Looks like time for Joe to get off the bench as Clinton tanks (again)

 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 02-07-2016, 11:57 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
I could make up any story just like you can. You offer no facts except that you say so.

Why should anyone on this forum believe a blowhard like you? Oooo, you claim to know somebody whose grocer's third cousin's former hairdresser was there!

Bust yoursel in the chops.
The only offense known to folks in your category.
This would be a good spot to use a bite me emoticon!
  #17  
Old 02-07-2016, 12:06 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Once again, you offer just your story. Why should you be believed? Obviously, you have a hatred for the Clintons and therefore your stories could be all fabrications.

As for the Chelsea story, give us a link to that article so we can see if that was true or another fabrication.
Sorry, but I am a different "Guest" than the one you were disparaging originally. I injected my reply to you because it seems like you are the ONLY person I know of that seems in denial when it comes to this issue regarding the Cinton's dislike and treatment of our military. Actually, it appears that you are just plain in denial, period.
  #18  
Old 02-07-2016, 12:08 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Once again, you offer just your story. Why should you be believed? Obviously, you have a hatred for the Clintons and therefore your stories could be all fabrications.

As for the Chelsea story, give us a link to that article so we can see if that was true or another fabrication.
OOooo, someone "hates" the Clintons. Those poor, literally poor peasants that left the White House so broke that they had to steal thousands of dollars worth of valuables. I wonder if they applied for food stamps.
  #19  
Old 02-07-2016, 12:18 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
and there goes the electio:

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/democratic...010248619.html

Finally the recognition of trying to force a severly damaged candidate on their party has gone far enough.

Too bad it took so long. Time to get Clinton on her broom and out of the way!
(not being nasty...the marines used to secrely call the helicopter that took her as first lady around..."broomstick one"!)
https://www.truthorfiction.com/troop...omstick-one-2/
  #20  
Old 02-07-2016, 12:36 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Chi, it's all well and good that one sentence out of a complete comment is dissected and checked for fault. But, that sentence really didn't have much to do with the link or the theme of the comment.

Liberals wonder why the right scoff at them when the take a whole article or comment and find fault with a spelling error or punctuation. Extremes to divert the subject is what it amounts to.

It is well known that the Clintons do not have an love for the military. Why? Could it be because Billy boy was a draft dodger? Who knows?
  #21  
Old 02-07-2016, 12:42 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Chi, it's all well and good that one sentence out of a complete comment is dissected and checked for fault. But, that sentence really didn't have much to do with the link or the theme of the comment.

Liberals wonder why the right scoff at them when the take a whole article or comment and find fault with a spelling error or punctuation. Extremes to divert the subject is what it amounts to.

It is well known that the Clintons do not have an love for the military. Why? Could it be because Billy boy was a draft dodger? Who knows?
Not a political statement as much as epsilons parroting stupidity.
  #22  
Old 02-07-2016, 12:56 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
It is SO hilarious how the Republicans and Tea Bags are terrified that Mrs. Clinton WILL win the Presidency in November that they try tossing names "that need to be ready to step in".

Not many months ago, the name to watch was O'Malley. Everyone knew that was an impossibility. Next was Biden. He thought about it and said no. Sanders does have that same quality as Eugene McCarthy had with young voters but the DNC will not make that huge mistake again.

So, my Tea Bag friends, the nominee WILL be Mrs. Clinton vs your bumbling nominee of Marco Rubio. Wow, that guy got whomped in the debate last night by Christie and Trump, didn't he? When he stepped outside the canned comments and had to answer by himself, he was like Mel Tillis!
Yes, he's very shallow, no substance. But it's either him or one of the loonies like Trump or Cruz. For the life of me, I can't believe that is the best they could come up with. Well it certainly makes Hillary's job easier.
  #23  
Old 02-07-2016, 01:18 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Chi, it's all well and good that one sentence out of a complete comment is dissected and checked for fault. But, that sentence really didn't have much to do with the link or the theme of the comment.

Liberals wonder why the right scoff at them when the take a whole article or comment and find fault with a spelling error or punctuation. Extremes to divert the subject is what it amounts to.

It is well known that the Clintons do not have an love for the military. Why? Could it be because Billy boy was a draft dodger? Who knows?
Which of the current Republican candidates served in the military? Hmmm? Even though there was no draft when they were eligible does not give them any creds for not enlisting, does it?

Wasn't Cheney a draft dodger as well?
  #24  
Old 02-07-2016, 01:41 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Draft dodgers....how antiquated that term has become except for some that live in some kind of time warp. Surprised they don't refer to it as conscription dodging. It's been over 40 years. Move on.
  #25  
Old 02-07-2016, 02:08 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Your childish slurs are noted so you can go now.

