Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, Political talk (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/)
-   -   More about Clinton...confirming what we know (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/more-about-clinton-confirming-what-we-know-158646/)

Guest 07-30-2015 05:44 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1093067)
Dear Guests,
Suppose, just suppose, that by some fluke that Sec. Clinton DOES win the Presidency against ______. Are all of you going to spend the next 8 years grousing over every piece of soundbite you can find?

Get out to your candidate of choice at this time and start working for him/her. Contribute money in large amounts to their campaigns. Let the candidate lead a good life with your money while they are still a candidate. Stir up the community with signs of support on your car and cart. Of course, be prepared for them to be taken off by opposing candidate supporters.

Stop just talking about how terrible the Democrats are but actually do something positive so when the Republican nominee is named, you might have had something to do with it. At that point, donate more money and time to the Republican PACs and start working volunteer time for that candidate. Get fired up!

Then, in November, get together with your fellow campaign workers, watch the returns on television, and hopefully see Karl Rove melt down like he did in 2012 when Ohio was called for Obama. That was PRICELESS.

Or you can just sit back, do nothing except gripe on TOV. The result will be the same, no matter what you do.

HILLARY CLINTON WINS THE PRESIDENCY IN 2016.

Personal Best Regards:

The Democrat party is defunct. They went their way with the passing of our parents. It has morphed into the Euro-American Socialist party. Be smug if you wish, but it is tomorrow's generation that will have to live with the consequences of today's supposed progressives. :sad:

Guest 07-30-2015 05:56 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1093156)
There is no federal law that stopped her from using a personal server.

Did she destroy emails that belonged to the state department? She might have, but how are you going to prove it?

Turn the mails to the fifth Benghazi investigation. You know the current one that the Chairman Trey Gowdy called a prosecution. That one. The one that is going to last until November, 2016. Given all the leaks out of these hearing, can you blame any candidate for not handing private emails over to the opposing party in the current world of politics.

Should she have handed the server to an independent party? No! She should sat there with an independent party, and gone over the emails one by one. However, the server should have never left her sight, or the independent party's sight.

Trust is a two way street. Only a fool would trust the Republicans with anything personal or not.

You are wrong. There IS federal law against what she did. I know because I worked for the Dept of State in IT. Make your ridiculously ignorant comments all you wish, but saying it doesn't make it so. Defend the criminal desperately. She has embarrassed your party and you have no one else to run, other than the admitted Socialist, Sanders. And he would NEVER get the Independent vote.

She has NO private emails once she admits that she was using the server for gov work. All her work becomes gov property, including anything private she puts on it. Sorry, but once again you have been proven wrong.

Should her email be turned over to a private party? NO. The IG should have first been involved and then if they deemed it possible of criminal mischief, they should have called in the FBI. Admittedly, the present FBI is controlled by the top criminal in the White House and it would immediately be buried. He doesn't want anyone to suspect his obvious incompetence. :spoken:

Guest 07-30-2015 06:02 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1093156)
There is no federal law that stopped her from using a personal server.

Did she destroy emails that belonged to the state department? She might have, but how are you going to prove it?

Turn the mails to the fifth Benghazi investigation. You know the current one that the Chairman Trey Gowdy called a prosecution. That one. The one that is going to last until November, 2016. Given all the leaks out of these hearing, can you blame any candidate for not handing private emails over to the opposing party in the current world of politics.

Should she have handed the server to an independent party? No! She should sat there with an independent party, and gone over the emails one by one. However, the server should have never left her sight, or the independent party's sight.

Trust is a two way street. Only a fool would trust the Republicans with anything personal or not.

Wrong as usual. The Federal Records Act pertains. In addition, common sense applies ... except when criminal intent or just plain idiocy is involved. She's not an idiot so draw your own conclusions

Guest 07-30-2015 06:02 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1093153)
I am sure when she isn't convicted of anything everyone here will say they were wrong. Of course, that will be the case. Anyone that reads the posts on any one of threads here can see how opened minded the Republicans here are.

