Talk of The Villages Florida - Six points difference between the two worst candidates for president?

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)

- The Villages, Florida, Political talk (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/)

- - Six points difference between the two worst candidates for president? (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/six-points-difference-between-two-worst-candidates-president-159936/)

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1102018)

Women's rights and human rights are a foreign concept to most posters on this forum. If Hillary Clinton is able to pull this off and win the presidency, she will do something that no woman has been able to do in 241 years and finally break that glass ceiling.

Like Obama, Hilary would be the worst example in history. The worst first black president and the first worst female president. I am sure that Fiorina would be a better first female president, if we are in such a hurry that we need to have a first. I would rather we just had a good president, regardless of gender or ethnicity. Too bad the Democrats do not feel the same way.

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1102018)

Bruce Jenner would be a better candidate for your first......:1rotfl: At least he looks the part. :1rotfl:

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1102066)

Bruce Jenner would be a better candidate for your first......:1rotfl: At least he looks the part. :1rotfl:

Yes, Jenner would complete two tick marks on the "first" check list. First female president and first ????? tranny president. That would make the liberals heads explode because he is a Republican.

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1102018)

You are certainly impressed with yourself, aren't you ?

Were you on here protesting our new relations with Cuba, the most prolific violated of human rights ? No, you weren't

Were you on here protesting when children were gassed in the streets in Syria ? No, you weren't

Were you on here protesting when the President drew that red line with Syria on using chemical weapons ? No, you weren't

YOUR human rights are tied directly and totally to your political affiliation.

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1102018)

Women's rights and human rights are a foreign concept to most posters on this forum. If Hillary Clinton is able to pull this off and win the presidency, she will do something that no woman has been able to do in 241 years and finally break that glass ceiling.

You are concerned with women's rights, but don't give a s..t about children's rights....to live. Get off your high horse and think like an adult human, instead of a liberal college activist. You liberals are more concerned about "FIRSTS" than about how the country is being run. How many females are aborted every year. If you want to address women's rights, don't they count? You liberals are hypocrites.

Go ahead and talk about black rights too, all the while pushing abortion clinics that killed more black babies last year than were born. I don't hear you getting into an uproar over that. Once again, liberals are hypocrites.

Hilary Clinton does NOT represent the women of our country. She is an elitists snob that treats everyone as if they are beneath her. She cares only for herself. And as far as her being the first female president, you would be hard convincing anyone that she is anymore female than Bruce Jenner.