Quote:
Posted by Guest
(Post 273591)
I saw the HUG thing completely differently....the sad thing with the electronic age is we are really unable to tell, for the most part, the intent of the poster. So I took it at face value. I did meet some TEA party people and they did scare me....all the yelling, taking over meetings to what end? And the signs.....the guns. Guns scare me big time.
I have been to several anti-war protests all peaceful...no rock throwing.
As I have 3 nephews in the service, one has been to the war zone 5 times winning the purple heart on his Th tour, I expect the President to only use the troops in defense of the United States. I struggle with the Afghan war as the 9/11 attacks came from there...but there was no excuse to invade a country that did NOT attack us. I still say both Bush and his administration totally lied in the run up to the war and all through out the 8 years...leaving the current administration holding the bag.
You don't like the main stream media and I think Fox Noise is a mouth piece for the Republican party. I mainly watch Morning Joe, PBS Evening News and Rachel Maddow. Today I took in about 1 hour a Fox Noise just to check in.
|
Even at face value I still felt that it wasn't an appropriate response and did nothing to advance the topic or discussion.
Moving on.....It sounds like you happened to be at one of the 'Town Hall' events, rather than a TEA party event. Those events have had a history of degenerating into shouting matches when people, who are upset because their representatives are ignoring their input, are talked down to or have fun made of their concerns and ridiculed for their concern. The make-up of the TEA parties is truly bi-partisian, both racial and political. (actually more than bi-. All parties and races) All are citizens concerned about the way things are going. As for the signs, I really get a kick out of the creativity, except for the 'fringe kooks' that EVERY group seems to attract. Accept those for what, or who, they are. Guns scare the he** out of a lot of people and, rightly so, when in the hands of idiots, incompetents, young children and those who want to settle a grudge. Any sane person would be scared in that situation. I have no problem when in the hands, or holster, of someone who respects AND fears the power of that gun.
I realize that ALL protests don't degenerate into violence but, since NONE of the news services spend much time on peaceful gatherings, a disproportionate amount of protests are reported on when it happens. Look at what happens when a sports team has a major accomplishment. "Let's all get drunk and go burn something and break windows". That's not political, just human stupidity.
To your nephews...Thank them for their service and sacrifice. Very proud of them. A Purple Heart is not given out lightly. I hope that he is OK. My son and his wife are both Marines. My son was in Iraq for a short time and thankfully did not encounter any problems. My service was USAF stationed at a SAC base with B-52's and Atlas missiles. Although everyone wants to focus on the WMD problem, the AQ training camps were there and were being supported by the regime. Personally, if I were POTUS I would probably lie to the press and congress as long as I could, because they don't have the sense to KEEP THEIR MOUTHS SHUT on matters of national security. In WWII reporters were on the battlefield with the troops and knew enough to hold their stories until after the action was over.
Someone on TOTV has a quote by Mark Twain that I like, "If you don't read the papers, you're uninformed. If you do read the papers, you're mis-informed". If you're only exposed to one opinion or one side of an argument, you have no basis in fact to form your own opinion. How effective would our court system be if only the defense or prosecution were allowed to present their case? Given only one set of facts, a jury or judge would have a very hard time making an informed decision. As far as FOX being an 'arrm of the Republican Party', that seems to me to be a bit of a reach. In the NEWS segments, I see the stories being presented fairly straightforward without biased commentary. The OPINION shows on the other hand strongly lean conservative. There are liberals on the shows and they identify themselves from time to time. Stossel calls himself libertarian, Colmes is very liberal, Sean calls himself a conservative, Greta says she is liberal. Point being, no matter their leanings, they try to present both sides to the viewers, in the stories and the interviews. I am curious about the hour of Fox you watched. Was it a straight hour or hit and run during the day. Makes a difference on reaching an opinion.
Enough rambling for now and sorry to be so long-winded but I hate one-line 'zingers'. (except in jest)