People never change their party affiliation. Right Donald Trump! When they do, they always have good things to say about their former friends. Donald Trump is heaping praise on Hillary right now. Anyone that can't see that just isn't looking.

Hillary was the real force in Bill's presidency. She ran things despite all evidence to the contrary. I think this woman has confused Nancy and Ron with Hillary and Bill. The cameras can make someone look good or bad. Ten years or so after Reagan left office, there was a news report to that effect.

A reporter asked Reagan a question, and he was on camera. Reagan head was bobbing up and down. He had no clue how to answer the reporter. Nancy was behind him, and also on camera. Nancy said, "That problem has come to our attention." Reagan repeated that word for word to the reporter. "That problem has come to our attention." Nancy, "we should have a solution to that problem soon." Ron "we should have a solution to that problem soon." Nancy, "when we do, we will contact you." Ron, "when we do, we will contact you."

If Tripp came forward in the late 90's, she might be believable. Now, only closed minded Republicans would believe her nonsense. If you go back in time, you can make any public person look good or bad.

I have said this before, Hillary has been running for president, since at least the nineties. How can any women endure the public humiliation she did, and still stay with her husband? That doesn't mean she was running the show in the 90's. Hardly!

My God could it be, a republican doesn't like Karl Rove! There is hope. By the way, I am not voting for Hillary. It will Sanders, or Kasich in the primary. It will depend on the one needs my vote more.

Obviously confused when this was written. Perhaps someone should instruct this person on the primary process. And do you have any idea the difference between a socialist and a conservative? I suppose you are just joking around, because no one is legitimately that confused.

Guest 07-30-2015 06:04 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1093172)
Wrong as usual. The Federal Records Act pertains. In addition, common sense applies ... except when criminal intent or just plain idiocy is involved. She's not an idiot so draw your own conclusions

:agree:

Guest 07-30-2015 09:30 AM

Hillary needs not adhere to statutory law that the rest us must abide by. She is/was one of the Obama clan, so she receives special passes based on race, gender and sexual preference....which ever one or more pertains. They carry a handful of wild cards that they can use, declaring a free pass based on "bigotry" of anyone questioning their actions. Hillary does not care about becoming a leader of the greatest nation on earth. She wants to be the FIRST(1st) FEMALE in the position.

Guest 07-30-2015 12:00 PM

You worked in federal government in IT. I guess the IT department you worked in was illogical thought, or maybe insane turds.

There was no LAW forbidding her from using her personal computer from government business. Rule is not a law. That rule was made law recently, but not made retroactive. All of her emails sent to government email addresses were kept on the person receiving computer. If the emails she destroyed were classified information sent to non-government people, she broke the law, and will face criminal charges.

All personal emails become government property once she used the server for government business. This has to be the most ludicrous statement ever posted here, and there isn't a close second. OK, Mr. IT answer this. "Why did Trey Gowdy ask Hillary to send her server to an independent third party? If he had very right to view her private emails, why not send the server directly to him? I know, Trey Gowdy, the prosecutor, doesn't know the law. Trey Gowdy is a Obama plant in the Republican party and he loves her so much, and would do nothing to embarrass her.

I know the primary process is. I am an Independent. I can change my party affiliation, when entering the polling booth, and change it back, when I leave. So, can you. When you enter the polling booth change from Republican to Democrat. Vote for the Democrat that has the best chance to beat Hillary, but not the Republican nominee. Then, change back. If the nominees are Hillary, and any other Republican other than Kasich, I will place a write in vote for Donald Duck.

Guest 07-30-2015 01:02 PM

Since you are ignorant of the law, it is useless to argue with you. I find it humorous that every time a liberal is losing a debate, they lose their cool and resort to derogatory comments and name calling. So be it.
Hilary broke the law. There is no denying that. It's just a matter of how it will be handled. Most likely nothing will be done about it. Today's socialist party will not throw one of their own to the dogs unless they displease the emperor.
Florida and eighteen other states have Closed Primary Elections where only members of a political party may vote in their Party's primary. Either you are not old enough to vote yet and don't understand the procedure, or you are a resident voter from another state and trolling the Villages forum. Personally, I don't care. Perhaps you will learn something on here. If Florida has changed their Independent voting procedure, then I am sure that someone will correct me. The only time an Independent can vote is in the general election. And then anyone can vote for the candidate of their choice regardless of party. Personally, other than bragging rights (I guess) I see no purpose in registering as an Independent. Unless of course, you fear the stigma of being labeled a Democrat.

