Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, Political talk (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/)
-   -   Obama ignored GA eligibility hearing (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/obama-ignored-ga-eligibility-hearing-48185/)

Guest 02-05-2012 08:58 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 448963)
You won't address the ignoring of a presented writ; a legally binding subpoena that the President ignored.

Of course you can't, or rather you won't. It's really telling about you, and Dale and the other fawning masses that you ignore this.

Oh!!, and the Secretary of State of Georgia still has to accept this partisan judge's ruling. We know the fix is in, but how deep?

It's not quite over yet.

Unless you work for the Department of Justice and have access to the subpoena, your credibility on this issue is suspect.

Guest 02-05-2012 09:06 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 448967)
Katz,
Sorry to hear about your brush with the law. Wasn't there an opportunity to contest the ticket? You would have had your witnesses vs the bus driver and the outcome would be up to a judge.

That is exactly what I did...However, my point is, I had no right to just not show up just because I thought the ticket's claim was bogus.

Guest 02-05-2012 09:09 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 449093)
Unless you work for the Department of Justice and have access to the subpoena, your credibility on this issue is suspect.

Oh enlighten me then, won't you? Under what circumstances are you permitted by law to ignore a legally issued subpoena?

Are there circumstances when you can just throw it in the trash?

Guest 02-05-2012 11:04 AM

I would have to read the subpoena to answer your question. I'm just guessing that expert legal minds have done just that.

Guest 02-05-2012 11:35 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 449097)
Oh enlighten me then, won't you? Under what circumstances are you permitted by law to ignore a legally issued subpoena?

Are there circumstances when you can just throw it in the trash?

And, Richie, as much as you've claimed I'm "spinning" it, I still haven't seen an answer to MY question.

That is - WHO got served? It's not like some GA sheriff walked up to the door of the White House and served the President.

I'm guessing that it HAD to be some member of a legal team - and THAT person (or persons) could be in a lot of trouble.

If it was legally served to the President's representative then THEY are on the hook. Any first year law student would probably say that the legal team was responsible for notifying the President and consulting him.

It may very well be that they didn't take it as serious as it should have been. If so, there would be more charges coming out of this.

Guest 02-05-2012 12:30 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 449149)
And, Richie, as much as you've claimed I'm "spinning" it, I still haven't seen an answer to MY question.

That is - WHO got served? It's not like some GA sheriff walked up to the door of the White House and served the President.

I'm guessing that it HAD to be some member of a legal team - and THAT person (or persons) could be in a lot of trouble.

If it was legally served to the President's representative then THEY are on the hook. Any first year law student would probably say that the legal team was responsible for notifying the President and consulting him.

It may very well be that they didn't take it as serious as it should have been. If so, there would be more charges coming out of this.

Your question seems retorical to me, or at least a very hard one to find an answer for. If I'm wrong and/or if Richie doesn't give you an answer, please do provide us with the answer for him.

As for the president's representative, they could be on the hook as you indicated. But where does the buck stop? Is the President not the chief executive, responsible for everything that happens in the White House adminiatration just as the president of most any corporation or any past president of the US? If not then we're in more trouble in this country than any of us previously thought!

Guest 02-05-2012 01:24 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 447038)
Sorry about above IP address. You need to go directly to nationalpatriot.com

Try this for more background:

thenationalpatriot.com » Blog Archive » OBAMA ELIGIBILITY COURT CASE…BLOW BY BLOW

Of course this will all blow over when it is discovered that the American born Malcolm X is Obama's real father. :duck:

All the ingredients for a delicious "swift boat" October surprise. Timing is everything. :shrug:

"I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts." -- Will Rogers

Guest 02-05-2012 02:12 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 449097)
Oh enlighten me then, won't you? Under what circumstances are you permitted by law to ignore a legally issued subpoena?

Are there circumstances when you can just throw it in the trash?

So why wasn't President Obama held in contempt of court by the Atlanta judge for ignoring a legally issued subpoena?

Guest 02-05-2012 04:50 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 449097)
Oh enlighten me then, won't you? Under what circumstances are you permitted by law to ignore a legally issued subpoena?

Are there circumstances when you can just throw it in the trash?

When the judge is a Georgia Red Neck with obvious racist intentions.

Guest 02-05-2012 04:56 PM

I'm through addressing all the asinine responses to the issuing of, and presidential contempt for this legally issued subpoena. As if the Georgia courts don't know how to present a subpoena. What idiocy. The Kool-Aid is just too strong and the lap dogs too busy humping the presidential leg for this to be debated with any intelligence.

Guest 02-05-2012 05:26 PM

So why no contempt of court charges against President Obama is a serious question which deserves a serious answer?

Guest 02-05-2012 06:01 PM

The whole thing is ridiculous. I find it insulting for any judge from any state to serve a sitting president. Everyone on here knows how strong I have been for Romney, but to do this silly childish bunk to a sitting US President is just plain foolish. Whats next, stop his limo for speeding on the way from the white house going to the capital building. I want an end to this silliness right now. You make us Republicans look like uneducated children.

Guest 02-05-2012 06:43 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 449293)
The whole thing is ridiculous. I find it insulting for any judge from any state to serve a sitting president. Everyone on here knows how strong I have been for Romney, but to do this silly childish bunk to a sitting US President is just plain foolish. Whats next, stop his limo for speeding on the way from the white house going to the capital building. I want an end to this silliness right now. You make us Republicans look like uneducated children.

Sitting presidents shouldn't be held accountable for their actions? Really! I guess that means that Nixon should have been held responsible for his Watergate coverups. I guess that means that Clinton should not have been held responsible for disgracing the White House with his little cigars. Where would you draw the line if not in the case of suspected fraud upon the American people. Would it be if a sitting Republican ordered that SanFranscisco be nuked because it's strongly left wing? Would it be if a sitting Democrat ordered The Villages leveled because it's strongly right wing? And YOU want to end this so called silliness RIGHT NOW!!! YOU? And by what authority would that be!!! Are you the owner of this site? :ohdear:

Guest 02-05-2012 07:14 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 449309)
Sitting presidents shouldn't be held accountable for their actions? Really! I guess that means that Nixon should have been held responsible for his Watergate coverups. I guess that means that Clinton should not have been held responsible for disgracing the White House with his little cigars. Where would you draw the line if not in the case of suspected fraud upon the American people. Would it be if a sitting Republican ordered that SanFranscisco be nuked because it's strongly left wing? Would it be if a sitting Democrat ordered The Villages leveled because it's strongly right wing? And YOU want to end this so called silliness RIGHT NOW!!! YOU? And by what authority would that be!!! Are you the owner of this site? :ohdear:

The Kool-Aid is really strong Sky. I can't believe the idiocy.

If this was GW they'd be screaming for impeachment and frothing at the mouth. This is one of the most incredible things I've seen on this forum.

Guest 02-05-2012 07:33 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 449324)
The Kool-Aid is really strong Sky. I can't believe the idiocy.

If this was GW they'd be screaming for impeachment and frothing at the mouth. This is one of the most incredible things I've seen on this forum.

Ain't that the truth. This kind of double standard and behavior has been happening long before Obama stole the DNC nomination out from Hillary. You'd think we'd be use to it by now! :ohdear:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.