Talk of The Villages Florida
Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, Political talk (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/)
-   -   I'm a racist (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/im-racist-229891/)

Don Baldwin 02-11-2017 09:48 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest
Local news for the bleeding hearts...
They are VIOLENT...

ColdNoMore 02-11-2017 12:11 PM
Quote:
Posted by Guest
Sorry BobnBev....this screenshot identifies you forever.

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...b320da488a.jpg
:thumbup:

rubicon 02-11-2017 01:19 PM
Quote:
Posted by Guest
Agreed...MLK Blvd is the most dangerous street in the town/city...why? Because it's where THEY live. The species that lives among us that is FAR from being like us.



WHAT was said that was incorrect? Is not MLK Blvd ALWAYS the most dangerous street in town?

It's CERTAINLY much different than the "whitest" street in town...is it not?

Why? Why IS MLK Blvd ALWAYS nasty and violent?

Because THEY live there...that's the ONLY reason. REMOVE the blacks from MLK Blvd and the violence goes away with them.

They're NOT us.



WHAT was INCORRECT what he said? Nothing. You're just labeling him for speaking the truth because you don't like the truth...you can't accept the truth.



They ARE judged by their BEHAVIORS. Go to MLK Blvd and SEE how they "behave". Until you do...how can you comment? And if you have been to MLK Blvd and seen how they behave...why are you protecting them? They behave like the animals they are.

Fair minded IS placing blame where it BELONGS. It's ALWAYS them destroying something good when they show up. When do they EVER improve a place? Never...

I got my opinions from THEM. Watching what they DO. Seeing their "character". Skin color is 1% the rest is inside. They are NOT us.
Dear Guest:

Your own printed words make my case.

YOU POSIT "skin color is 1% the rest is inside.

You would be in a stronger debating position if you spoke to behavior and not race.

if you are not trolling with your diatribes ,then you are being consumed by hate and that is not good for your well being.

If you are trolling for laughs, the laugh is on you because your presenting yourself in poor light.

Since I do not have a dog in this fight it doesn't matter either way

Personal Best Regards:

Sandtrap328 02-11-2017 02:06 PM
Quote:
Posted by Guest
Don't ya just love the inuendo that some have an insight that others may not have like seeing your TOTV screen name.

Do you really believe someone behaves differently with the second layer of anonymity labeled as "guest".
The use of guest is a false method of security of some kind in the eyes of those that run the system. So be it.

Yes I believe there are some who get big and brave and mouthy on any internet activity where they know or think they know nobody else knows who they really are.

For the rest of us what you see is what you get...in private...on the internet ....or sitting across the table.

The he11 raisers and antagonists are not in that group.
So says the man that goes to the same church as I do. Right, btm?

ColdNoMore 02-11-2017 02:58 PM
Quote:
Posted by Guest
So says the man that goes to the same church as I do. Right, btm?
Well Sandy, it's pretty obvious who actually tries to be a good Christian....between you and Billeth. :ho:

And it isn't him. ;)

Keep up the good work. :thumbup:

Don Baldwin 02-11-2017 08:57 PM
Quote:
Posted by Guest
Dear Guest:

Your own printed words make my case.

YOU POSIT "skin color is 1% the rest is inside.

You would be in a stronger debating position if you spoke to behavior and not race.

if you are not trolling with your diatribes ,then you are being consumed by hate and that is not good for your well being.

If you are trolling for laughs, the laugh is on you because your presenting yourself in poor light.

Since I do not have a dog in this fight it doesn't matter either way

Personal Best Regards:
Are you kidding me? That's ALL I DO...SHOW you that they're violent, that they destroy schools, neighborhoods, towns, cities, whole countries...JUST with their presence. BECAUSE of their behavior. BECAUSE of their violence.

You should read the words I used...not the words you THINK I used. I'm ALWAYS saying it's their character...NOT the color of their skin. It's TRUE that there are over 100 differences between a negro and a white. There are probably 100 SKELETAL differences alone. Any osteopaths here who could answer?

If you have kids...grandkids...you DO have a dog in this fight.

dave harris 02-12-2017 10:05 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest
In other words, ANY reaction by a white person is wrong. Argumentation? The real problem with white society/culture, is that black culture (as a whole) realizes they can't compete on the great grounds of civilization against white people. They are a jealous, bitter, envious race/culture that is constantly using violence to try and get what they want and cannot achieve with brains and patience. White people do not wake up in the morning and wonder "Hmmm, just what can I do to screw up black people today?" It's more of "How can I avoid areas where these dangerous bitter fools will be today?"
Do you consider yourself a Christian?

