What is wrong with being a racist anymore?
Obama has shown that playing the race card must be OK.....he has done so continuously for 7 plus years and most of his life before coming out of the shadows of being unknown.

Hollywood uses racism as a matter of course.

Sharpton, Jackson, Obama (both of them) are the racial prime movers of the day.

So if they do it it is OK? And anybody else is called on it.

BS!

Baffling.
 

I am the OP of this thread, and if anyone will read my OP, you can see that there was NOTHING partisan in it. It was an idea given to me by a political scientist to keep track of what candidates say about each other BEFORE each party finally chooses a candidate, as those comments will disappear under the rug by then. That was all I was passing on. This point gets more and more relevant as the primary season continues. Can ANYONE address a non-partisan suggestion about a political process without becoming partisan themselves--and without deteriorating into insults and name calling?

Yes, I have received many resume's embellished with fluff and no substance. I can understand why you would vote for her, if you find her references to be that good. She should get together with Trump as a team, because they are both liars. Oh, that's right they have been together in the past. He has paid her quite a few times. It's a moot point anyway, because it's only a matter of time before she is taken out of the game. Might as well start concentrating on Sanders now, because it looks like he will have to carry on for Dem party. Nice to know that the Dem party is going to us a socialist to represent them. That should be good for a very few votes.

Felon? Elaborate or take a seat!

There are too many posts that explain that Hillary is a felon that it's not necessary to consume time explaining it to you. If you are not familiar with her crimes, then you are too uninformed to vote, because you are several years behind current events. You should be ashamed to admit that you do not even know your own candidate.

For example:

CAN IT BE ANY CLEARER?? « A Nation Beguiled

We expect the attack on the source.....but if you don't like this one there are just too many to ignore.

The only savings grace Clinton has, to date anyway, is the threat of implication of Obama and others.

Otherwise she would be behind bars just as quick as Petraeus was!

:agree:...:thumbup:

This seems more and more relevant as the campaigns continue....

I pay a lot of attention to what all the candidates say.
Do you think there is lying, twisting the truth and exaggerating this time more so then in any other past presidential election?

Nope, if their lips are moving they are definitely lying.

So why do you keep voting for them and not a 3rd party or independent? You KNOW they're liars yet you vote for them...why? To keep the other liar from getting elected? Vote for whom you WANT to win, not a liar that's place there for you!

I didn't write both posts. I don't believe everyone is lying all the time. I know the difference between a fact and an opinion.

I vote based on ideology. Not based on good looks, speaking ability, color or gender. I don't know you either, and you may be a serial liar. I don't vote for what the candidate offers me, either. I vote for the one that best seems to care about the condition of the country. AND, I am not foolish enough to throw my vote away on principle. Do you think that voting for Micky Mouse on principle means anything to anyone but you? NO. No one cares, and it will not stop one of two from being elected. Might as well vote for the lesser of two evils, or the best of the worst and hope for the best.

That's logical.

Can it be any clearer? Yes, it could be just clear away the political mud.
Petraeus prosecutor: Clinton committed no crime

Innocent until proven guilty. That isn't the law. It is only a suggestion.