Quote:
Posted by Guest
(Post 440409)
I feel that's really a simplistic outlook and a far fetched kind of conspiracy theory. I really doubt he's thinking of his advertisers on this subject. If you've listened to Rush over the years you know he eschews any exercise in weight loss and downplays the importance of it in that aspect. I thinks it's a foolish thing, but he's entitled to live his life the way he sees fit. He thinks genetics play the greatest role in your life longevity, and science doesn't prove him wrong.
Comparing body chemistry to the life of nations? Cute, but hard to portray parallels. Nations have died for many reasons.
|
Is it a "conspiracy theory" when a business man plans to make a profit? I just happen to think that when he has a choice of whether to take the side of his business associates and his listeners (i.e., potential customers) he takes the side of his business associates.
Anyway, I finally had a chance to read the material from the links you provided and here's my response:
A critique on the Rush Limbaugh transcript of Jan. 13, 2012: "If You Want To Live Forever, Don't Get Old."
It seems that Rush's job, as spokesperson for the fast food industry, is to dispirit anyone who's trying to take responsibility by living a healthy livestyle. He took a statement by Edgehopper and used it as a springboard to promote an attitude of defeatism relative to health and longevity.
He proudly carries a brand new fast-food-industry banner that says: "Everyone, as they get older, will get sick and die." And, as far as he and the industry are concerned, their best customers will likely die sooner, rather than later, and that's okay with them. It seems that, nowadays, everything and anything goes, in the name of fast-food-industry profits.
I agree that we need to be wary of government interfering in our lives and in our ability to make free-market choices. But, at the same time, we also need to be wary of the fast-food-industry, their hired guns, like Rush Limbaugh, and their industry lobbyists.
I find it interesting that the long-winded-rant from Rush seems to have come soon after the chapter 11 bankruptcy of Yum Brands, the maker of Twinkies and other such junk-food items. The reason given for the bankruptcy is that people are becoming more health conscious and choosing such items as yogurt and/or fresh fruit rather than high calorie junk like Twinkies. Potentially, this could spell trouble for the rest of the fast food industry as well. Is it any wonder that Rush went into overdrive against the notion that a healthy lifestyle can yield dividends?
Could there be a clause in his 40 millian dollar contract that stipulates that he defend or enhance the desirability of fast-food as often as possible or on an as-needed basis?
In order to draw in his loyal listeners, rather than stick to the main issue of health, he loaded down the issue with politics as a means of stiring their emotions and fears. That's what you do when you have a weak argument and your whole "schtich" is based on, "advancing age = sickness and death."
As part of his political ploy, it's almost as if he's telling us to fight liberalism by practicing poor lifestyle habits: "Yeah, we'll show those liberals! We'll stuff ourselves with MORE fast food, NOT LESS!"
He's hoping that a lot of his listeners will buy into his defeatist mind-set and start "chowing down" on a lot of high calorie junk foods. (He's asking us to drink the cool-aid.) So what if we age faster and die sooner. For a talk-show host with no conscience, it's all in a day's work.