Of course they would. Anybody else's money will do nicely, right?

Please provide a reference to where you obtained your (erroneous) information regarding elimination of food stamps. If you mean, we would like to eliminate the need for food stamps by providing an environment where anyone that wants to work, can work....maybe you are close.

Would you care to put the wars started by Democrats on a scale with those started by Republicans? I think you might be surprised. Also, while you are at it, why not add up the amount of American lives lost in combat during the Democrat started wars, compared to the amount lost in Republican started wars. BIG DIFFERENCE. Just statistics though. But, since you are comparing, I just thought I might give you something to think about. If it's not too difficult. I am sure that you will want me to do the research for you because we all know how needy and helpless you liberals are.

Ask Cheney and Crapweasel about starting an unnecessary war with their lies and explain that to the families of the 4500 Americans killed for nothing.

Now, The Canadian Anchor Baby want more Americans to lose their lives.

A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction.

Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peacetime, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea.

Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.

This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual -- is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.

Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.

In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.

Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.

The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded.

Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific technological elite.

It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system -- ever aiming toward the supreme goals of our free society.

Dwight D, Eisenhower

What did he mean? Who made the money on the wars after Korea? Who made the sacrifices?

Sure, sure. More of your ignorant ranting. 4500 lives compared to how many from any previous wars? Would you care to tally up all the millions of lives that Democrat started wars have taken? Vietnam was only 60,000 killed. Would you like to go back further? The further you go back the more the tally is. Go back and learn some new liberal talking points child.

Your asking to have him go beyond the talking points and what is allowed to be discussed?

No way!

I can answer these questions but I have a bias. How would you answer these questions?

Democrats started most of the wars and therefore are responsible for most of the deaths? Is that correct?


Which party ended the wars?


What group [mostly conservative or mostly liberal] or party would you put the War Protesters in?


Is there now a consensus that some wars were unjust?
Which wars?


Does it now mean if someone speaks up, saying they were against the unjust war, they are patriotic?

How would three liberals be able to achieve such a difficult task? That would be the whole club, right? That's kind of like asking how many liberals would it take to screw in a light bulb? Answer: It’s irrelevant; they still don’t know they’re in the dark! .....:1rotfl: