Posted by Guest (Post 1121731)

My questions don't have anything to do with the thread "falling poll numbers". Your question about what the Tea Party stands for is right on point of this thread. I asked several questions that were right on point about the Tea Party affect on the Republican Party, and you didn't answer. I wonder why? Is it that the truth hurts?

That is all you have to know about the Tea Party. The Constitution, that they always tout, states that the majority rules. They are not in the majority, but want to get their way on everything. If they don't get their way, they make it difficult, if not impossible, to get anything done. That is what the Tea Party is. They always want to take their ball, and go home. If we don't get our way, we are going to shut down the government. How many times have they threaten that.?

Posted by Guest (Post 1121755)

First the Tea Party, perhaps the official members, may not have a distinct majority but listen up.....the conservative Republican party does hold a very wide advantage in both houses of congress. They keep being by passed by our President, and I will leave it to the constitutional scholars as to how much that has hurt this country.

To you I want to say that I, personally am tired of you playing the poor soul. You keep harping and harping how the big bad Republicans on here do not give our President any credit.

Have you read any of the threads on economics ? Have you heard much, you will find some, criticism of him in the arena of economics ?

Basically, he is being criticized soundly for foreign affairs and his total lack of any statesmanship both national or international.

Listen, grow up...HE IS THE PRESIDENT. When have you ever heard of a President not being criticized ? I am sick of the "oh poor me" attitude when he is criticized. I am tired of the bringing out all the nasty, silly phrases because he is criticized ?

So please stop the oh poor me stuff......if you do not like the Tea Party and a strict interpetion of the constitution, then say so and explain why, but do not always use the backdrop of how unfair everyone is to the President.

Discuss issues. I do not think, and I could be wrong, see your post on any of the threads concerning the Syria situation, the emergence of the group Black Lives Matter from the marxist roots, the bypassing of congress on a number of issues, the fact that no matter what we do in the USA, it has NO CHANCE of effecting anything at all relative to the environment. You harp on only one issue pretty much and we are faced with so many things in this country...if the Tea Party and a perception of the President being picked on are what you car about, you will not get a lot of traction on this or any other forum.

Posted by Guest (Post 1121755)

First the Tea Party, perhaps the official members, may not have a distinct majority but listen up.....the conservative Republican party does hold a very wide advantage in both houses of congress. They keep being by passed by our President, and I will leave it to the constitutional scholars as to how much that has hurt this country.

To you I want to say that I, personally am tired of you playing the poor soul. You keep harping and harping how the big bad Republicans on here do not give our President any credit.

Have you read any of the threads on economics ? Have you heard much, you will find some, criticism of him in the arena of economics ?

Basically, he is being criticized soundly for foreign affairs and his total lack of any statesmanship both national or international.



Listen, grow up...HE IS THE PRESIDENT. When have you ever heard of a President not being criticized ? I am sick of the "oh poor me" attitude when he is criticized. I am tired of the bringing out all the nasty, silly phrases because he is criticized ?

So please stop the oh poor me stuff......if you do not like the Tea Party and a strict interpetion of the constitution, then say so and explain why, but do not always use the backdrop of how unfair everyone is to the President.

Discuss issues. I do not think, and I could be wrong, see your post on any of the threads concerning the Syria situation, the emergence of the group Black Lives Matter from the marxist roots, the bypassing of congress on a number of issues, the fact that no matter what we do in the USA, it has NO CHANCE of effecting anything at all relative to the environment. You harp on only one issue pretty much and we are faced with so many things in this country...if the Tea Party and a perception of the President being picked on are what you car about, you will not get a lot of traction on this or any other forum.

Posted by Guest (Post 1121785)

Take your poor soul nonsense, and stick it. This coming from a victim of the crimes against humanity perpetrated by Obama. That is precious.

Have I ever heard of a president being criticized? Of course, I have. Have you ever heard of a party writing a letter to an enemy leader telling him to ignore an agreement negotiated by six countries which we were one? The people that wrote the letter hadn't even seen the agreement. Open you bleepin eyes.

You want to talk about Syria start here.
John Kerry: Critics of Obama's Syria decision are 'dead wrong' - POLITICO

The Republicans were not going to approve the red in drawn in the sand. Take a look at the foreign section of the Tea Party article from Wikipedia. They were against sending the military into Syria. They keep on criticizing Obama for not holding true on his red line in the sand. That is the height of hypocrisy.

Concerning the article above, Kerry was grilled on Morning Joe by a female "W" press spokesman. He wasn't given a free ride on anything that he said. The questions concerning Syria were right on point.

He also said that, if Assad keep his chemical weapons, ISIS would be in possession of them now. Working together with Russia got the chemical weapons out of there. Since that was the goal, what the hell is the problem?

