NEWT GINGRICH: Are more lies the answer for Hillary? - Washington Times

Along with rehersals, staging, no interviews, no questions, phony southern accents, selfie set ups and the always standard fare LYING......and cackling.

I expect the intial opposing views to go after the publication and Gingrich avoiding the subject matter....per usual.

Originally Posted by Guest

I expect the initial opposing views to go after the publication and Gingrich avoiding the subject matter....per usual.

You are very correct because it is so much easier than dealing with the substantive issues . Just a couple of points from their " Play-Book ".

IE : Talking Points Rule #1 : " First change the focus and the subject ."

Rule # 2 : " Attack the speaker " also known as

an " Argumenum Ad Hominum " .

...obviously Poster 2 knows that BOTH Gingrich and the Washington Times are not worthy sources so he puts in his blurb.

You just have to love Newt, though. A real class act.

Give me Sec. Clinton anyday over the slime named Newt Gingrich.

'Nuff said. On to topics that matter- like coyotes pooping on your lanai.

Originally Posted by Guest

...obviously Poster 2 knows that BOTH Gingrich and the Washington Times are not worthy sources so he puts in his blurb.

You just have to love Newt, though. A real class act.

Give me Sec. Clinton anyday over the slime named Newt Gingrich.

'Nuff said. On to topics that matter- like coyotes pooping on your lanai.

Attack the messenger, and do it personally like calling him "slime", ignore the message totally and just do not comment on it, and always attack certain news sources.

Of course all from the sand trap.

Originally Posted by Guest

...obviously Poster 2 knows that BOTH Gingrich and the Washington Times are not worthy sources so he puts in his blurb.

You just have to love Newt, though. A real class act.

Give me Sec. Clinton anyday over the slime named Newt Gingrich.

'Nuff said. On to topics that matter- like coyotes pooping on your lanai.

Gee what a surprise post!!!!

And contrary to your hallucination NOBODY was asking anybody to choose Gingrich or anybody else as your fantasy response would try to infer.

And you think we think you are kidding in your nuff said line

Originally Posted by Guest

Gee what a surprise post!!!!

And contrary to your hallucination NOBODY was asking anybody to choose Gingrich or anybody else as your fantasy response would try to infer.

And you think we think you are kidding in your nuff said line

That last line is his trademark, after all, he is much more informed on EVERYTHING than EVERYBODY , and besides he thinks it is cute.