I personally believe this is exactly what the DNC is most concerned about.
The fear that she may get to be the candidate but unable to win.......just like the 2008 conclusion when she was not as shady a character!

Clinton is polled at 11% of Dems saying "No way" would they vote for her.

I'd be interested in seeing a poll of just the Independents regarding who they would vote for. Bet Clinton would not get enough to be elected.

A lot of folks have suggested that it's too late for Biden to enter the race. That he doesn't have the money for the campaign or he's waited too long to get any good campaign time in. I think that what they overlook is the fact that he is already well known to most Americans. Better than any of the other candidates. He need not even enter campaign mode to beat Hilary, as indicated by several polls. Well, actually they show a bigger lead against the Republican candidates than Hilary, but who's counting?

From all the posts that have been placed on this forum with the illegal things done by Obama, the malfeasance of his team in the Administration and the general dissappointed with Democrat policies for the past 7 years - it would seem to me that Republicans have absolutely no worries about a Presidential victory in 2016.

So, since obviously all Americans know that Hillary is a liar and should be in prison, why continue to berate her?

Wouldn't a better use of time, effort and money be to find the perfect Republican nominee who will do the very best for the USA?

...and the perfect Republican nominee who would be the best for the USA would be ------ and the reason that he/she would be the best for the country is -----.

It does not matter who it is they could not :censored: it up anymore than Obama has to date!!!
And it does not matter who it is they would rise head, shoulders and entire body above Clinton.

Really, that was not a mature post whatever.

You say you do not care which Republican gets to be President because they could not foul the country up anymore than Obama? Does this mean you do not care if the country is fouled up for the next 4-8 years just as bad as Obama did but you would rather have a Republican do the fouling?

The question was a legit question. Who - of the 17 or so Republican candidates - do you think would make the best President and why?

Obviously unable to answer. No problem.

I just love the way some churn and burn when they do not get an answer they expect or one not in agreement.

Some categorize it as a no answer....which is one opinion but incorrect.

Another goes ape by exptrapolating so far out in left field noboby can see, hear or understand.

Just because it was mentioned nobody could screw it up anymore than Obama does not mean, not even close, that somebody else could continue screwing it up.

Or how about a real stretch for some of you....it really means the worst of the litter can do better than Obama.

First of all most of the American people know who the candidates are. Nobody knew BHO when he was in the Clinton shadow.

It is terrible to be constrained by narrow thinking!

Your point will be missed in this forum. We have gone by the tipping point where more people are living off taxes than paying them. When this happened true conservative polititians went the way of the dinosaur. As long as polititians can spend money without raising taxes there will be no change. Right now there are no losers, except the younger generation, when this obsecene spending spree continues. Until Hillary, Jeb, Trump, or any of the others have to look people in the eye and say "you'll have to pay more taxes because of this spending I support" we will continue towards the edge of cliff. A real balanced budget requirement would change politics as we all know it.

Alright then, which of the 17 candidates do You think is best for the country and why? No right or wrong answer but just reasonable justification would be nice to see.

We can all agree that a Republican is far better than the Democratic candidates but which one?

Mitt Romney with Carli FIvorian VP.

Fiorina that is!

Who is all? Sounds exclusionary.

Dear Guest: I happen to agree withe second part of your question that any Republican nominee would be better than any Democratic nominee essentially because the socialist policies of Obama would continue ( actually forced) under any Democratic Administration and we simply can't continue down this path of self-destruction.

The first part of your question needs to be refined to what you mean by "is best for the country?" More to the point the "best"candidate.

The popularity of Trump, Carson, Fiorina and yes even Sanders clearly illustrates that voters are no longer going to tolerate the status quo. They are weary and wary of the same old same old promises and essentially believe that in most cases the political class (career politicians) all belong to an old boy/girls club and it will be business as usual if any one of them gets elected. This frustration is what is driving the polls. Even a nut case like Sanders is looking good because he is preaching populous propaganda.

This is the sentiment now. Will it continue? If so anyone of the aforementioned candidates can walk away with the nomination.

Personal Best Regards: