Well, at least you are willing to admit that we, as a country, are circling the drain. That's a start, I guess.

Let's hope so. But it is not going to be our grandchildren that will rip us apart...
It is our generation and our current leaders. We need a JFK. The only problem the progressives would run him out of town on a rail.

Other than being married to Bill Clinton, and recognizing that had she never married him we NEVER would have heard of her ... tell us exactly what her qualifications are please.

Gee the subject was O'Malley as a candidate VS Clinton. How amazing the thread is completely polluted by the same crap as any other subject.

Conclusion? It does not matter what the subject the antagonizer will take the opposite side while still slamming, degrading, name calling, change the subject, dodge and weave away from the subject matter continuing to bash the opposition.

No matter the subject.

As was proposed some time ago, since we do not have the advantage of an ignore option, just do not engage. The antagonists merry go round, by design, goes....NOWHERE.

Good post, especially in this forum! :BigApplause: Posters will come to this site and hide behind thier keyboards and say crap they would never say in public or in this forum if they had to use thier real names or TOTV screen name.

It is difficult at best to have an open and thoughtful discussion here (or any of the forums on this site) without the "haters" spewing thier crap!

You had to reach pretty far up to come up with that term ... hope you didn't do any internal damage.

Democrats want their candidate to have a decisive win. That is why we are backing Sec. Clinton. O'Malley would not be a certain win. Good man, excellent governor but not enough experience YET. Maybe after being VP.

Clinton is a sure win.

She has the base that Republicans cannot get into their camp because of the Neanderthal thinking of their party. Republicans have not figured these are Progressive times and NOT days of Joe McCarthy.

:ohdear::yuck:barfbarfbarf

Sounds as though you long for the days of Tail Gunner Joe.

Do not forget that if you are not progressive, you are regressive. Look that up in your Funk & Wagnall.

I haven't seen one iota of truth to back up the fiction that O'Malley's star is starting to shine brighter. Where are the links? Where is he in the polls?

It is doubtful that O'Malley would ever be considered for a spot in the Clinton cabinet after what he said last week-end about the presidency and dynasties. It's time for O'Malley to find a job.

Hillary Clinton?s New HQ Is ?Brooklyn Cool? -- NYMag


BTW: Now that Hillary Clinton has reportedly signed a lease for her election headquarters, she has only 15 days to announce her candidacy, according to election laws.

The term "progressive' is nothing more than lipstick-on-a-pig wordsmithing that socialists and egalitarians use to disguise their true intentions

Just
 

Another wingnut tea partier. My god can't you people even think for yourselves. You must have conference calls with your gang of six to come up with these idiotic statements!

And some appear to do no better than pull their comments outta
their :censored: