Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, Political talk (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/)
-   -   Nixing the Iran agreement (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/nixing-iran-agreement-158170/)

Guest 08-11-2015 03:27 PM

Did you say something? Are we comparing something here? Size? What? Are you taking a poll of Conservatives and Liberals that are for and against the treaty. Did you get Schumer's permission to speak for the left? Because he doesn't support it. Did you ask the 41% of the Dems in congress that support it, if you can speak for them? Why not ask the rest of the Dems in congress why they don't support it?

Did you say something?

Guest 08-11-2015 03:55 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1098799)
Interesting to note that two former George Bush senior diplomats back the treaty. Of course, these diplomats aren't as smart and well versed as the posters from the Villages who frequent this site when they aren't reading Alinsky, as if any of them really have.

Former Bush Diplomats Push Back on Criticism of Iran Deal « LobeLog

How come none of the Villages Tea Party holy roller crowd haven't jumped on the Michele Bachman bandwagon? Here's another link to her reassuring position in case some of you astute readers missed it.


Michele Bachmann Is 'Extremely Excited' for Iran Deal Because It Will Usher God's Judgement on the World as Foretold In Zechariah 12:3

Not sure of the intent of this post. Perhaps the poster might explain.

This Iran thing should not have partisan boundaries and I think we are seeing that. Yes, the majority of Republicans oppose it, as do over 50% of the Democrats in congress. I do not see it as partisan....

I like discussion on the deal itself instead of trying to make some kind of political points.

The question should be how posters feel about this deal.

By the way, you did understand the sarcastic point of the link to Bachmann ??

Guest 08-11-2015 04:32 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1098807)
Not sure of the intent of this post. Perhaps the poster might explain.

This Iran thing should not have partisan boundaries and I think we are seeing that. Yes, the majority of Republicans oppose it, as do over 50% of the Democrats in congress. I do not see it as partisan....

I like discussion on the deal itself instead of trying to make some kind of political points.

The question should be how posters feel about this deal.

By the way, you did understand the sarcastic point of the link to Bachmann ??

Who knows what that link to Bachmann was all about.
Personally, I do not like the deal. It's much too dangerous. We are giving them everything, and we are getting nothing. They get their money back, the sanctions are lifted. I'm not even worried that much about them creating a nuke. They can now buy one from the Russians. Nope, bad deal by incompetent people. A bad deal is NOT better than no deal.

Guest 08-11-2015 04:58 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1098830)
Who knows what that link to Bachmann was all about.
Personally, I do not like the deal. It's much too dangerous. We are giving them everything, and we are getting nothing. They get their money back, the sanctions are lifted. I'm not even worried that much about them creating a nuke. They can now buy one from the Russians. Nope, bad deal by incompetent people. A bad deal is NOT better than no deal.

Your point is well taken.

We make a deal, and within a week, the Iran military head goes to Russia IN VIOLATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS, and we say nothing. It just disappeared from the news.

Russia, as I have tried to say and supplied links from experts is our worry.

Iran will be economically sound. Iran can now trade with those they want to trade with with NO restrictions. Iran as already announced is buying ICBMs from Russia Iran can now sell oil to Russia which they need.

Iran has always been the leading state sponsor of terrorism. Now, they can do it with no fear of sanctions or anything.

I think it is scary and while we sure are not privy to the secret briefings, it appears from the Democrats leaving the fold, they are not hearing anything to make them feel better.

Guest 08-19-2015 05:03 PM

THIS is part of one of the secret agreements in this deal....

"VIENNA (AP) — Iran will be allowed to use its own inspectors to investigate a site it has been accused of using to develop nuclear arms, operating under a secret agreement with the U.N. agency that normally carries out such work, according to a document seen by The Associated Press."

AP Exclusive: UN to let Iran inspect alleged nuke work site - Yahoo News

It just gets better !!!

Guest 08-19-2015 07:29 PM

Yes, this is such a great deal. But, tell me what moron decided that it was a good idea to let Iran do their own inspections? Tell me, not the Harvard graduate....

Guest 08-20-2015 07:57 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1102074)
Yes, this is such a great deal. But, tell me what moron decided that it was a good idea to let Iran do their own inspections? Tell me, not the Harvard graduate....

hint; he resides in the WH, with his lap dog Kerry by his backside.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.