Hillary believes that women are intelligent enough to decide what to do with their own bodies.

Hillary believes that women are intelligent enough to decide if they should be on birth control and what kind.

Hillary supports the Affordable Care Act.

Hillary supports all people being able to marry the people they love, regardless of gender, color, religion.

Hillary believes, as does the president, that Iraq should be fighting their own battles and not relying on the US.

Under our constitutional democracy, we have one president at a time. It is unlikely, in my opinion, that there will be a lot of daylight between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, at least for the forseeable future.

Hillary will be giving a policy speech in South Carolina soon. (Yes you read that correct, South Carolina) It seems that Hillary is going to try to win all 50 states, run the tables, shoot the moon.

Listen to her upcoming speech for the answers to your questions. There is still plenty of time to decide who deserves your vote.

No, we don't know THERE ARE BETTER DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES. It appears to be your opinion that there are - but that is YOUR OPINION ONLY. I seriously doubt a democratic primary voter gives a hill of beans what you believe.

If there are better candidates, let them declare their candidacy and let them put together a campaign and run - like Sanders.

The democratic primaries will decide who the Democrats advance as their candidate for President of the Unites States.

What a Republican believes is irrelevant.

All these nasty attacks on Mrs. Clinton - and she still beats ANY Republican candidate - declared or not.

What does that say about the Republican candidates?

The antagonizer(s) were away for the weekend and are obviously back.

In other words, you really have nothing to contribute.

I guess we are even then.

This will amaze you, but I want to give you credit and it is due.

Normally, your posts totally ignore the mention of any issues, and will give you credit that when challenged you came back with a response that mentioned a few.

I am not sure you are correct in what you say but I am sure you will change as she changes !!

What i find curious, and will ask about this. You use her first name, Hillary, as if you know her. Was this not condemned when the President did it with Sen Warren ? Would you ever; well, never saw you or anyone refer to our President as anything but President or Obama.....never saw him referred to as Barack.

I am just curious as it is not a normal circumstance, using the first name like that. Oh, I have seen it down when you or a crony want to make fun of someone on the other side, but using as you did is curious to me !!

Nothing wrong with using Hillary. If you feel you want to call the President by his first name, do it. We all said JFK, Ike, or Tricky Dick. Whatever floats your boat and makes you happy.

Ok...not my cup of tea to refer to people like some, not all, that you mention.

But I suppose I misunderstood that the National Association of Women and others were a bit upset with the Presidents use of a first name in referring to Sen Warren.

My "boat is mostly floated" by NOT referring to elected officials or those running for office by other than their title or using Mr or Mrs. But that's just me.

Instead of changing the subject to how people are addressed, how about telling us exactly where republicans stand on these mostly women's issues so we can debate them? After all this election is all about issues, and we can address people by their proper title after they've been elected.

You are making a ton of assumptions.

First, I have no idea of who might be the candidate. Two, begin a thread, give YOUR, not anyone else's take on any of these issues and let people offer up their thoughts.

You are enamored with party. It appears that you will support the democratic candidate, no matter up. I am not that party oriented and prefer to listen to candidates.

Fact that you made it about the party seems to indicate that YOUR view will be exactly what they say, no matter if it "evolves" in the next year and a half, See that eliminates you from any discussions.

Give YOUR FEELINGS, not a party line. That is how you learn.

You seem to speak only in "party" and while my view may go more right than yours, I think for myself and like to read or hear all views. I will not be lead by a party EVER.

Adding.....people try to discuss ISSUES...ISIS, jobs or whatever, but folks like you turn it into a party discussion. Try discussing the issue and how YOU feel, and forget what the President, Ms. Clinton, the Speaker of the House, or anyone else says. They should not control your thoughts.

Point is, I have never ever seen a candidate in my long life, nor a political party with which I agreed on 100 percent, or probably even 80 to 85 percent.

To agree with a party this far in advance is a bit odd.

I, just me, need to listen as they debate and discuss...is that not what the process is about ?

If not, just look at party registration and declare who wins.

Ok, let's talk about an issue ...

Assuming there is no medical issue regarding the life of the mother, do you favor or oppose aborting babies in the last trimester?

For example, a baby girl in the womb who is 8.5 months and about 7 lbs, and fully healthy based on sonograms etc ... should the mother be allowed to klll (ie abort) that baby if she decides that, after all, she really doesn't want to be a mother?