Hillary and DNC committed another felony

 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-30-2016, 05:26 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default Hillary and DNC committed another felony

8 U.S. Code § 1324

Invited an illegal alien to speak at the convention. Even the daughter said on nationwide TV that her mother was an illegal.

And the Clintons just keep piling them up.

Can we start using the Clinton defense/precedent if we get charged with going over 20mph in our golf carts?
  #2  
Old 07-30-2016, 05:31 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
8 U.S. Code § 1324

Invited an illegal alien to speak at the convention. Even the daughter said on nationwide TV that her mother was an illegal.

And the Clintons just keep piling them up.

Can we start using the Clinton defense/precedent if we get charged with going over 20mph in our golf carts?
Did this make your day?
  #3  
Old 07-30-2016, 05:39 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
8 U.S. Code § 1324

Invited an illegal alien to speak at the convention. Even the daughter said on nationwide TV that her mother was an illegal.

And the Clintons just keep piling them up.

Can we start using the Clinton defense/precedent if we get charged with going over 20mph in our golf carts?
Since you are an expert on this, "Donald Trump's call on Russia to hack Hillary Clinton's emails has shocked, flabbergasted and appalled lawmakers and national security experts across the political spectrum, with one saying it was "tantamount to treason."

What would your penalty for this be, soap in his mouth?
  #4  
Old 07-30-2016, 06:16 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Since you are an expert on this, "Donald Trump's call on Russia to hack Hillary Clinton's emails has shocked, flabbergasted and appalled lawmakers and national security experts across the political spectrum, with one saying it was "tantamount to treason."

What would your penalty for this be, soap in his mouth?
A fitting penalty would be castration; however, there is nothing down there to cut off.
  #5  
Old 07-30-2016, 06:17 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Since you are an expert on this, "Donald Trump's call on Russia to hack Hillary Clinton's emails has shocked, flabbergasted and appalled lawmakers and national security experts across the political spectrum, with one saying it was "tantamount to treason."

What would your penalty for this be, soap in his mouth?
If you weren't so ignorant, you would have at least listened to his words, so you would know what you are talking about instead of looking stupid. Yep, ****. He did not call on Russia to hack anything. That's just part of your liberal talking points.

And if you weren't so stupid, you would know that her sever is a private server (not even in operation now) so if not gov property then it can't be construed as treason EVEN if he did conspire with Russia.

So, please instead of deflecting toward Trump, if you have a comment about Clinton, go for it. Don't be such a sissy.
  #6  
Old 07-30-2016, 06:18 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
A fitting penalty would be castration; however, there is nothing down there to cut off.
Are you sure???
  #7  
Old 07-30-2016, 06:20 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Did this make your day?
Thank you for asking, but criminal activity does not make my day. Hope it didn't ruin your day. Obviously, you are a supporter of crooked HELLary.
  #8  
Old 07-30-2016, 07:31 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Thank you for asking, but criminal activity does not make my day. Hope it didn't ruin your day. Obviously, you are a supporter of crooked HELLary.
Do you think there will be an investigation?
  #9  
Old 07-31-2016, 03:22 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Do you think there will be an investigation?
Investigation or not, they will NOT indict Hillary during an election. No one wants to be charged with interfering with an election, which would be a felony. They may throw someone to the dogs, such as Debbie, but NOT Hillary.

If Hillary ever faces any charges, it will have to be AFTER the election. If she is elected, it will be an impeachment, but only if the Republicans hold on to their majority. Otherwise, she will go free, knowing that the corrupt system has supported the CLintons once again.
  #10  
Old 07-31-2016, 09:00 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Investigation or not, they will NOT indict Hillary during an election. No one wants to be charged with interfering with an election, which would be a felony. They may throw someone to the dogs, such as Debbie, but NOT Hillary.

If Hillary ever faces any charges, it will have to be AFTER the election. If she is elected, it will be an impeachment, but only if the Republicans hold on to their majority. Otherwise, she will go free, knowing that the corrupt system has supported the CLintons once again.
How will anything get done?
  #11  
Old 07-31-2016, 09:56 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Who are these hypocrites that are all of a sudden espousing the law?

They certainly cannot be the Clinton supporters!

They certainly cannot be the supporters of the party that accept not enforcing the laws of America.

They must be the rag doll puppets with the string in the neck capability to respond.

Out of context fabrication seems to be "good enough" for them as long as it supports their position.

How totally sad to have to wait for either the media or the party talking points issue to know what to say.....about anything.
  #12  
Old 07-31-2016, 10:09 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Who are these hypocrites that are all of a sudden espousing the law?
Who are you talking about? Liberals that are against the law and are now in favor of the law? Is that it?
  #13  
Old 07-31-2016, 11:14 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
A fitting penalty would be castration; however, there is nothing down there to cut off.
How low can you stoop to ? So low class and unworthy of any discussion . Do you think your candidate Ms. Clinton would approve of your Post ?

Of course she would ! Because she is a gutter fighter just like you .

You and Hillary two pigs in a blanket !
  #14  
Old 07-31-2016, 11:14 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hey, are you folks criticizing Hillary?
Stop that! Mr O made it clear on her accomplishments: His words: She has visited more countries than any other government person has ever done! Note here by definition that TRAVEL is an accomplishment!

Just get your private luxury jet, fill it with fuel and take your gov credit card. Take your kid and all your friends and supporters, then travel the world, eat the great banquets, drink the fancy drinks, stay in the Villas in the thousand bucks per nite units while you cut deals to enhance your pedophile husband and live it up. Sock it to the taxpayer.
By O's definition, you are a winner worthy of the WH again.
  #15  
Old 07-31-2016, 11:41 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

HELLary's proof of her accomplishments is measured by her frequent flyer awards accumulated. I bet she has figured out how to get double the miles.
 

Tags
start, felony, committed, dnc, hillary


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:44 AM.