Easy Way

 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 04-03-2017, 07:52 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default Easy Way

The cowardly US Senate has a way to even their playing field.

If you cannot get the 60 votes or more to get Neil Gosuck to be a Supreme Court justice - just change the rules! A simple majority instead of 60 votes.
  #2  
Old 04-03-2017, 09:03 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandtrap328 View Post
The cowardly US Senate has a way to even their playing field.



If you cannot get the 60 votes or more to get Neil Gosuck to be a Supreme Court justice - just change the rules! A simple majority instead of 60 votes.


And Dirty Harry Reed initiated this change for all positions below SCOTUS appointees. It really is a shame, but what goes around comes around.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
  #3  
Old 04-03-2017, 10:24 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
And Dirty Harry Reed initiated this change for all positions below SCOTUS appointees. It really is a shame, but what goes around comes around.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
YEP, and that's politics....dirty. And I agree with it. Reid was dispicable and nasty. Schumer is attempting to be worse. When Reid went Nuclear, he was warned but didn't heed the advice from others. Now, it is being turned into an all out war, thanks to Reid and now Schumer. It's sad, but predictable.

No other SCOTUS nominee vote has been filibustered either. If they do then that will be another idea that can eventually come back to bite them in the rears.
  #4  
Old 04-03-2017, 11:43 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
YEP, and that's politics....dirty. And I agree with it. Reid was dispicable and nasty. Schumer is attempting to be worse. When Reid went Nuclear, he was warned but didn't heed the advice from others. Now, it is being turned into an all out war, thanks to Reid and now Schumer. It's sad, but predictable.

No other SCOTUS nominee vote has been filibustered either. If they do then that will be another idea that can eventually come back to bite them in the rears.
Hopefully, Gosuck will turn out to be like John Roberts. If any of the REGRESSIVES remember. It was Roberts who declared the mandate on Obamacare to be a tax and therefore CONSTITUTIONAL.
  #5  
Old 04-03-2017, 02:05 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Hopefully, Gosuck will turn out to be like John Roberts. If any of the REGRESSIVES remember. It was Roberts who declared the mandate on Obamacare to be a tax and therefore CONSTITUTIONAL.
Listen to the SOCIALIST calling someone else a Regressive... You can't get much more Regressive than a Socialist. If you are going to allow a communist, Soros to lead you, then you better think about how great it will be to live in the USSR.
  #6  
Old 04-03-2017, 02:47 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Listen to the SOCIALIST calling someone else a Regressive... You can't get much more Regressive than a Socialist. If you are going to allow a communist, Soros to lead you, then you better think about how great it will be to live in the USSR.

You seem to be trying the Alinsky maneuver of DEFLECTION with your ridiculous posting.

The posting is about the confirmation effort of judge Neil Gosuck and not what your swiss cheese brain cannot remember about progressives and REGRESSIVES.

Now, MDLBQ, either stay on track or stay the heck off the forum.
  #7  
Old 04-03-2017, 03:17 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
You seem to be trying the Alinsky maneuver of DEFLECTION with your ridiculous posting.

The posting is about the confirmation effort of judge Neil Gosuck and not what your swiss cheese brain cannot remember about progressives and REGRESSIVES.

Now, MDLBQ, either stay on track or stay the heck off the forum.
Damn! You got 6 or 7 of Alinsky's rules in THREE SENTENCES! Pretty impressive.
Unfortunately, one of them is “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.”
  #8  
Old 04-03-2017, 05:09 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Listen to the SOCIALIST calling someone else a Regressive... You can't get much more Regressive than a Socialist. If you are going to allow a communist, Soros to lead you, then you better think about how great it will be to live in the USSR.
They are not "Regressive", they are communist's, just read what donny has to say about his hero putin. He loves the russian assassin.

Donald Trump on Vladimir Putin: In his own words - CNNPolitics.com
  #9  
Old 04-03-2017, 06:21 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dave harris View Post
They are not "Regressive", they are communist's, just read what donny has to say about his hero putin. He loves the russian assassin.



Donald Trump on Vladimir Putin: In his own words - CNNPolitics.com


I think Ted Turner has about committed seppuku by this time.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
  #10  
Old 04-04-2017, 04:34 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
You seem to be trying the Alinsky maneuver of DEFLECTION with your ridiculous posting.

The posting is about the confirmation effort of judge Neil Gosuck and not what your swiss cheese brain cannot remember about progressives and REGRESSIVES.

Now, MDLBQ, either stay on track or stay the heck off the forum.
Sandy, Sandy, Sandy........you make a silly comment and then get bent out of shape when someone responds to it. Try to follow along. You incorrectly used the term REGRESSIVE and I called you on it.

Give me a hint, what makes you think you can order someone to stay off the forum? Little people like you should hardly be ordering anyone about. If communist bothers you (it should) then you socialists shouldn't be following the orders of Soros. Just saying. I can understand your concern. It must be disastrous to your side's plan to think that you almost was able to pervert America into your idea of the great European Socialist (regressive) order, and America saw the writing on the wall and put a stop to it. Looks like you won't get that Obama's Socialist Utopia after all. It would have benefited your side to be able to stack the Supreme Court for your (or Soros) radical agenda. Gorsuch will be confirmed and your radical side will lose more votes in the next election. You can thank Reid for the nuclear option. Remember what goes around, comes around and bites one in the @ss. And this one is definitely going to bite some leftards in the posterior.
  #11  
Old 04-04-2017, 06:47 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

you can tell a lot by how a person uses or misuses words and what they say about a person.

Take for instance on this thread Neil Gorsuch by any standard or measure is considered to be a respectful and caring human being. He is by definition referred to as a gentleman. Yet progressive have made reference to his last name in a shameful, hateful and and disrespectful manner.

Mike Pence once explained that he would not attend an event, especially one serving alcohol without being in the presence with his wife. And leave it to progressives to twist that noble gesture as being one as illegal (discriminatory)

I am certain, and thankful that not all progressives are this hateful, disrespectful or immoral any of the preceding that may cause such abusive invectives but one is too many

Indeed Trump Derangement syndrome is driving these progressives into sheer madness

Personal Best Regards:
 

Tags
court, supreme, easy

Thread Tools

You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:37 PM.