mellincf |
10-19-2017 03:38 PM |
Quote:
Posted by Guest
My friend if you aim is to educate people about this nation's political history you might consider discussing the the lives of our founders, how are Articles of Freedom originated, famous men and women i history, famous battles, but birthdays naw
The Trump Derangement Syndrome is appropriately applied because the posters rail against the man no matter what he does but their criticisms are absent any substantive discussion about the actions/policies, etc he has taken. Essentially I am saying they are attacking the person and not policy which should matter to them.
Would you as an attorney spend your time defaming a defendant only. Would the court respond by saying Ok you thin the guy's a louse but you never spoken to whether or not the defendant's actions caused this accident.
Personal Best Regards:
|
I beg to differ. The man IS the actions and policies he has taken. Today, Trump is struggling to get past the bad look of—once again—feuding with a Gold star family, this time having told the widow of Sgt. La David Johnson that “he knew what he signed up for.”
So today's tweet: Uranium deal to Russia, with Clinton help and Obama Administration knowledge, is the biggest story that Fake Media doesn't want to follow!
Fox News was, of course, all over that today. What we’ve known all along is that the big scandalous uranium deal that Trump is desperate to keep talking about was signed off on by nine U.S. agencies and the Canadian government, and that while the State Department was one of the nine U.S. agencies, Clinton wasn’t personally involved in the decision.
Trump is trying to change the subject from his callous disrespect to the family of Sgt. La David Johnson. He’s only too happy to try to change the subject to one of his pet conspiracy theories, one that he’s repeatedly used to try to minimize evidence of his campaign’s collusion with Russian election meddling by linking Clinton and Russia. It’s been a desperate move all along, but his base will eat it up. Again. Remember: this story has been debunked repeatedly.
So in this case, am I attacking the man or his actions?
|