Nay! You don't reward someone for breaking the law.

My heart says NAY, but my brain keeps asking how you would deny amnesty to the millions already here. The most important task for the U.S. is to just stop the flow.

NAY! NO AMNESTY.
We should also stop paying their health costs, welfare, etc.
Go home and come back legally...support yourself and your family...and then you'll be welcomed.

I say nay as well.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Ju5Ar2BWAwQ

Thanks
Steve

YES & NO
The answer as I see it is fairly easy. `. Every time an illegal is found in the country, an investigation in to his criminal record (if any). None = amnesty with some conditions to becoming legal. Crimes = immediate trip to where ever he/she came from. No questions, no "poor me" nothing. Outa Here. In time the numbers will reduce. It really is impratical (sp) to deport them all. This plan could work.

OH FIRST SEAL THE BORDERS TIGHT. NO MORE COME IN PERIOD

PEEPOP

Nay!

Nay!!!

Allowing amnesty to illegals is a slap in the face of those who came into this country via the legal process and to those who are waiting in line.

Allowing amnesty is an encouragement and invitation to others who would cross the border illegally.

Illegal aliens are felons and, when identified, they should be prosecuted.

Lock the borders. Let's begin to clean up the immigration mess we've allowed.

NAY!!!!!

Nay!
Our country is on the way out now. Amnesty would push us out and close the door behind us.

By the way, has anyone read The Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire and compared it to what is going on in our country now? Scary

See what Pat Buchanan had to say about this issue.

September 7, 2007
PJB: Buenas Noches, America
by Patrick J. Buchanan

“Mexico does not end at its borders. … Where there is a Mexican, there is Mexico.”

That astonishing claim by Mexican President Felipe Calderon, in his state of the nation address at the National Palace Sunday, brought his audience wildly cheering to its feet.

Were the United States a serious nation, Calderon’s claim that Mexico extends into the United States would have produced an instant demand from the U.S. ambassador for clarification. Failing to receive it, he would have packed his bags, and the United States would be on the verge of severing diplomatic relations.

In an earlier time, U.S. troops would be rolling to the border.

For this is not the first time an arrogant Mexican ruler has made a claim to extra-territorial rights inside the United States and, indeed, to U.S. territory. Mexico’s presidents have gotten into a habit of suborning treason against the United States.

In 1995, President Ernesto Zedillo told a Dallas audience of U.S. citizens of Mexican descent, “You are Mexicans, Mexicans who live north of the border” – i.e., you owe loyalty to Mexico, not Uncle Sam.

In 1997, Zedillo brought a Chicago gathering of La Raza to its feet by exclaiming, “I have proudly affirmed that the Mexican nation extends beyond the territory enclosed by its borders.”

In 1998, Mexico changed its constitution to restore citizenship to Mexican-Americans who have taken an oath of allegiance to the United States and renounced loyalty to any other country.

Purpose: loosen their ties of loyalty to the United States, re-knit their ties of loyalty to Mexico, and persuade Mexican-Americans to vote Mexico’s interests in the USA. Put Mexico first, even if you have taken an oath of allegiance to the United States.

In June 2004, President Vicente Fox took the Zedillo road to the Mexican-American community in Chicago. There, he, too, declared: “We are Mexicans that live in our territories, and we are Mexicans that live in other territories. In reality, there are 120 million that live together and are working together to construct a nation.”

President Fox was saying that the construction of his nation is taking place – inside our nation. Is that not sedition?

In 2005, the head of the Institute of Mexicans Abroad, Carlos Gutierrez, asserted, “The Mexican nation goes beyond the borders that contain Mexico.”

What these Mexicans politicians are saying is that Mexico extends into the United States, and the first loyalty of all men and women of Mexican ancestry is, no matter where they live, to Mexico.

Mexico’s rulers believe in a nation of history, blood and soil that pre-existed, and supersedes, any pledge of allegiance any Mexican may make to another country, especially to the United States.

Is George W. Bush vaguely aware of any of this?

At the Quebec summit, Bush mocked the idea of a merger of a North American Union as a fantasy of conspiracy theorists. “It’s quite comical actually, to realize the difference between reality and what some people on TV are talking about.”

Calderon laughed it off, too. “I’d be happy with one foot in Mexicali and one in Tijuana.” But in his state of the nation, Felipe is talking about one foot in Mexico and one in Los Angeles.

Is Bush oblivious to what his friend Vicente Fox laid down in Madrid in 2002 as the long-term strategy of Mexico?

“Eventually, our long-range objective is to establish with the United States … an ensemble of connections and institutions similar to those created by the European Union, with the goal of attending to future themes as important as … the freedom of movement of capital, goods, services and persons. The new framework we wish to construct is inspired in the example of the European Union.”

Fox is talking about the erasure of borders.

Whether Bush is aware of this really makes no difference. For the real issue is not what the Mexican regime has in mind, but whether we can stop it, or whether we have passed a point of no return.

Today, already, there are 45 million Hispanics in the United States, perhaps half from Mexico, and 37 million immigrants.

Now, Steve Camarota of the Center for Immigration Studies projects – using official Census Bureau figures of 1.25 million legal and illegal immigrants entering and staying in the United States every year – a U.S. population of 468 million by 2060.

We will add as many people – 167 million – in the next half-century as the entire population of the United States when JFK was elected.

Some 105 million of these folks will be immigrants and their children. That 105 million is equal to the entire population of Mexico, whence most of these folks will be coming.

No wonder Mexican presidents are coming out of the closet about what is up. They know the gringos can’t stop it, for they have the American establishment on their side.

Buenas noches, America.

NAY, NAY and NAY. Agree with all said above. BTW "Kahuna", the Mexicans aren't the only illegals. There are Brazilians, Europeans, Middle East, Russians, Chinese, etc.. It's all a game. Get a US Visa,(or don't), then disappear when you get here. Use a phony SS Card or Green Card for employment (no way for employer to check validity, (privacy, you know).

To ignore the borders is tantamount to treason on the part of our officials. What other country in the world can you walk in and get the governmental "welcome" you do here. It's just NUTS!!

Can you say North American Union. It's coming I fear, as the "solution" to the immigration problem. No borders, no problem.

Not good news!

All Goods posts

no way

Nay. I know hard working people who waited many years to come to this country legally. They learned the language; became citizens and contributed to the society, paid their taxes, raised their kids, and are now retired. If we allow illegal aliens, people who broke the laws of this country, to become citizens without going through the legal means, it's like slap in the face of all those others, including my relatives who did it the legal way. I say nay,

My father immigrated to this country legally, learned the language, waved the US flag, not his home countries flag, did not demand rights, and melded into the American culture and society and became an American citizen, and earned his way. I've read repeated posts on TOTV from Canadians and Brits who are only allowed here in the US 180 days or so a year. In the meantime, we have thousands of illegals pouring over the borders weekly from Mexico and other South American countries. Yes, I agree that there are lots of illegals from other countries including Europe, but their numbers are dwarfed by the numbers coming from our south. It isn't only Bush who won't address this issue. It's every one of those damn politicians who are only concerned about their votes. SHUT THE BORDER!!!!!
God, that felt good.

Nay! Nay! Nay! Lets deport all the bleeding hearts too who think we should give away our country to people who have no respect for the laws of this country. Any politician who says he/she is for amnesty of illegal aliens has, indeed, lost my vote. Instead of providing free medical, dental, and educational services to illegal aliens, let us use the same money to hire more Border Patrol and seal the borders for good.