Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, Political talk (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/)
-   -   The more one reads about Clinton the more one wonders why some support her? (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/more-one-reads-about-clinton-more-one-wonders-why-some-support-her-160005/)

Guest 08-22-2015 09:15 AM

The problem is that even if Hilary goes to jail (she won't) the Democrats will still vote for her. They don't care if she is a felonious Mata Hari, they want to elect the first female president. But, it HAS to be a Democrat.

Guest 08-22-2015 10:42 AM

Yes, it has to be a democrat. I believe in the democratic partys point of view. Republicans believe in their partys point of view. Primaries are to pick which person can beat the other party. I may not agree with that choice, but republicans do not share my values.

Guest 08-22-2015 11:10 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1103134)
The problem is that even if Hilary goes to jail (she won't) the Democrats will still vote for her. They don't care if she is a felonious Mata Hari, they want to elect the first female president. But, it HAS to be a Democrat.

This from the party that hasn't won the women's vote since 1988. To what do you owe that accomplishment? Please tell us so we don't make the same mistakes.

Guest 08-22-2015 11:43 AM

I am not sure what it says about the women and democrats who would have an unethical, untrustworthy, unqualified candidate JUST BECAUSE IT HAPPENS TO BE A WOMAN!!!!!!

Guest 08-22-2015 12:01 PM

Trump is definitely the best option in the clown race.

Guest 08-22-2015 12:49 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1103176)
This from the party that hasn't won the women's vote since 1988. To what do you owe that accomplishment? Please tell us so we don't make the same mistakes.

It appears that you are simply spewing from some left wing site.

Yes, you are correct IN GENERAL. HOWEVER, women tend to vote Democratic more because women in general like big government. It has nothing to do with women's issues, per se.

Also, while the Democratic women under 30 in the 2014 elections voted overwhelmingly Democratic 61-37 %, it was the slimmest margin since 1992.

They will NOT vote for Ms Clinton because she is a woman. And I think it would be insulting to all women to make that statement.

Guest 08-22-2015 12:55 PM

Biden has some real challenges ahead. First if he runs against Hillary he will be forced to explain if he believe Hillary can be trusted to run this country and certainly on her decision/judgment to operate a personal email server. If he waits it may be too late to gain traction. He, like Hillary will always be a part of the Obama decision making machine which hasn't worked out well at all

As to Hillary followers yes the would follow her to hell. Given the information the public has been given on her actions relating to the private email server there is sufficient documentation that she has committed criminal acts. But the progressive response is "yea she may be a crook but she's our crook."

As to the presidential campaign overall I am concerned that people are treating it as if they were viewing reality television and all this is for their amusement.

I don't like Trump and I don't like the way he campaigns but he has tapped into a gold mine because he is saying what is on voter's minds. It is over shadowing many candidates and that is not a good thing. The RNC has to handle Trump with kid gloves because he could go renegade (3rd party)

I am looking forward to the next debate.

Personal Best Regards:

Guest 08-22-2015 01:23 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1103204)
Biden has some real challenges ahead. First if he runs against Hillary he will be forced to explain if he believe Hillary can be trusted to run this country and certainly on her decision/judgment to operate a personal email server. If he waits it may be too late to gain traction. He, like Hillary will always be a part of the Obama decision making machine which hasn't worked out well at all

As to Hillary followers yes the would follow her to hell. Given the information the public has been given on her actions relating to the private email server there is sufficient documentation that she has committed criminal acts. But the progressive response is "yea she may be a crook but she's our crook."

As to the presidential campaign overall I am concerned that people are treating it as if they were viewing reality television and all this is for their amusement.

I don't like Trump and I don't like the way he campaigns but he has tapped into a gold mine because he is saying what is on voter's minds. It is over shadowing many candidates and that is not a good thing. The RNC has to handle Trump with kid gloves because he could go renegade (3rd party)

I am looking forward to the next debate.

Personal Best Regards:

Totally agree.

