Guest |
05-08-2016 04:36 AM |
Quote:
Posted by Guest
(Post 1222851)
This is one time that I will have to disagree with you. My experience with Indian doctors has been positive and lifesaving. India is nasty and dirty, but my experience with their doctors has been quite the contradiction. One saved my wife's life, one did an excellent job on operating on my arm and I currently frequent one as my personal physician. But, maybe I am an exception regarding a record of decent treatment. And by the way, Indians are mostly Hindu. Most of the Muslim Indians were split off to Pakistan by the Brits. And yes, I have lived in India, and I have been to Bangladesh, Kuwait and Iraq. And have also lived in Turkey.
As far as Muslims go, I am concerned about the influx of Muslims in the world and the possible result of Sharia law and radical Islam taking control of Christian based countries. Even though I have had good relations with Muslim friends, that does not mean that I trust a Muslim majority in power. They are very/very harsh. Even in a Westernized Turkey, I have witnessed Christian missionaries arrested for their faith. I have seen women struck by police officers and told not to speak to them. I have seem people arrested for cursing at someone (they can fight but not curse). Liberals would not last a week in a Muslim controlled system. Conservatives would not TOLERATE a Muslim influenced America and fight it. Liberals embrace anything different, as long as it looks like someone else will make decisions for them. But, they would not last long with Sharia law. Especially, gays.
|
Thank you. very balanced and realistic outlook.
Xenophobia is one of those politically correct words whose sole purpose is to end conversation.
I respect most religions (exceptions satanism wiccuns). However, I object to behaviors based on a manipulation of one religious beliefs whether its one of those that flow from Abraham Christian, Jew or Muslim, any other or none at all.
I am surprised that people are surprised as to the division between the Muslim world and the west. Its been ongoing for centuries.
When a person decides that s/he want to immigrate to another country s/he should understand and desire to learn their customs and language. It doesn't mean that you forget your heritage. The Europeans who immigrated early on kept their traditions, but immersed themselves into American culture.
The issue of "naturalized citizen" has come up in the last three election cycles for the purposes of qualifying as a presidential candidate. In my world such a candidate should be born in this country, as well as both his/her parents. I say this because such a candidate would better understand the culture, thinking, history of the people he/she will serve.
If this Muslim man elected to be mayor of London has such a background or similar then perhaps it could be a benefit in bridging the wide divide between Muslim and the Brits. Conversely if this mayor has not made that philosophical leap and holds tight to Muslim culture it could be devastating. Which leads me to ask who exactly supported this candidate and why? Time will give us the answers
America is generally speaking center or center right in its politics. America is not doing well under the stewardship of an ultra left international oriented president.
It certain both Democratic presidential candidates will carry on with this same agenda. And unless the presumptive Republic candidate, who is a naturalized citizen makes a sharp right turn America will not fare well with him either. He is too great a narcissist to work with the separation of powers the founders understood was needed.
Personal Best Regards:
|