No one is afraid of Hillary. They only fear her socialist ideology and deceit. No one can trust her, for all her lying. She is a criminal and we have seen enough Chicago politics to last us a lifetime. It is obvious that idiots approve of her because they are NOT thinking of the country, but only of themselves. Liberals embrace socialism because they are lazy and hate patriotism or even the idea of it. They are cowards that hide in their hate for anyone with courage enough to put country first.

Regarding Rubio's response to the fat school yard bully, I thought he handled it pretty well, considering. Christie attacked him, and it took him a couple minutes to pick himself back up. He had the best answers regarding foreign policy and national defense of all of them. And that is way more important than Christie's failed governorship of NJ. Christie thinks that being a lawyer in itself is qualifying for president. Rubio, even though appearing younger than the rest, is only one year younger than Cruz and has about 14 more years experience. Christie realizes that he has no chance at all, but is too stupid to accept it. When Rubio brought up some valid points, Christie just retorted with personal jabs and absolutely no defense for Rubio's points.

It is not a matter of "beating" Hillary. She is her own worst enemy. She thinks that her followers are stupid enough to believe her lies and deception. She may be right, come to think of it.

The DNC is soooo desperate right now, that they are still trying to FORCE Biden to run for president. They know that the DNC candidates are way too light weight to and radical to represent their party. No one but Debbie Whatshername can even stand Hillary and Sanders is a socialist and not in lockstep with the DNC. He is also mentally unstable and they are afraid they won't be able to control him. This is too much for him anyway and he will probably croak before the final nominations. The Clinton's are pretty lucky about having people croak around them when they pose a threat. So many coincidences.

No, the DNC is very desperate right now. They are way outnumbered, with superior forces. Everyone can see how their taxes will have to go up to fund any of the great Democrat/socialist give a ways.
Where do you get the idea that Bernie Saunders is mentally unstable?? Bernie Sanders Calls for Revolution in Mental Health Delivery
  #26  
Old 02-07-2016, 02:41 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Which of the current Republican candidates served in the military? Hmmm? Even though there was no draft when they were eligible does not give them any creds for not enlisting, does it?

Wasn't Cheney a draft dodger as well?
Wow, maybe I ought to type slower so you can get it. Try to catch it next time it goes over your head. It has nothing to do with anyone serving in the military. It was some stupid liberal's attempt to divert by picking one line of a statement that one of the posters submitted that was about Clinton in relationship to a comment made by a military member. Wow! How do you get military service of the candidates from that?

Kind of like saying it snowed the night of the primary and you replying that it snows on Christmas in Alaska or something as stupid. Think much?
  #27  
Old 02-07-2016, 02:43 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Where do you get the idea that Bernie Saunders is mentally unstable?? Bernie Sanders Calls for Revolution in Mental Health Delivery
Is that the totality of what you got from the post? Hilarious!
  #28  
Old 02-07-2016, 02:45 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Draft dodgers....how antiquated that term has become except for some that live in some kind of time warp. Surprised they don't refer to it as conscription dodging. It's been over 40 years. Move on.
I don't know how old you are, but that is the term used during the Vietnam War for those that left the country to avoid the draft. If you don't want to discuss the issue then don't divert from the subject next time. Liberals really have a problem with a direct conversation that is not going well for them.
  #29  
Old 02-07-2016, 02:51 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Yes, he's very shallow, no substance. But it's either him or one of the loonies like Trump or Cruz. For the life of me, I can't believe that is the best they could come up with. Well it certainly makes Hillary's job easier.
Any way you look at it, none of the GOP candidates are responsible for the deaths of fellow patriotic Americans, are thieves, tax evaders, mishandled classified information(felony) or are Anti-American socialists/communists. So, any of the GOP candidates are a better choice than the pitiful showing of the so-called Democrat party. The Democrat party has become a joke. And I remember when Obama was elected and every liberal came out of the closet and pronounced the Republican party DOA. Let's see who gets the latest laugh when the shoe is on the other foot.
  #30  
Old 02-07-2016, 03:07 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Where do you get the idea that Bernie Saunders is mentally unstable?? Bernie Sanders Calls for Revolution in Mental Health Delivery
One indicator could be the fact that every answer he has in his debates is that campaign funding needs to be reformed. No matter what question he is asked, that is his answer. He is also mentally unstable when he thinks that our country should be like the failed system of the USSR where he had his honeymoon. Doing his honeymoon in the old USSR is enough to convince anyone that the guy is not right in the head. But, don't worry about Sanders. This all revolves around the Clintons. The corrupt element of politics.
 

Tags
call, joe, bench, clinton, tanks, time

Thread Tools

You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:05 PM.