Talk of The Villages Florida - Rentals, Entertainment & More
Talk of The Villages Florida - Rentals, Entertainment & More
#16
|
|||
|
|||
That, and the historical trend that except for Reagan, Reagan, Bush sr., neither party has held the White House for more than 8 years since WWII
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
There are currently 31 Republicans, 18 Democrats, and one independent that hold the office of governor in the states. Additionally, two Republicans, two Independents and two Democrats (one is also a member of the PPD) serve as governors of United States Territories and Mayor of the District of Columbia. Republicans hold a majority in Congress and the Senate. This conservative trend has happened during Obama's reign, so obviously the VOTING MAJORITY in our country is trending with "These Reactionary Village Yapsters" |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
As far as numbers are concerned, I was an accountant. My first class in Accounting, the professor asked, "How much is one and one?" His answer was, "whatever you want it to be". The saying goes, figures lie, and liars figure. They probably could balance the budget by just horsing with numbers. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
The reason there is no budget is because it is a commitment!
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
The numbers can appear as you wish. But, how high has Obama's numbers ever been in his two terms? He may not have gone as low as Bush did when the Demcorats advanced the perception that it was his fault (with a democrat majority congress for his last two years) that the economy tanked, but Bush had a high of 90%. Obama has had a high of 69%. Does anyone expect Obama's numbers to ever go any higher? Will they reach 90% ever?
Like I said, Bush has had the highest and the lowest of numbers. Obama has bested the mediocre. It's just all numbers. Poll numbers can't even predict elections very often. I think that closest numbers in a polling prediction has been Rasmussen, but I am not positive. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Next year. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
If there was a ticking time bomb at the Super Bowl, wouldn't you want the bomb squad to try 60 times to defuse it??
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
That's a good analogy.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Obama's numbers aren't going down in 2016 by something that he will do. It is an election year, and nothing is going to get done in government. If the economy takes a deep slid, which is beyond his control, his numbers will gone down. However, time as shown by "W's" numbers will go back again. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
No. I would get the hell out of there, because the bomb squad doesn't have a clue what they are doing. My team is going to the Super Bowl, and going to win it. There won't be the deflated ball nonsense to try to say they had to cheat to win.
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Great, another Panther fan. You did say your team was going to win it,and we do know that the Panthers are going to win.
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Only a bumbling inefficient bomb squad would take 60 times. You would want one who did it the first time.
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Freebies is a nonsense term---are you suggesting the freeloaders WORK for what they get? Please, please put that glass of Kool-Aid down |
|
|
Thread Tools | |