Talk of The Villages Florida
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, Political talk (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/)
-   -   Hillary squeaky clean (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/hillary-squeaky-clean-160949/)

Guest 09-02-2015 05:32 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 1107666)
I prefer to be called a Social Progressive.

You can refer to yourself as a Regressive. Instead of going forward, you just retreat into the past. You know - to the time of slavery, women barefoot and pregnant, and only white men allowed to vote. :ohdear:
If that was true, that would make him a Democrat, since they are the party against abolishing slavery. But, go ahead and prove your ignorance by attacking those that spotlight your weakness.

Guest 09-02-2015 05:37 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 1107651)
Well, aren't you special? :ohdear:
Yes, he is. Because thanks to those that served :super:, you get to sit back on your fat behind and criticize. You're welcome.

Guest 09-02-2015 05:39 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 1107663)
Well, aren't you just another ill-educated liberal jerk.:1rotfl:
So true....:thumbup:

Guest 09-02-2015 05:46 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 1107666)
I prefer to be called a Social Progressive.

You can refer to yourself as a Regressive. Instead of going forward, you just retreat into the past. You know - to the time of slavery, women barefoot and pregnant, and only white men allowed to vote. :ohdear:
A "social progressive"?? Ha! Another Socialist, is the more correct term. A term synonymous with being lazy, and dependent on the government. One that is never satisfied with what is given to them by the government and will ultimately bite the hand that feeds them. That's a "social progressive." One step away from anarchy. One that believes in abolishing all social laws, as long as it enhances their lifestyle, regardless of morals and ethics. A short step from communism, where the government IS the deity and church is banned. Did I get that about right?

Guest 09-02-2015 08:17 AM
No problem Sandtrap328. I'll refer to you as a Social Progressive in the future.

By the way, your screen name appears on my computer whenever you post. Just thought that you'd like to know.:D

Guest 09-02-2015 08:24 AM
I have a problem every time this thread pops up.

The words Clinton and squeaky clean in the same sentence just makes one stop in their tracks.

Guest 09-02-2015 09:07 AM
Which were happier times, 1992-2000 or 2000-2008?

Guest 09-02-2015 09:25 AM
so much for the mission statement!

Chastise them, hoping to embarrass them. You did neither. All you did was stop all conversation on this thread. I addressed the thread with a serious post. There wasn't one response, because the two of you acted both like little children.

This board is a total waste of time. Unless the moderators come in and delete the nonsense, nothing will change. Self policing will not work as long as you have one person that thinks he can out do the other in childish behavior.

Guest 09-02-2015 10:26 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 1107824)
so much for the mission statement!

Chastise them, hoping to embarrass them. You did neither. All you did was stop all conversation on this thread. I addressed the thread with a serious post. There wasn't one response, because the two of you acted both like little children.

This board is a total waste of time. Unless the moderators come in and delete the nonsense, nothing will change. Self policing will not work as long as you have one person that thinks he can out do the other in childish behavior.
What mission statement? And stop calling for the Moderators like some kid asking for their mommy. This is a political forum, not Sunday school.

Guest 09-02-2015 11:48 AM
That is right you didn't post on the Mission statement thread. That post was an attempt to self clean this board from the likes of you.

Guest 09-02-2015 04:31 PM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 1107395)
While I served in the Navy I sent and received literally hundreds, if not thousands, of classified messages (that was before the days of email). Every classified message that I sent was marked with the appropriate classification by ME and no one else. It was MY responsibility to make sure that any message that I drafted and/or sent was properly annotated. If the information was later deemed to classified and I had not marked it as such, It would have been viewed as as serious breach of security and not taken lightly. Claiming to be ignorant was not a valid defense them, and it is not now.

I'm quite sure that many of the messages the Hilary drafted and sent contained sensitive information, so why weren't the marked as such? The only reason that I can think of is that she is an IDIOT!
You forget that the rules don't apply to Hilary ... only to the little people whom she dearly loves


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:50 PM.
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.