Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, Political talk (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/)
-   -   Federal employees in Romney Plan (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/federal-employees-romney-plan-54344/)

Guest 06-04-2012 06:00 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 500979)
It's just a fact that the benefits are lifetime benefits. Numbers?; we doan need no stinkin' numbers!

Seems we've got lots of people getting their worry free lifetime benefits that I've offended. Oh well.

Not offending me at all. Two government pension checks for me, one bigger one for my wife and both on Social Security. Life is Good. :kiss:

Guest 06-04-2012 06:03 AM

40% higher? Not in my case.

Contractors are costing us a lot more than government civilians, where I work. I took a pay CUT for this job. Why? Because it gives me something the private sector doesn't. Time. I am not expected to work 60 hours and be paid for 40. I get decent time-off policies (though only about equivalent to a secretary in Germany). I get sick leave *and* vacation time - unlike the way my previous employer (a national defense contractor) deliberately mislead me on my offer letter (saying I had 10 days vacation plus sick time - and when I took 2 sick days for the flu, found out I had 2 less vacation days than I thought).

If I worked for the private sector, I could be making as much as 25% more than I am now. But, by the same token, I won't be getting a phone call at 6:30am telling me not to go into the office anymore because my contract has been cut (for reasons that were completely made up, cutting me two weeks after telling me my contract was being extended).

What I've noticed in the past 20 years is an increasing probability of companies treating their employees like cattle. This "race to the bottom" in commodotizing *people* has had a number of effects on the workforce. Loyalty is unheard of anymore, just for ONE example.

Pensions? When you company gets bought out, the pension bled off to the Board of Directors and bankruptcy is filed, see where that leaves you..

Guest 06-04-2012 08:13 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 501144)
40% higher? Not in my case.

Contractors are costing us a lot more than government civilians, where I work. I took a pay CUT for this job. Why? Because it gives me something the private sector doesn't. Time. I am not expected to work 60 hours and be paid for 40. I get decent time-off policies (though only about equivalent to a secretary in Germany). I get sick leave *and* vacation time - unlike the way my previous employer (a national defense contractor) deliberately mislead me on my offer letter (saying I had 10 days vacation plus sick time - and when I took 2 sick days for the flu, found out I had 2 less vacation days than I thought).

If I worked for the private sector, I could be making as much as 25% more than I am now. But, by the same token, I won't be getting a phone call at 6:30am telling me not to go into the office anymore because my contract has been cut (for reasons that were completely made up, cutting me two weeks after telling me my contract was being extended).

What I've noticed in the past 20 years is an increasing probability of companies treating their employees like cattle. This "race to the bottom" in commodotizing *people* has had a number of effects on the workforce. Loyalty is unheard of anymore, just for ONE example.

Pensions? When you company gets bought out, the pension bled off to the Board of Directors and bankruptcy is filed, see where that leaves you..

I can't disagree with your observation on the lack of loyalty in private enterprise. I also worked for a company that was under a huge corporate umbrella, and while the company knew the value of the workers under their supervision, they had to follow the direction of the suits at corporate. The lower and middle management had to worry a lot more than we union workers when corporate got a bee in their bonnet.

In my case the pensions belong to, and are under the control of the Union. Corporate has no hold on them.

Guest 06-04-2012 08:42 AM

Great Post!
 
Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 500924)
DG, I think I understand where you are coming from. I served in our military and have two sons and one son-in-law who did the same. One of my sons is now In Afghanistan (again) and on the front lines with the 82nd Airborne. My mother and two of my sisters were Federal Civil Service employees.

Leaving aside the issue of whether or not Civil Service employees are paid more than their civilian counterparts (I believe they are, you and B1 believe they are not), we need to look at how much government we can afford and how those funds are being expended. Today, Federal expenditures are more than 24% of our GDP, a level not seen since WWII. At our times of greatest prosperity, they were under 20%. We need to get back to those levels to return to prosperity.

No one is saying that working for the government is easy, it's not. The questions that need to be asked are; (1) do we still need to do what we have been doing? (2) Is what we are doing a net benefit to the American people? (3) Is there an entirely different way to accomplish what we are doing? (4) Is this really the responsibility of the American people or is intended to benefit a select group? (5) Are we effectively doing that which we set out to do? (6) Is this service still really necessary?

The examples that can be cited are numerous. Let's look at a two. Fraud is believed to be rampant in Medicare. A private industry where fraud is a great problem is the credit card industry. AMEX, Visa and Master Card have extensive fraud detection and prevention systems. When my wife died recently, I contacted Social Security immediately as well as her supplement provider. I was informed by her supplement provider that had I not done so, Social Security would have let them know in 90 to 120 days. By contrast, when I made a purchase that was unusual for me in Georgia a few months ago, my credit card provider had me on the phone before I could leave the store! It is not that our government has less conscientious people, but rather that Master Card has better fraud detection and thereby fraud prevention systems.

Our Postal system is a wreck. They are doing the same things the same way that they did years ago. They lost their most profitable operation to FedEx and UPS because they refused to adapt even when the need to change was clear. They still do not compete. Priority mail is a joke. If the package is too large to fit in the boxes at our mail station, they put a notification in my mail slot and tell me I can pick it up the next day. UPS delivers it. ditto FedEx. Why would I ever go back to a slower, unreliable service?

Constant change is essential to a private companies survival. Of the 100 largest companies in the year 1900, only one remains in business today - General Electric. How many government agencies go out of business because there is a better way for the need to be met?

I would hope our government employees will be concerned for our future generations and accept that change must come about.

:BigApplause::BigApplause::BigApplause:

Guest 06-04-2012 11:59 AM

an awful lot of suggestion that if one is either a federal employee or union member they are beholding to the democratic party. I am sure that is a myth the faithful are expected to believe and continue to parrot.

