I am not very conversant on the Global Warming situation but wonder if those who are see any credence in this...

"When future generations look back on the global-warming scare of the past 30 years, nothing will shock them more than the extent to which the official temperature records – on which the entire panic ultimately rested – were systematically “adjusted” to show the Earth as having warmed much more than the actual data justified.
Two weeks ago, under the headline “How we are being tricked by flawed data on global warming”, I wrote about Paul Homewood, who, on his Notalotofpeopleknowthat blog, had checked the published temperature graphs for three weather stations in Paraguay against the temperatures that had originally been recorded. In each instance, the actual trend of 60 years of data had been dramatically reversed, so that a cooling trend was changed to one that showed a marked warming.
This was only the latest of many examples of a practice long recognised by expert observers around the world – one that raises an ever larger question mark over the entire official surface-temperature record.

The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever - Telegraph

Read this explanation from Climatologists that refute the claims made in the link you provided.

Kevin Cowtan Debunks Christopher Booker's Temperature Conspiracy Theory

Originally Posted by Guest

Read this explanation from Climatologists that refute the claims made in the link you provided.

Kevin Cowtan Debunks Christopher Booker's Temperature Conspiracy Theory

Thank you. This debate just rages on and on

No non-Partisan, thinking person who relies on scientific fact and data can possibly still claim to refute the facts of climate change. Industrialists with a vested interest in getting rid of regulations re: emissions, pollution, etc. have spent millions to convince people to refute legitimate unbiased science, and bought quasi scientists to produce faux science. Many sheep have, and continue to, follow these false prophets.

Originally Posted by Guest

No non-Partisan, thinking person who relies on scientific fact and data can possibly still claim to refute the facts of climate change...

Couldn't agree more. Now all we have to do is agree upon exactly what those facts are.

Originally Posted by Polar Bear

Couldn't agree more. Now all we have to do is agree upon exactly what those facts are.

If anyone on this forum should be concerned, It is the Polar Bear.

Check out photographs of the glaciers in Alaska from 30 years ago. Better hurry and book your cruise up north. It's not Global Warming it's just Warming.