Don Baldwin 02-12-2017 10:59 AM
"Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
In other words, ANY reaction by a white person is wrong. Argumentation? The real problem with white society/culture, is that black culture (as a whole) realizes they can't compete on the great grounds of civilization against white people. They are a jealous, bitter, envious race/culture that is constantly using violence to try and get what they want and cannot achieve with brains and patience. White people do not wake up in the morning and wonder "Hmmm, just what can I do to screw up black people today?" It's more of "How can I avoid areas where these dangerous bitter fools will be today?""


Quote:
Posted by Guest
Do you consider yourself a Christian?
What does that have to do with the truth? HE isn't making them act the way they do. HE isn't goading them on...encouraging their bad behavior.

Do you have a problem with WHAT he said? Anything untrue?

I think it's YOU who have a problem...it's called delusion...failure to see the truth in something obvious.

The OT seemed to be fine with slavery...and Jesus never mentions black people.

larbud 02-12-2017 11:18 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest
Do you consider yourself a Christian?
Actually I consider Myself a Fisherman!! Ain't no ucfing hypocrites on the water,,, church on the other hand,,,,SMH

MDLNB 02-12-2017 05:29 PM
Quote:
Posted by Guest
Do you consider yourself a Christian?
I would ask you if you considered yourself a Christian, but you already stated that you are not. But, you certainly want to hold conservatives to Christian standards. Do you hold all orientals to Buddhist standards? By the way, do you realize that you have asked a Jew if they considered himself a Christian, in the past? I bet he was laughing his *** off.

RickeyD 02-12-2017 11:46 PM
"Racism rests on two basic assumptions: that a correlation exists between physical characteristics and moral qualities; that mankind is divisible into superior and inferior stocks. Racism, thus defined, is a modern conception, for prior to the XVIth century there was virtually nothing in the life and thought of the West that can be described as racist. To prevent misunderstanding a clear distinction must be made between racism and ethnocentrism ... The Ancient Hebrews, in referring to all who were not Hebrews as Gentiles, were indulging in ethnocentrism, not in racism. ... So it was with the Hellenes who denominated all non-Hellenes—whether the wild Scythians or the Egyptians whom they acknowledged as their mentors in the arts of civilization—Barbarians, the term denoting that which was strange or foreign."

rubicon 02-13-2017 04:41 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest
"Racism rests on two basic assumptions: that a correlation exists between physical characteristics and moral qualities; that mankind is divisible into superior and inferior stocks. Racism, thus defined, is a modern conception, for prior to the XVIth century there was virtually nothing in the life and thought of the West that can be described as racist. To prevent misunderstanding a clear distinction must be made between racism and ethnocentrism ... The Ancient Hebrews, in referring to all who were not Hebrews as Gentiles, were indulging in ethnocentrism, not in racism. ... So it was with the Hellenes who denominated all non-Hellenes—whether the wild Scythians or the Egyptians whom they acknowledged as their mentors in the arts of civilization—Barbarians, the term denoting that which was strange or foreign."
Perhaps you are correct? However another possibility is that racism has always existed it's just that it was labeled something else such as tribalism? Indeed some it may have been for defense of their village but the notion that you are different then me and hence I do not trust you sets the framework for racism

How does one define the great wars between the christian world and the world of Islam dating back to the 7th century?. Nations have had slaves since the beginning of time.

Historians claim that when Rome was just a village Romans would welcome all strangers to their camps. Thus Rome grew great because of their practice of inclusion.

Personal Best Regards:

rubicon 02-13-2017 04:43 AM
Now a question for the group. Are segregationist racist?

Personal Best Regards:

dirtbanker 02-13-2017 08:53 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 1359337)
Do you consider yourself a Christian?
You keep throwing this out and I am curious if you got anything beyond your silly question, so I will respond to see the rest of your cards...

No I am not a Christian, I do not believe in God. How about you?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-T337A using Tapatalk

Sandtrap328 02-13-2017 09:25 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest
Now a question for the group. Are segregationist racist?

Personal Best Regards:
Look at the Supreme Court decision of Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) and you see the phrase of "separate but equal" in determining that separate facilities were fine and not discriminating.

However, that was overturned in 1954 with Brown v. Board of Education that separate facilities did in fact discriminate against a group of people.

So, the answer to your question is YES. What do you say and back up your reply with fact please.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:57 AM.
Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.