![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Not going to insult you.....its not worth it! |
Quote:
Just exactly did your highly educated legal mind get to this idea. Or did you attend a Faux News sermon this morning? Its the latter!!!! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
A recess appointment would be a quick way but Pres. Obama knows that make the do-nothing obstructionist Republicans even worse. The President will submit his appointee to the Senate and let the American public see once again how it is the Republicans holding up progress. In an election year, this is a very savvy move for the President - and will be used by the Democrats.
|
Found dead, alone in his hotel room with a pillow over his head, no security detail and no autopsy. I am not a conspiracy nut but doesn't this seem fishy ? The most Conservative Justice on the Supreme Court. A little too convenient for this POS POTUS. (Use your own imagination on POS abbreviation)
|
Quote:
|
Sure, Obama will submit his appointee to congress, they will delay or turn it down, and then he will make a recess appointment. That is his MO and he does not care what the public thinks, because he always knows better what is good for us. The tyrant's ego supersedes what is right for the country.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I wish he could make a recess appointment. But unfortunately, the law requires Senate confirmation. And we know the Senate will not confirm anyone he nominates, no matter how good a candidate he or she is. Their modus operandi is to block everything Obama does, whether or not it is good for the country. An interesting outcome of this expected prolonged confirmation process, is that the cases on the docket for the Supreme Court will be subject to 4-4 ties. That means an Obama victory for the cases involving unions, The Affordable Health Care Act and contraceptives, and electoral districts. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Obama is the current President and will be for nearly a year. Reagan did it!!! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
On July 27, 2007, Schumer told his ACS audience:
" How do we apply the lessons we learned from Roberts and Alito to be the next nominee, especially if—God forbid—there is another vacancy under this president? … [F]or the rest of this president’s term and if there is another Republican elected with the same selection criteria let me say this: We should reverse the presumption of confirmation. The Supreme Court is dangerously out of balance. We cannot afford to see Justice Stevens replaced by another Roberts, or Justice Ginsburg by another Alito. Given the track record of this president and the experience of obfuscation at the hearings—with respect to the Supreme Court, at least—I will recommend to my colleagues that we should not confirm a Supreme Court nominee except in extraordinary circumstances." :boom: |
Quote:
Court strikes down recess appointments: In Plain English : SCOTUSblog |
The body is not cold and the repubs are circulating the wagons.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Evidently God wants Obama to appoint another Justice, that's why he cashed in Scalia's chips. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Scalia was a very, very evil man.
He is the one responsible for stopping the recount in Florida that led to the most disastrous eight years in American History |
Nasty, disresctful, partisan bitching.
|
Quote:
|
Did the troll leave for school yet?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
No different than naming one accomplishment Hilary had as Sec State. |
the vultures, republicans, democrats and those on this forum started circling 5 minutes after Scalia's death was announced.
The disrespectful, totally bad example set by Obama, McConnel, all the candidates and the media in a frenzy to start another movement that will only further divide this country. If we truly had a leader in the WH instead of Obama he would have set aside a time for the mourning of and paying tribute to a very significant figure in the history of the USA....like him or not. Then after that time let the carnivorous free for all commence over how to further divide the country. And the lemmings who follow suit are too busy carrying their party flag to take note that the "political party" is vying for and looking at a possible power grab. It is either liberal this or consrvative that. If, then, maybe, etc. Somebody remind me if or when they talk about a candiate that is good for the betterment of America? For the good of the people? For better, clearer justice? We the people are nothing more than pawns and blindly obedient lemmings to partisan divisiveness while the power grabbers in Washington look down and smile at how stupid we the people have become.....in behalf of the all powerfull "POLITICAL PARTY"........the elected in Washington DC are the only members of that party! |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.