I have attempted to find at unbiased source , where I can take a logical view of the 2 and be knowledgeable of the lies of the 2 to compare , fact check dot org SEEMS ok but if you have a better one let me know

I searched the site using your keywords.

site:factcheck.org liar of the year obama

results: The ‘King of Whoppers': Donald Trump

The ‘King of Whoppers': Donald Trump
He dominates our annual review of political falsehoods.
By FactCheck.orgPosted on December 21, 2015 | Updated on December 21, 2015

Where did I go wrong? Show us the factcheck.org liar of the year obama link.

This sounds too much like a set up or definitely bait.

It presumes that the alternative, Clinton, is the better choice. Motive suspect right there.

No matter what Trumps may have said or not said or how he said it .....is much better than that which Clinton has done and did or not did (Beghazzi).

A "good" republican would not make such a theatric appeal spectacle.

Definitely bait.

Pi$$ poor fear tactic by the opposition in their hour(s) of desparation.

So go ahead and vote to put The Clinton Crime Family back in power Version2.0 . And then rest your weary head .

You know that you want to do it . You want Cheryl Mills , Valarie Jarret , Huma Abedin running the presidency .
And they will be running things just as George Soros directs them to .
So before you cast your vote you just might wish to do some checking about the folks I mentioned above .
Then of course understand that Loretta Lynch will be running the Justice Department . So if you feel that the DOJ and FBI are operating in an unbiased manner then by all means keep the entire gang in power .
And I must assume that you feel that " Pay for Play " is all just fine . And that selling the Russians control over 20% of our Uranium is a golden idea as well .
Just as is giving up our control of the Internet to some international actors at a time of such world strife .
Finally if you feel that The United Nations should be deciding which international treaties we enter instead of the US Senate .
If you feel that the UN should be regulating much of our day to day lives then by all means vote for the Clintons .

I have an open mind and want to get a factual logical discussion regarding the 2 candidates. Logical comments are very welcome

That is the funniest, lamest, most outrageous line of BS ever heard to date.

Logical (?) conclusion is;

to vote for a feloTo vote for a liar, reckless, careless, unsophisticated technical, lack of security knowledge person (as testified by the director of the FBI).

Logical???? Better watch what is mixed with the meds as something has seriously :censored: up the reasoning.

facts please .lets talk logically on this

Fact Checking Internet Sites
 

There are at least two site you can go to, both of which say they accurately check the facts of both national and state candidates. There are probably many more, some of which may also be neutral but some are likely just mouth-pieces for one party or the other.

They are www dot factcheck dot org

and

www dot politifact dot com

Obviously you have to delete the spaces and convert "dot" to a keyboard period. I won't say which, if either is the better site.

PLEASE...can you supply some detail relative to corruption that you speak of. It would be appreciated and with some detail.

I continually hear this from Trump and his followers with no facts. I have.seen lots of credible, validate proof about Trump, but everything about Clinton seems to be a lot of talk and insinuation..void of facts to validate CORRUPTION.

I am WRONG it was politifact who made Obama liar of the year . fact check dot org does have a lot of the Clinton lies as well

Are you serious? Do you live under a rock or just on another planet?

I am afraid logical discussion on this forum is a lost cause.

We have two flawed candidates, but the folks on here are convinced that Trumps allegations about Clinton are true (based, I think if years of these accusations made by his campaign managers who ran Fix and Breitbart, the radical right wing site)

They refuse to listen to facts presented by people concerning Trump.

Thus, objectivity is not going to happen.

This entire thing is eerie....they seem to want to go back to the 80s and 90s, bring back industries are dead, and now they chant at his rallies to bring up Lewinsky. For what reason, you will need to ask them.

So you have no credible FACTS to present or simply the same old charges

Google: "Clinton Corruption". There are plenty of articles listed to chose from. I don't have the time nor the inclination to educate Liberals that have their heads buried in the sand.

OK fair enough , so long as you have all the facts that is all I can ask , make sure you spend one hour on each one to look at the history .

thanks for your time