Guest 08-22-2015 01:49 PM

A lot of civilians do not know how the gov handles classified material. The State Dept has primarily two email systems/Internet systems. One is the Unclassified network, which is basically your typical public Internet. It is used with gov servers to handle basic everyday gov work activity. Overseas, foreign nationals work along side of us on these Unclass systems. They are restricted from working with classified material/documents to the category of FOUO and SBU, which is For Official Use Only and Sensitive But Unclassified. The other network that the State Dept utilizes is the Classified network. All workstations and hard copy material of a classified nature, Confidential, Secret and Top Secret is kept in restricted areas, guarded by USMC guards. TS material is also kept in SCIFs, which are Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facilities. Basically, they are vaults. Foreign nationals and uncleared Americans are restricted from these areas. Some American embassy personnel are cleared up to confidential, some secret and a very few are cleared for Top Secret. Top Secret/SCI is even more restricted and requires an extensive back ground investigation. There are also different other caveats so to speak attached to TS, which are code word designations. These are special and require SCI clearance and you have to be read in to those programs. NO ONE is allowed to store classified information in their home. All classified storage areas have to be certified on an annual basis and has to be guarded by persons cleared for that level. Classified information is encrypted and transmitted via the classified network using that encryption media. It is impossible for that information to get from a classified network to a classified network without someone manually doing physical transfer of the decrypted media. The only way you could do such a thing is purposely. Normally, only spies have perpetrated information in that manner.

Hilary had TS/SCI information on her home computer, which was open to those servicing her system. Hilary transferred TS information on an unclassified system, which is a violation of federal law and espionage statutes. If the gov wishes, they could put her away for a very long time. She has violated some laws that even the worst spies didn't perpetrate. I am very, very surprised that she isn't incarcerated right now. They are treating her as if she is Royalty. I find it astonishing that she is even seen on TV. I have seen folks disappear into the justice system for less that she is alleged to have done. And by all evidence revealed, I can only conclude that she is being special treatment in difference to Bill, a former president.

Guest 08-22-2015 04:00 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1103222)
A lot of civilians do not know how the gov handles classified material. The State Dept has primarily two email systems/Internet systems. One is the Unclassified network, which is basically your typical public Internet. It is used with gov servers to handle basic everyday gov work activity. Overseas, foreign nationals work along side of us on these Unclass systems. They are restricted from working with classified material/documents to the category of FOUO and SBU, which is For Official Use Only and Sensitive But Unclassified. The other network that the State Dept utilizes is the Classified network. All workstations and hard copy material of a classified nature, Confidential, Secret and Top Secret is kept in restricted areas, guarded by USMC guards. TS material is also kept in SCIFs, which are Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facilities. Basically, they are vaults. Foreign nationals and uncleared Americans are restricted from these areas. Some American embassy personnel are cleared up to confidential, some secret and a very few are cleared for Top Secret. Top Secret/SCI is even more restricted and requires an extensive back ground investigation. There are also different other caveats so to speak attached to TS, which are code word designations. These are special and require SCI clearance and you have to be read in to those programs. NO ONE is allowed to store classified information in their home. All classified storage areas have to be certified on an annual basis and has to be guarded by persons cleared for that level. Classified information is encrypted and transmitted via the classified network using that encryption media. It is impossible for that information to get from a classified network to a classified network without someone manually doing physical transfer of the decrypted media. The only way you could do such a thing is purposely. Normally, only spies have perpetrated information in that manner.

Hilary had TS/SCI information on her home computer, which was open to those servicing her system. Hilary transferred TS information on an unclassified system, which is a violation of federal law and espionage statutes. If the gov wishes, they could put her away for a very long time. She has violated some laws that even the worst spies didn't perpetrate. I am very, very surprised that she isn't incarcerated right now. They are treating her as if she is Royalty. I find it astonishing that she is even seen on TV. I have seen folks disappear into the justice system for less that she is alleged to have done. And by all evidence revealed, I can only conclude that she is being special treatment in difference to Bill, a former president.

The politicians have ciecled the wagons to protect their own. And Obama is most definitely flying cover for her in the event he needs her slippery, unethical abilities for his POTUS after life.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.