I wonder if any of the current 15,000,000 unemployed are union members?

Or how many of the millions who have given up all hopes of finding a job are union members?

Now just how does the democratic party insulate themselves from any responsible for the current, long term (over three years) unemployed union members?

btk

Guest 06-04-2012 01:09 PM

From January of 2012 BEFORE a Republican candidate was decided.....from a site...

"Purpose of this Site

FedSmith.com is an information portal for sources of information impacting the federal community and those interested in the Federal Government's activities. The site provides links to daily news headlines, original articles from our writers, and Federal Retirement information including TSP rates and information. We use our extensive experience in working with the Federal sector to provide news items of interest each day."



"Many outside of government automatically assume the federal workforce is an automatic voting bloc and supports the candidates supported by federal employee unions (almost all of whom are Democrats) and that federal employees have a defined point of view on political issues. It is easy to see why this is the case. Most press releases and publicity reflects the views of the organizations who purport to speak for these 2.7 million or so federal employees who work for the executive branch of government (that figure includes the Postal ServThis latest survey surprised us. We know that there is tremendous interest in the upcoming election. Still, we were surprised that about 9000 of our readers took the time to participate. The interest in this year's election is obviously intense.

"In reality, our surveys have demonstrated over the past few years that federal employees vote very much like the rest of the American public."


"This poll is of particular interest as most of those who are giving their opinion ultimately work for the President of the United States. In effect, it is a chance for them to voice an opinion of how their boss is performing.ice but excludes the military)."


"If the election were held today, would you vote to re-elect Barack Obama for president?

Yes: 41.8%
No: 58.2%"


News Articles: Federal Employee Preferences: 58% Would Not Vote for President Obama

Those who worked for the Federal Govt may have goods or bads on the site !!!

Guest 06-04-2012 01:51 PM

As a retired Civil Service Electronics Engineer who worked for the Department of the Navy in test and Evaluation, we were always paid less than contractors. People who think Feds make more do not compare professions and compare Engineers to Engineers, Medical Doctors to Medical Doctors, etc.
I am under the CSRS retirement system, I do not get a separate Social Security payment, and My TSP contributions were limited to 5% with no match. I pay pretty much half of the Health Insurance bill, and 100% of Dental and Long-term care insurance.

We were always supporting the Republican's who are pro-defense. Obama killed a major program here, the new Presidential Hellicopter, many jobs in contractor community lost.

The Postal Service is an independent company, they get no federal funds.

Guest 06-04-2012 04:14 PM

If this thread does nothing else it proves that this is a subject that a broad brush does not work on.

We all take a path chosen long ago in hopes that we can live in a place like TV and enjoy the rest of our lives.

Congrats to you who are there and I hope my path will get me there.

P.S. When Obama says he just wants it all to be fair and give everybody an equal share, do you think he includes private vs public? Hmmmm???

Guest 06-04-2012 05:59 PM

Please provide a link to the quotation of President Obama in which you stated, "When Obama says he just wants it all to be fair and give everybody an equal share, do you think he includes private vs public?"

Guest 06-04-2012 07:02 PM

Quote:

Please provide a link to the quotation of President Obama in which you stated, "When Obama says he just wants it all to be fair and give everybody an equal share, do you think he includes private vs public?"


Sorry, had to go do some work so I can become one of those evil rich but back now.

Here is one for starters but I must say that you having to ask for proof that he has said this, or something very close to this would lead me to believe that you have been living in outer space and just got back today.
By the way I did not "quote" Obama I paraphrased.

Obama wants people to have "fair chance and fair shot" - Charleston, SC | Breaking News, Sports, Weather

Guest 06-05-2012 06:45 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 501512)
Sorry, had to go do some work so I can become one of those evil rich but back now.

Here is one for starters but I must say that you having to ask for proof that he has said this, or something very close to this would lead me to believe that you have been living in outer space and just got back today.
By the way I did not "quote" Obama I paraphrased.

Obama wants people to have "fair chance and fair shot" - Charleston, SC | Breaking News, Sports, Weather

That was a very good link that you provided. Thank you for that. In your post, your paraphrase said Pres. Obama said he wanted everyone to have an equal share. That is NOT what the link said at all. A "fair chance and fair shot" does not say "equal share" in any languange.

Guest 06-05-2012 07:24 AM

Even the headline gets it wrong
 
The president is quoted as saying "a fair shot and a fair share" in the article. Whoever wrote the artice made the headline " a fair chance and a fair shot".

Guest 06-05-2012 07:59 AM

As usual the post is going off track and I take part blame for for that. However I think that the Pres. has made it very clear that Equality by shifting money is his goal, not a fair chance or fair shot.
I think people have a fair shot now and some that think they don't actually have better than a fair shot. I think they are too busy telling everybody how unfair it is that they don't have time to see their "Fair Chance".

People who think we will all be better when we all are paid the same and make the same amount of money are just living in a world that does not exist and I hope never does!

Why would people step out on a limb if they get paid the same as someone who barely shows up. It will never be "equal" even though that is what the left wants.
People with good ideas make money, those with a chip on their shoulder or a government out there telling them "we got your back" are just going to get what the government wants to give them.

As far as government pay, I only care because my taxes pay for that and I have no choice in the matter when it comes to buying governments products. In the public sector I get to make that choice. So if government decides to pump up the pay for their employees it cost me so I think it should be based on what the "going rate" is.

I know that all government employees don't make 40% higher than the public does but I also know that government wastes money, my money at a rate that is obscence!
Every new program to make sure everyone is getting their fair share brings in new waste and employees. And by the way, what is meant by Fair Share.
It is said as if what someone else has earned belongs to the collective! It is not to be shared, it is to be earned. Unless you want to give it away and then that is the persons choice.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.