And she could have been our Vice President

 
Thread Tools
  #61  
Old 06-05-2011, 09:12 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You got that right, Wayne. Sarah can make money hand over fist from duping these wing-nuts into thinking she is Mother Theresa in a grizzly bear suit with lipstick.
  #62  
Old 06-05-2011, 09:32 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbugs View Post
You got that right, Wayne. Sarah can make money hand over fist from duping these wing-nuts into thinking she is Mother Theresa in a grizzly bear suit with lipstick.
I am so glad to hear liberals are sticking with their name calling. You will not win the next election name calling. Name calling is a symptom of no class and no winning arguments.
JJ
  #63  
Old 06-05-2011, 10:58 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JimJoe View Post
I am so glad to hear liberals are sticking with their name calling. You will not win the next election name calling. Name calling is a symptom of no class and no winning arguments.
JJ
All they got JimJoe, it's all they got.
  #64  
Old 06-06-2011, 06:53 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JimJoe View Post
I am so glad to hear liberals are sticking with their name calling. You will not win the next election name calling. Name calling is a symptom of no class and no winning arguments.
JJ
JimJoe, JimJoe, na na na na na na.
  #65  
Old 06-06-2011, 07:18 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Getting back to the first post and topic of this thread, turns out Sarah's comments were correct. Not only did she's defend her comments over the weekend, historians looked into the issue and turns out what she was talking about was absolutely correct.

"Part of his ride was to warn the British that were already there. That, hey, you're not going to succeed. You're not going to take American arms. You are not going to beat our own well-armed persons, individual, private militia that we have," she added. "He did warn the British."

Paul Revere even wrote about it himself.
  #66  
Old 06-06-2011, 07:26 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dklassen View Post
Getting back to the first post and topic of this thread, turns out Sarah's comments were correct. Not only did she's defend her comments over the weekend, historians looked into the issue and turns out what she was talking about was absolutely correct.

"Part of his ride was to warn the British that were already there. That, hey, you're not going to succeed. You're not going to take American arms. You are not going to beat our own well-armed persons, individual, private militia that we have," she added. "He did warn the British"
Yep...."with bells and shots".......and bullhorn as he drove his Range Rover through Boston. That's what I heard she said.
  #67  
Old 06-06-2011, 07:33 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Given you started the thread, I think it's funny she knows more about American history than you do.
  #68  
Old 06-06-2011, 08:14 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dklassen View Post
Given you started the thread, I think it's funny she knows more about American history than you do.
Yeah.....she's a real Gordon S. Wood....not.
  #69  
Old 06-06-2011, 08:16 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

dk,just not true....revisionist history again!
  #70  
Old 06-06-2011, 08:31 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Waynet. Prove it or stop perpetuating a lie.
  #71  
Old 06-06-2011, 08:36 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dklassen View Post
Waynet. Prove it or stop perpetuating a lie.
Easy for you to just throw crap out and then when people dispute you...."prove it, prove it"
  #72  
Old 06-06-2011, 08:38 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default Impressive reply

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaleMN View Post
JimJoe, JimJoe, na na na na na na.
Nice reply. Please post additional intelligent responses.
JJ
  #73  
Old 06-06-2011, 08:39 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Why don't some of you people just admit it and move on. You were wrong, you did no research and you don't care that you were wrong. Nothing more than a continued smear campaign by the left that again turns out to be a big fat pathetic lie.

Quote:
So how was it that Palin got it right and just about everyone else got it wrong about Paul Revere and his famous ride? Most peoples' knowledge about Revere begins and ends with the famous Longfellow poem, which somewhat fudged the actual history of the ride that night in 1775. Palin either has actually cracked open a book or, just as likely, was paying attention to the lecture visitors get when they go to Paul Revere's home, unlike her critics.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ac/20110605/..._the_british_1
  #74  
Old 06-06-2011, 09:44 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaleMN View Post
Easy for you to just throw crap out and then when people dispute you...."prove it, prove it"
OK, all you dunderheads acting like children. Would you believe that Gov. Palin was correct if you heard it directly from Paul Revere himself in his own words?

Is that enough for you?

http://www.masshist.org/database/img...pc=&pid=#page1


Maybe these historians can convince you that Gov. Palin's knowledge of American history eclipses yours. Of course, there are a few historians who just can't believe the scholarship of Gov. Palin and figures she must have been lucky to get this unknown little piece of history correct. They're dunderheads like you.

http://www.bostonherald.com/news/us_...rical_account/
  #75  
Old 06-06-2011, 11:04 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The Villages Florida
 


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:30 PM.