Obama bypassed Congress on immigration reform. The Senate approved bipartisan immigration bill, and not one that had several Republican votes, so it could be called bipartisan. The Hastert rule prevented Boehner from putting the bill on the floor for a vote. There was a general feeling that the bill would have passed. When it was clear that the House wasn't going to act, the president did.

Take a look at the economics section of the Wikipedia report on the Tea Party. The Tea Party was against "W's" bailing out the big banks. Do they have any idea what would have happen, if he allowed the banks to fail?

Posted by Guest (Post 1121788)

I am done with this guy...thats it...he can chortle to himself.

He just wanders all over the lot with little phrases. I am done with this guy.

Only thing that I compliment is his passion about supporting this administration....love the passion, think he is mostly wrong however.

Posted by Guest (Post 1121823)

Thank you for ignoring me.

I am all over the place. Maybe, because I take guilt by silence seriously. Trying to answer all the stupid questions thrown me has me all over the place, because it is impossible to tie anyone here down to one subject.

As soon as you push them into a corner, they either disappear or change the subject. Have you ever noticed how many threads I have ended?

Gandhi said the following, "First they ignore you, then they make fun of you, then they fight you, then you win". I am not patting myself on the back. I am laughing at you, because this really applies here.

It would nice once just once someone here gave the president credit for something positive that has happened in the past 6+ years, but we know that is not going to happen. If you are talking about the passion, how about the passion of never giving Obama credit for anything!

Posted by Guest (Post 1121823)

Thank you for ignoring me.

I am all over the place. Maybe, because I take guilt by silence seriously. Trying to answer all the stupid questions thrown me has me all over the place, because it is impossible to tie anyone here down to one subject.

As soon as you push them into a corner, they either disappear or change the subject. Have you ever noticed how many threads I have ended?

Gandhi said the following, "First they ignore you, then they make fun of you, then they fight you, then you win". I am not patting myself on the back. I am laughing at you, because this really applies here.

It would nice once just once someone here gave the president credit for something positive that has happened in the past 6+ years, but we know that is not going to happen. If you are talking about the passion, how about the passion of never giving Obama credit for anything!

Posted by Guest (Post 1120688)

Another Huffington Post follower. Try to use your own mind for a change. I realize that would be difficult for you considering you have been taught to be a follower and let the gov take care of you.

Regressive = becoming less advanced; returning to a former or less developed state.

Liberals= socialist
Socialism : a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
synonyms: leftism, welfarism; More
radicalism, progressivism, social democracy;
communism, Marxism, labor movement
policy or practice based on the political and economic theory of socialism.
synonyms: leftism, welfarism; More
radicalism, progressivism, social democracy;
communism, Marxism, labor movement
(in Marxist theory) a transitional social state between the overthrow of capitalism and the realization of communism.

"Modern socialism originated from an 18th-century intellectual and working-class political movement that criticised the effects of industrialisation and private property on society"


So, in truth it is the liberals/socialists that are the "regressives" not the Republicans.

But today's liberals/socialists are kept completely and blindly in the dark by their masters. Yes, masters. After all, your party is the part of Slaves.

So, if you are going to post with your derisive remarks, at least have some substance or facts to make your comments a bit more credible. Perhaps you would be better at convincing school kids of your progressive (ha, ha) theories. We'll keep your secret for you, that your ideas are OLD and FAILED ideology that is recycled with a new label.

If you are going to parrot Huffington Post's direction to label conservatives with the label "regressive" you might want to add a bit of your own research before blindly FOLLOWING a bunch of foreign losers.

Remember:
Socialism/liberalism is the ideology of Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, etc and we see how that worked out. Nazis gone. USSR gone. Losers!!

Posted by Guest (Post 1121942)

6 million Jewish people died because of the media leading them during the holocaust! Communism does not work! Wake up America ...Trump is GODs trump card!

Posted by Guest (Post 1121962)

Mr Trump is not the answer to anything.

Please the Republican Party is going to blow such an opportunity if the do not get off this guys bandwagon.

You complain about the guy in the WH for pandering....that is exactly what Trump is doing. He would be great in a bar room conversation, where facts are less important than mouth.

Posted by Guest (Post 1122003)

Your words are empty to the Christian and the Jewish!

Posted by Guest (Post 1122008)

My words are empty to many I fear !

However, with pretty much total certainty I feel comfortable telling you that you surely do not want him as your President, and since you see things in a religious scene, please, please do some reading.

Trump is selling...that is what he does. YOU are being sold !

Posted by Guest (Post 1121962)

Mr Trump is not the answer to anything.

Please the Republican Party is going to blow such an opportunity if the do not get off this guys bandwagon.

You complain about the guy in the WH for pandering....that is exactly what Trump is doing. He would be great in a bar room conversation, where facts are less important than mouth.

Posted by Guest (Post 1122003)

Your words are empty to the Christian and the Jewish!