Most progressives believe climate change created by man's carbon footprint is destroying the earth but they make claim that they don't believe voter fraud is real. So most progressives are voter fraud deniers.

It makes more sense to them that scientist can predict within a certainty the complicated processes going on within this universe but they unequivocally deny the tendency of a well supported documental facts that many government plan lotteries hedge funds, horse races, card games insurance plans, etc that there are people who desire and work endlessly to game the system for whatever reason.

Pleasee

Personal Best Regards:

Trump creates panel to investigate voter fraud
 

Trump creates panel to investigate voter fraud | PBS NewsHour

Vice Chair of Donald Trump's voter fraud commission has been successfully sued four times for voter suppression | The Independent

Totally illogical analogies and comparisons. A true candidate for the Dunning-Kruger effect.

Attachment 68584

Attachment 68585

Attachment 68586

Attachment 68587

Attachment 68588

But, but, but Hillary should have won. She had more California votes that Trump.

HILLARY is DEAD! Long live the KING!

And the Clintons continue to CON the leftards, taking their money under guise of the "RESISTANCE" movement. Just can't make that stuff up. She is a fool and the left is subsidizing it.

During the election that resulted in O's second term, ACORN was very active in Las Vegas. The (D) AG investigated and found widespread voter fraud. The last election that Dirty Harry won was also a farce. Harry was behind during the last week of the race. He cut a deal with the big casino owners, and thousands of illegal alien workers were bussed in shifts from the casinos to the polls. Harry won a squeaker.

Oh yes, and then there is a long history of Dem controlled funny elections in Chicago. And Tammany Hall in New York. My favorite of all time was Dem mayor Curly of Boston who was re-elected while behind bars serving time for corruption.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

Where in the world did you read this? :oops:

I lived it Vegas. Watched it happen. And I knew the governor and AG at the time.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

ACORN was a Dem "community organizing" group.
More Acorn Voter Fraud Comes to Light - WSJ
Nevada Vote Fraud Charges for ACORN - Capital Research Center
Here are a couple of links.

They liked to go to cemeteries and sign up dead people, or sign up illegals.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

Sorry, but I'm not buying biased anecdotal 'stories.'

Show a legitimate news source that states this is what actually happened...and I'll believe it then.

The fact that you said he won a "squeaker," yet the results show he won 50.2% to 44.5%...is the first clue you are exaggerating. :ohdear:

A reminder.....in 2004, the cries of voter fraud were in fact listened to and investigated. Republicans were sure it existed and when then Attorney General commissioned his US Attorneys to make this top priority.....

"Ashcroft commissioned the nation’s 93 U.S. attorneys to make voting fraud a priority of their offices. Over the next four years, those prosecutors launched more than 300 investigations. But in the end, the government had little to show for it. On July 26, 2006, the day before Bush signed a renewal of the Voting Rights Act, the Justice Department released a fact sheet summarizing the Voting Integrity Initiative’s accomplishments. Federal prosecutors had charged 119 people with election crimes and convicted just 86. The worst examples were vote-buying schemes in eastern Kentucky and West Virginia that helped keep local politicians in power. Cases that had fixated GOP officials—like the “major criminal enterprise” in St. Louis—were not substantiated. Instead, most of the cases involved individuals who had cast a single ballot that they shouldn’t have, or hadn’t even voted at all but simply had registered improperly. Some of them went to prison. At least one person was deported. The targets that ended up getting the most attention weren’t the alleged fraudsters but the handful of U.S. attorneys who didn’t push hard enough for prosecutions and were forced to resign.

“It’s remarkable that all of the U.S. attorneys had a mandate and were given adequate resources to raise this to the top of the pile,” says David Becker, who was a trial attorney in the voting section of the Justice Department until 2005 and is now executive director of the Center for Election Innovation and Research. “They all agree we found a handful of cases … and that was it.”



Pence has yet to launch his version of what Ashcroft attempted in 2002, and the very fact that the inquiry is not being run out of the Justice Department indicates that it might proceed very differently. But it wouldn’t be a waste of time for the former Indiana governor (who himself was accused of voter suppression in October) to spend some time studying what happened the last time a Republican administration went looking for a national web of illegal activity at the ballot box. If anything, the results of Pence’s commission might be even less spectacular than before. Elections experts say that’s because voter rolls are cleaner now than they were then, voting systems have been updated in many jurisdictions and stricter voter ID laws are in force. Yet, despite skepticism from high-ranking Republicans in Congress, some conservatives who were involved in the original investigation and who are pushing hardest for the new inquiry insist that the failure to prove widespread fraud is not evidence it doesn’t exist, only that the pursuit wasn’t aggressive enough. It’s a fixation that makes voting experts shake their heads.

“This has been done over and over again,” Becker says. “You don’t waste taxpayer resources without some evidence that an investigation is worthwhile. That’s called a fishing expedition.”


Why Republicans Can’t Find the Big Voter Fraud Conspiracy - POLITICO Magazine

Read the links I provided. And as far as Dirty Harry goes, the polls had him up 0.5% about a week before the election.

I saw the busses, I talked with a couple of casino bosses that I knew.

Nothing anecdotal about it.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

Yeah, OK...right. :1rotfl:

May I suggest you look up the definition of 'anecdotal,' especially given your statement of..... :ho:

BTW, NOTHING in your two links...supports your anecdotal accusations.

Yeah right.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

BTW - I doubt the SEIU, casinos or Dirty Harry were going to notify the local media about what was going on. Right, no links on that one.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro