A book?
 

Where is this?

http://factcheck.org/2008/10/he-lied-about-bill-ayers/

http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/did...rom-my-father/

I thought it was a joke when I saw it and I still do! Please show me where it isn't...And no Trump links...

Thank you.

Are journalist, voters, etc. ever going to get back to focusing on substantive issues rather than obssessing about inconsequentil distractions. Journalist would be serving the greater good by ignoring nonsense like this. However they won't because journalist no longer aspire to be professional. I am thoroughly discussed

You are absolutely right. Bush was the prime example of DUH..I said it, I am the decider and I can not think of one thing I did wrong. Consistency born of ignorance is a deficet, not a virtue.

Analysts have determined that Bill Ayers, a known terrorist and best buddy of Barack Hussein Obama, or maybe he was called Barry Soereto back then, wrote one of the books by comparing Bill Ayer's writing style.

I think saying stoogette implied they are all female....Bachmann, Palin and O'Donnell. :thumbup:

What have I told you about showing me. I saw the video where he "admitted it" and clearly it was a joke!!!

All you have is writing style?

Did you read my links?

Bush was an honest and decent man. To even compare him to this no- nothing president is preposterous. Bush took responsibility for his actions. This current regime does nothing but blame and throw people under the bus. He apologizes for the greatest Nation in history and claims we are not exceptional. Tell that to the older people in Europe whom we saved in WWII.

She works for a private company who chooses to make this available for their employees, djplong. It isn't done because the government mandates it to be done; forcing something else on private citizens.

Anyway, you are correct about the limited field of intelligent GOP women running. I often wonder about that myself. Is it the good ole' boy networks at play or are the intelligent women too smart to get caught up in the games of the media and the Beltway in running for higher office. Either of those guesses make it a crying shame though.

One last thing my friend, please, you have know idea how it reads to me to see you saying she was replaced with bottle blond after bottle blond as if there is something wrong with that. I don't know you, BUT I know you are smarter than the perception that kind of statement gives off. I'm not blond by the way. Not naturally or from a bottle. I am a bottle red head though. I don't see what the color of a woman's hair has to do with her intelligence.

Let's keep pushing past the dark ages of when people are judged by the color of their hair. ;)

I know, I stand by my post.:thumbup: Pelosi, Read and Obama

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 384232) Bush was an honest and decent man. To even compare him to this no- nothing president is preposterous. Bush took responsibility for his actions. This current regime does nothing but blame and throw people under the bus. He apologizes for the greatest Nation in history and claims we are not exceptional. Tell that to the older people in Europe whom we saved in WWII.

And there you go again... Calling names. "no-nothing president" And... I think you mean... Know nothing.

If Obama discovered the cure for cancer, your thread would read, "Obama puts doctors out of business" - If he walked on water, your thread would read "Obama can't swim". :D

1, President Obama was never and still is not qualified by ability to be President. He was not qualified to be a senator by ability either. This says nothing about the man personally...he seems to be a good man and a family man, but he is in and has been in so far over his head. Anyone who reads his 2 auto biographies (can you believe he wrote two book about himself in that short time) and note even the descrepencies in the books, reads the archives of the Chicago newspapers, reads about WHO and WHAT his training was, realizes that he NEVER EVER ONCE managed anything would know this kind of presidency was coming.

2. Those who feel somehow compelled to throw stones at all the females who fnd them selves in headlines worry me. I know of no females who I would endorse either as President of Vice President but having said that...lets be fair.....any gaffe by a woman seems to be treated 125% more serious than any man's gaffes...and we have a President and Vice President who certanly have made their share. We critque Bachmann on farm susidies, yet if you read even a little about our Vice President or the Senate leader, and I pick them ONLY as an example as they surely are not in an exclusive club,and you will have lots of reading on the same stuff YET NEVER A WORD.
NOT MANY came on here and went after Charlie Rangel...a tax cheat who was working on our tax code but we do to this woman who is not even running for office. I dont see how you can justify that !!!

If, if, if...................just one positive accomplishment that actually benefitted the state of the union would be nice. Sorry, I can't think of one. Oh, and to offset some responses...........I want proof of the action, not just words.

Speaking Of Hillary...
 

Does anyone think she'll re-up for Secretary of State if Obama is re-elected?

Better yet, will she hang around until the end of the first term? If she bailed during the "election season", that might be more than even a $1 billion campaign fund could overcome.

*laughing* Richie... I tried to mess with you on another thread when you said you liked to mess with the Dems... And this is the one that got you??? :D

OK.. That was really meant as a joke... But.... to answer your question. I don't know how he can do anything when the republicans refuse to pas anything he tries to do and continue to walk out on their own bills and policies... What's that about????

Just makes me want to put more Dems in to see what He can do....:D

I'm not upset at all Angie, just continuing the conversation. Obama had 2 years with unassailable dominance with a Democrat controlled House and Senate. The Republicans could hardly get a word in edgewise. Obama did get things accomplished, just nothing to advance "the state of the union", which was my premise.

Obama has accomplished things in service to his vision of the new progressive socialist state he is working to create and shove down the throat of the American people in direct violation of our Constitutional protections; and in effect, that is how he is damaging the state of the union.

You want more Democrats?; you don't think the country has been damaged enough?