Hey, tweeting Ivanka Trump does not count.............:a20:

I Facebook her along with many other women.

Well, Trump saved American Taxpayers a couple trillion bucks by backing out of the Paris agreement. Thank you President Trump. It was garbage anyway. How any "educated" liberal could go along with it, is beyond logic. America is already doing better than the other countries, WITHOUT the stupid agreement that does not hold anyone else to the same standards. The agreement is just Obama's way to spread the wealth, period. Obama was an idiot. Did I say "was?"

I was thinking more of Susie Essman from Curb Your Enthusiasm.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Love that show. Not so much Susie Essman's character.

You facebook with other women? :shrug:

There is a very good chance Tal is a sterile transgender.

Not that there is anything wrong with that.

Ever been to China ? I have and you can`t breathe the air !

No birds at all within the city of Bejing everyone wears a mask to try to filter the pollution out of the air they breathe .
However the US is the most guilty ! Yeah right !

Because they sit in front of their TV and believe what the talking head tells them.

Does anyone care that The Paris Agreement will do almost nothing to reduce global warming and will cost the U.S. trillions while shifting jobs from The U.S. to China as well as allowing China to continue to pollute?

Watch this. and before you start going off about how Prager U is not an actual university and it is a conservative biased site, please give us some facts that show this is wrong.

The Paris Climate Agreement Won't Change the Climate - YouTube

Bjorn Lomborg - Wikipedia

Would have to really look into where this man is getting his information from and how he makes his calculations and the like.

Please don't strain the little liberal brain with logic.

Obama's goal was the redistribution of american wealth elsewhere.

His legacy is horrific, and just wait till the spying and leaks get fully revealed.

See I knew someone just couldn't do it. Instead of presenting facts that dispute what is presented you simply attack the source.

What is he saying that isn't true?

Do you deny that he is an expert in the field? The Wikipedia article that you posted seems to verify that he is.

That video posted is by this man. Who just makes a lot of assertions in it. He does not present the facts as you usually are supposed to say how you got those facts if these are just projections of the rise of temperatures in the next 100 years. That's speculation though.

And is he an expert in global warming? No he is not.