Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, Political talk (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/)
-   -   Debt reduction (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/debt-reduction-42727/)

Guest 09-21-2011 08:12 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 396973)
vg...too late you showed it all when on a previous post you used "muslims" in vain..Don't try to hide from it, my tea party friend...Bigotry is RAMPANT as is tacid approval by the party in general!

Ditto

Guest 09-21-2011 08:33 AM

A bigot is a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices, especially one exhibiting intolerance, and animosity toward those of differing beliefs.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bigotry

Who are the bigots on this forum? Certain posters continue to make blanket statements about certain groups with which I associate myself. When truth's are explained to them they exhibit an incredible amount of vehement and nasty intolerance and animosity. Sounds like bigotry to me...

Guest 09-21-2011 08:43 AM

Name calling is when there is no intelligent rebuttal. They know they are backing the losing horse and are desperate. Standing in the school yard yelling "bigot" and "racist" is actually a sad and pathetic reaction to the despair that they are failing to convince anybody that the democrats are going to turn this Great Depression around.
A solid vote for republican candidates in 2012 will restore this once great country and put people back to work and restore the pride that is sorely missing this last 3 years.

Guest 09-21-2011 08:45 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 396352)
Actually after over 2 1/2 years of Obama we are just now realizing how good Bush was. Don't you miss President Bush?

:pepper2:

Why is it President Bush and not George Walker Bush???????/

Guest 09-21-2011 09:10 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 397012)
Why is it President Bush and not George Walker Bush???????/

Take a ride to yesteryear of 2008 and you will find some unflattering names for President Bush. Bushy, Shrub, Herr Bush etc. Why is it the lefties can dish it out for 8 years but start whining after only a couple of years? :boxing2::ohdear:

Guest 09-21-2011 09:46 AM

Obamacorn
 
Acorn still receiving money form HUD. As we know Acorn was Obama's place of employment.

http://biggovernment.com/mvadum/2011...s/#more-335012

Guest 09-21-2011 09:58 AM

and I do so love when they re bashing a post or poster they do not agree with they continually use the phraseology such as "my white friend..." or my "tea party friend..." to be sure to get the talking point categorization goal(s) accomplished.

It is my favorite annoyance, among the many I have, and an annoyance to many participants that EVERYTHING/EVERYBODY has to be labeled...R or D or white or black or muslim or christian or what ever pigeon hole they are directed to work today, this week or month. How about just addressing the person, as you would in a public forum? Or the subject as one would in a public forum without all the partisan, race or religious qualifiers. It is just not the way most people communicate no matter the party, race or religion...they just don't.

And my general observation would be, it is either a partisan direction/objective or a lacking of depth of subject and or the language to be able to communicate adequately....my opinion. Why else would one continue to hammer mind numbingly away with verbiage that adds absolutely no value?

btk

Guest 09-21-2011 10:18 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 397032)
and I do so love when they re bashing a post or poster they do not agree with they continually use the phraseology such as "my white friend..." or my "tea party friend..." to be sure to get the talking point categorization goal(s) accomplished.

It is my favorite annoyance, among the many I have, and an annoyance to many participants that EVERYTHING/EVERYBODY has to be labeled...R or D or white or black or muslim or christian or what ever pigeon hole they are directed to work today, this week or month. How about just addressing the person, as you would in a public forum? Or the subject as one would in a public forum without all the partisan, race or religious qualifiers. It is just not the way most people communicate no matter the party, race or religion...they just don't.

And my general observation would be, it is either a partisan direction/objective or a lacking of depth of subject and or the language to be able to communicate adequately....my opinion. Why else would one continue to hammer mind numbingly away with verbiage that adds absolutely no value?

btk

How about just addressing the person, as you would in a public forum? Or the subject as one would in a public forum without all the partisan, race or religious qualifiers...If I remember correctly, this is what drew me to this forum in the first place...Recently it has become more of a pie throwing contest instead of a place to discuss, learn, and thereby solve some meat and potato differences...

Guest 09-21-2011 10:25 AM

excellent description of a discussion on the political forum by a few....."a pie throwing contest"....mind you using the acceptable pies that is!!

btk

Guest 09-21-2011 12:10 PM

Y'all try to make it so complicated:

In the order of 1st, 2nd and 2rd most racist party.

3rd the Democrats.

2nd the Republicans.

1st place racists the Tea Party.

Lets say it a different way.

The Democrats have very few racists.

The Republicans have a small amount of racists.

The Tea Parts has more non-racists than racists.

Does ye gits it now.

So, we all have our racists, but not as bad as some try to make it and not as non-existent as some try to make it.

Guest 09-21-2011 12:59 PM

I really believe y'all do not know the meaning of a bigot!!!!

big·ot
   [big-uht] Show IPA
noun
a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.

This definition gives you the benefit of the doubt that your narrow description of what you enjoy thinking others are is even acknowledged.

Bigots don't have to think. All they have to do is object/criticize/put down/make fun of anything they don't agree with from whom ever they please.
All of which is their right under the first amendment.

I do believe they subscribe to the notion that if you tell a lie often enough and loud enough you might get somebody to believe it....must be cause they certainly don't tire espousing the same old same old same old....eh?

btk

Guest 09-21-2011 01:03 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 397113)
I really believe y'all do not know the meaning of a bigot!!!!

big·ot
   [big-uht] Show IPA
noun
a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.

This definition gives you the benefit of the doubt that your narrow description of what you enjoy thinking others are is even acknowledged.

Bigots don't have to think. All they have to do is object/criticize/put down/make fun of anything they don't agree with from whom ever they please.
All of which is their right under the first amendment.

I do believe they subscribe to the notion that if you tell a lie often enough and loud enough you might get somebody to believe it....must be cause they certainly don't tire espousing the same old same old same old....eh?

btk

Very well stated and a perfect definition of the way I see Tea Party and Republican Extremists to include the 6 PAC on this political site. Thanks for the post. I hope they read and understand that when they address the liberals on this site, the above is exactly how they sound.

Guest 09-21-2011 01:09 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 397113)
I really believe y'all do not know the meaning of a bigot!!!!

big·ot
   [big-uht] Show IPA
noun
a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.

This definition gives you the benefit of the doubt that your narrow description of what you enjoy thinking others are is even acknowledged.

Bigots don't have to think. All they have to do is object/criticize/put down/make fun of anything they don't agree with from whom ever they please.
All of which is their right under the first amendment.

I do believe they subscribe to the notion that if you tell a lie often enough and loud enough you might get somebody to believe it....must be cause they certainly don't tire espousing the same old same old same old....eh?

btk

:1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl: I don't think some people have the sense that they were born with. LOL

Guest 09-21-2011 01:27 PM

they remind of those who shoot arrows into walls and then go about painting the bulls eye around the arrow and claiming their expertise at shooting....when in fact all they can do is....TALK.... oh and paint!!

btk

Guest 09-21-2011 01:44 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 397113)
I really believe y'all do not know the meaning of a bigot!!!!

big·ot
   [big-uht] Show IPA
noun
a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.

This definition gives you the benefit of the doubt that your narrow description of what you enjoy thinking others are is even acknowledged.

Bigots don't have to think. All they have to do is object/criticize/put down/make fun of anything they don't agree with from whom ever they please.
All of which is their right under the first amendment.

I do believe they subscribe to the notion that if you tell a lie often enough and loud enough you might get somebody to believe it....must be cause they certainly don't tire espousing the same old same old same old....eh?

btk

This pretty much describes everyone on the board at one time or another..and you know this is true.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.