Do you know what happens when you assume?

I see, by this post you are saying that you made those deletions to facts and made the misrepresentations on purpose....interesting....thanks for the clarification !!!!

No thanks, I certainly will not take time to read your posts. I do not find them interesting but rather boorish. You may have great intentions when writing them but they miss the points completely.

Ok..they were just the factual reports...but that is your call of course

I can Imagine Buggy's expression when my previous predictions come true and this come back to bite The Amateurs skinny butt.

He will rue his decision to act unilaterally.

Obama's DREAM Act is a constitutional nightmare | The Daily Caller

from the article you cite:
"Never one to fall victim to the adage that “consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds,” Obama made his “DREAM” announcement after declaring just last year during a speech to the National Council of La Raza, a Hispanic advocacy group, that the “idea of doing things on [his] own is very tempting,” but noted “that’s not how our system works.” Obviously he was wrong; that is precisely how his system of extra-constitutional government works.'"

i wonder if the obama action would be considered a flip flop or another evolution.

Seems even John Kyle from "immigration friendly" Arizona agrees with the basis of Obama's decision though perhaps not the way he would have done it. With the polls showing the majority support and agree with Obama on this issue it appears you may be wrong Richie. That must hurt. :laugh:

I think that this thread has been lost by some and some of the conservatives here have tried diverting from the FACT that Obama's decision has an approval rating of around 65% with 8 in 10 Democrats in favor of it and a whole lot of Republicans in favor, too.

It will be interesting to see how Mr. Romney handles it with his tough anti-immigration talk during the primaries and now flip flopping around like a tuna on a trawler.

The trouble with you bent at the knees worshipers of all things Obama is that you never see the forest for the trees.

We can debate the effects of Obama's run at the Constitution if you like, but it doesn't change the power grabbing unconstitutionality of it, which is what the critics are protesting.

If you stole something from me and I barged into your house with a gun to retrieve it, I would be breaking the law. People could talk about how it was understandable for me to reacquire my possessions in view of your thievery, but that wouldn't be the important aspect of this analogy.

The Republicans running for office know that a large percentage of Americans are stupid or ignorant enough to believe that the ends justify the means even if it damages the constitutional protections of the Constitution against one branch having too much power and control.

This is why they are pussy footing around the incredible constitutional nightmare of this power grab of the present occupant of the people's house.

All the comments by the leftists on this forum prove my point quite nicely.

Wow, old friend, Mrs. Lion had better switch you to decaf coffee in the morning. And you should take a Constitutional Law class at the local nightschool to learn a few things.

I think perhaps if you READ anything, not only on this individual thread but just in general, you would find that your continual talking about this has been debunked with FACTS.

Now, you told me on here last evening that you do not read my posts and that is up to you, but when they contain FACTS disputing all you say you should at least give them a quick scan before you keep saying things.