Posted by Guest (Post 1248948)

We have a President that is Muslim, changed his name so he could follow the religion of Islam, then declares he is a Christain for election purposes. He constantly belittles Christians for our feelings about Muslim's in general, yet he never belittles the Muslim's that treat women and girls in unspeakable ways, and refused to utter the words "radical Islamic extremists". To put a realistic twist on an old saying, "he is a Muslim in Christian clothing." This is not the leader we need to fight our battles.

Posted by Guest (Post 1248960)

Is that you posting Donald? Do not worry we Villagers will be in Cleveland to cover your back. We are chartering our buses and cleaning our guns and hope to have a large contingent so we can get a lot of TV coverage for all our friends and relatives up north to watch us on the TV.

One question Donald, why are you not allowing guns to be carried inside the convention hall? Ohio is an open carry state, so we expect to show up with our long guns slung over our shoulders.

Posted by Guest (Post 1248360)

A substantive question, perhaps?

What do you want? Is there a question there, other than "what's wrong with me?" that you seem to be asking? I doubt anyone can answer that part. If you are suggesting that war and law enforcement are too expensive so we should just ignore terrorism, then you do have a problem. America is weak, due to liberal pacifists. As ugly as war is, the best way to win is to allow the military to do their own thing. They know how to win wars. It is what they train for. It is why young men enlist, to win. Not to be nation building. When you have someone that wars against you, then you retaliate by crushing them with your power. You will have far less war if you show your might than if you try to talk to them. Muslims, in particular do not respect weakness and will take advantage of it. No one likes war, but we hate seeing our people die when that could have been avoided by crushing the opposition. The problem with our liberals is that they do not live in reality. They live like everyone wants to live in a dream world. The fact is that if they would get out of the way, our country would be safe again. Our military does not enjoy killing people, but they are good at it. We will have less or OURS dying if we allow them to do the job they trained to do. ALL of our military members volunteered/joined to fight for their country. That is what they prepare to do every day of their enlistment. War is hard and someone has to die. Let those that die be on the other side. Yes, civilians are collateral damage. You can't fight a war without civilian casualties. That's life, that's war. Accept it and quit making our military feel guilty for collateral damage.

If you want more bang for your tax money, then tell the gov to quit tying our military hands behind our backs and let them do what they were trained to do.

Posted by Guest (Post 1249012)

You do realize the FBI reads forums like this. They do have the authority to find out who YOU are. I am sure YOU would not like to be on an FBI watch list. Just saying. Take it anyway YOU want.

Posted by Guest (Post 1248267)

I'm not a veteran nor do I know much about military strategy but I am an expert at paying federal income taxes and had 44 years of experience doing so before I retired. I'm very curious how much we have paid for each bad guy or Isis fighter we have killed in the last 14 years. My guess is it is well over $20,000.00 a piece. Isis does not own a battleship of any kind, no fighter jets (not even a Piper Cub), no tanks, no Pentagon, no airbases, etc. Two weeks ago a lone radical Muslim killed 49 Americams and wounded as many. I have no idea what the cost to tax payers will be for all the police response that was required to stop him or the medical cost for all the wounded. He spent at most $1500.00 for his firearms and 250.00 for ammo. We have lost thousands of our own soldiers and have added thousands to those disabled for life. We have thousands with PTSD with no ides what the cost will be. On top of that we have paid for none of it, just passed it off to our grandchildren. Can someone tell me what I am missing.

Posted by Guest (Post 1248360)

A substantive question, perhaps?

What do you want? Is there a question there, other than "what's wrong with me?" that you seem to be asking? I doubt anyone can answer that part. If you are suggesting that war and law enforcement are too expensive so we should just ignore terrorism, then you do have a problem. America is weak, due to liberal pacifists. As ugly as war is, the best way to win is to allow the military to do their own thing. They know how to win wars. It is what they train for. It is why young men enlist, to win. Not to be nation building. When you have someone that wars against you, then you retaliate by crushing them with your power. You will have far less war if you show your might than if you try to talk to them. Muslims, in particular do not respect weakness and will take advantage of it. No one likes war, but we hate seeing our people die when that could have been avoided by crushing the opposition. The problem with our liberals is that they do not live in reality. They live like everyone wants to live in a dream world. The fact is that if they would get out of the way, our country would be safe again. Our military does not enjoy killing people, but they are good at it. We will have less or OURS dying if we allow them to do the job they trained to do. ALL of our military members volunteered/joined to fight for their country. That is what they prepare to do every day of their enlistment. War is hard and someone has to die. Let those that die be on the other side. Yes, civilians are collateral damage. You can't fight a war without civilian casualties. That's life, that's war. Accept it and quit making our military feel guilty for collateral damage.

If you want more bang for your tax money, then tell the gov to quit tying our military hands behind our backs and let them do what they were trained to do.

Posted by Guest (Post 1249028)

You have such a simple answer, but here is your hero trumps answer. Elect me and I will get rid of isis in 24 hours, problem solved. LOL

Posted by Guest (Post 1249026)

Take a look at history, it has been this way through time. Now there is a different way to conduct war, meaning suicide bombers ect.

Posted by Guest (Post 1249032)

And, Hillary's is apparently the same as Loretta Lynch's, "Compassion and Understanding". Or maybe the ISIS terrorists just need more job opportunities as others on the left have suggested?

Posted by Guest (Post 1249017)

Added to the FBI watch list for posting on Talk of the Villages Forum? You are delusional!

Posted by Guest (Post 1249065)

“We stand with you to say that the good in this world far outweighs the evil, that our common humanity transcends our differences, and that our most effective response to terror and to hatred is compassion, it’s unity, and it’s love,” Lynch said. “We stand with you today as we grieve together, and long after the cameras are gone, we will continue to stand with you as we grow together in commitment, in solidarity, and in equality.”


In your opinion what effective responses to terrorism have worked in the past that we should repeat in the present?

Posted by Guest (Post 1249026)

Take a look at history, it has been this way through time. Now there is a different way to conduct war, meaning suicide bombers ect.

Posted by Guest (Post 1249068)

Why not take a trip to Syria and spread your "compassion and love" to the ISIS fighters? Oh, and have your next of kin let us know how it worked out for you.

Posted by Guest (Post 1249012)

You do realize the FBI reads forums like this. They do have the authority to find out who YOU are. I am sure YOU would not like to be on an FBI watch list. Just saying. Take it anyway YOU want.