on here scare away the less simple minded because they don't want to be lumped in with the group that is often reflected in this forum. If so, it's really too bad because by continuing the same back and forth that we often see on this forum, we all lose, as a people and as a country.

:agree: totally.