[QUOTE=Guest;1127683]
Obama sicked the IRS on the Tea Party. Tell me he didn't know it was going on and I will tell you that you have a leader that doesn't know what his troops are doing. Therefore a failed leadership.QUOTE]

A small veering off the path here - but quite important.

Florida Goobernator Rick Scott used to be CEO of the huge hospital consortium.

They got fined about 2 Billion dollars for scamming Medicare. Scott said even though he was CEO, he knew nothing of the scam.

In your own words, a leader that doesn't know what his troops are doing is a failed leadership - yet Scott was able to stay out of jail and become Goobernator of Florida.

Same Sex Marriage became law of the land at the moment the decision was rendered by the Supreme Court.

Davis had no choice but to comply with it as her sworn duty as a public official.

[QUOTE=Guest;1127713]because he is a lot richer and significantly smarter!

[QUOTE=Guest;1127713]Dear Guest: I am not in the habit of defending politicians but for the sake of fairness let me point out that Scott's corporation merged with another firm and it was the latter firm accused of medicare fraud billing. so it is plausible that Scott did not have information concerning the past practices of this firm?

Personal Best Regards:

The court made an interpretation of the constitution. Not the "law of the land." Even if allowed, that does not require a court house to issue a marriage license. It just says that deviants have the right to get married. It does not require the church to perform the marriage. It only says they have the right to get married. I don't believe there is a law that states that if Davis does not issue a license, she will go to jail. I don't believe there is a statutory law that says that if she does not perform her job then she will go to jail. If you could go to jail for not performing you job, then Obama should have been thrown in jail a long time ago, for not enforcing immigration law.

Since Davis was elected(?) to her position, they probably have to use a different means to relieve her of her employment, other than outright firing her. If her employer deemed that she was wrong, then that is between them, not the court.

She should not have opened her mouth and she wouldn't be in this trouble. She could have rightly stated that she had no instruction on how to handle the documentation for a gay marriage. She could have told them to come back after proper instruction was provided to her. She handled it wrong and she will likely lose her job. But to put her in jail without a direct court order with her name on it, is illegal. Just because gays wish to punish anyone that doesn't agree with them, is not going to convince acceptance. It will likely do the opposite. Those that tolerated their deviant behavior in the past will likely become less tolerant the more they are forced to accept it as a normal behavior.

And right now there are 3 far left liberals and one maybe two rhino's on the surpreme courts.
IMO the two laws that need upmost attending are TERM LIMITS, for senate, house, and surpreme courts justices. That right there would solve 95% of most problems. The outer would be outlawing Lobbists. Then we might have chance at citzens representation.

Read the Constitution of the United States! It would have to be amended before your ideas of term limits could be implemented.

So, what's the problem with that? Isn't that their job?

Have you ever looked at how the profess goes for the Constitution to be amended?

All it takes is an Executive Order, right? I mean, Obama writes his own law whenever he feels like it, so the next president can too.

Seriously though, do your really think that anyone in America is going to stand in the way of a constitutional amendment on term limits?

Here is a chart of Executive Orders by President. Common practice in the past and will be so in the future


Executive Orders

Seriously, do you honestly think that Congressmen would bring up the motion to amend the Constitution that would limit their time in Congress?

:a20:

It's possible. That may be something that the Freedom Coalition would do, or the Tea Party. There are some out there that are working toward a more accountable government.

Of course, the liberals are working toward a more gov dominating society, where the gov nanny controls everyone, giving the gov more control over their lives.