Guest 07-30-2015 01:18 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1093318)
Since you are ignorant of the law, it is useless to argue with you. I find it humorous that every time a liberal is losing a debate, they lose their cool and resort to derogatory comments and name calling. So be it.
Hilary broke the law. There is no denying that. It's just a matter of how it will be handled. Most likely nothing will be done about it. Today's socialist party will not throw one of their own to the dogs unless they displease the emperor.
Florida and eighteen other states have Closed Primary Elections where only members of a political party may vote in their Party's primary. Either you are not old enough to vote yet and don't understand the procedure, or you are a resident voter from another state and trolling the Villages forum. Personally, I don't care. Perhaps you will learn something on here. If Florida has changed their Independent voting procedure, then I am sure that someone will correct me. The only time an Independent can vote is in the general election. And then anyone can vote for the candidate of their choice regardless of party. Personally, other than bragging rights (I guess) I see no purpose in registering as an Independent. Unless of course, you fear the stigma of being labeled a Democrat.

Heck, I have registered as a Republican so I can vote in their primary elections for the most ludicrous nimrod out there. :a20:

Guest 07-30-2015 01:25 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1093325)
Heck, I have registered as a Republican so I can vote in their primary elections for the most ludicrous nimrod out there. :a20:

:1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl:

You are so :censored: funny....only you think.

Guest 07-30-2015 01:39 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1093325)
Heck, I have registered as a Republican so I can vote in their primary elections for the most ludicrous nimrod out there. :a20:

Me too. The only problem is deciding between all the ludicrous nimrods.

Guest 07-30-2015 01:41 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1093325)
Heck, I have registered as a Republican so I can vote in their primary elections for the most ludicrous nimrod out there. :a20:

Congratulation:rolleyes:

Guest 07-30-2015 01:54 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1093298)
You worked in federal government in IT. I guess the IT department you worked in was illogical thought, or maybe insane turds.

There was no LAW forbidding her from using her personal computer from government business. Rule is not a law. That rule was made law recently, but not made retroactive. All of her emails sent to government email addresses were kept on the person receiving computer. If the emails she destroyed were classified information sent to non-government people, she broke the law, and will face criminal charges.

All personal emails become government property once she used the server for government business. This has to be the most ludicrous statement ever posted here, and there isn't a close second. OK, Mr. IT answer this. "Why did Trey Gowdy ask Hillary to send her server to an independent third party? If he had very right to view her private emails, why not send the server directly to him? I know, Trey Gowdy, the prosecutor, doesn't know the law. Trey Gowdy is a Obama plant in the Republican party and he loves her so much, and would do nothing to embarrass her.

I know the primary process is. I am an Independent. I can change my party affiliation, when entering the polling booth, and change it back, when I leave. So, can you. When you enter the polling booth change from Republican to Democrat. Vote for the Democrat that has the best chance to beat Hillary, but not the Republican nominee. Then, change back. If the nominees are Hillary, and any other Republican other than Kasich, I will place a write in vote for Donald Duck.

Register to Vote or Update your Information - Division of Elections - Florida Department of State


All party changes must be completed by the registration deadline, which is 29 days before the primary election. No voter should go to the polls thinking they can change parties on election day at the polling place.

Guest 07-30-2015 02:01 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1093325)
Heck, I have registered as a Republican so I can vote in their primary elections for the most ludicrous nimrod out there. :a20:

A true American who understands the principles upon which the country was founded, and would never think of mocking the system.

Walk proud.

Guest 07-30-2015 02:33 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1093352)
A true American who understands the principles upon which the country was founded, and would never think of mocking the system.

Walk proud.

Good luck with that. Mocking the system is how Obama got elected.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.