Guest |
02-06-2016 05:18 AM |
Quote:
Posted by Guest
(Post 1182335)
Clinton is only relevant because of her husband's name. She is incompetent and lazy. She did nothing in congress and has proved her incompetency when she was SecState. She was appointed, not elected to the position as SecState by Obama to get her out of the way and to be able to crow about defeating her. I have looked but have found nothing of merit in her resume'. If that is the best that the Democrat party has to offer then they have not progressed, but regressed to the point of scraping the bottom of the rotten apple barrel.
|
Dear Guest: When you believe you are royalty well you tend to be complacent and lazy because you are special. And when you consider yourself to be royalty you just assume that you are smarter than everyone else; especially since no one will tell the empress she has no clothes.
I admit some confusion as to why Hillary wanted to be Secretary of State and why Obama agreed? Perhaps the simple truth is that Hillary wanted it to build her resume, which we now know she actually did more damage. Perhaps Obama recognized a woman scorned and felt it best to have her on the team to quiet her as an outside critic as he proceeded with his socialist agenda?
Hillary will never be brought to justice for her malfeasances because too many people in Washington DC are complicit in he many scandals that follow her. Life is not fair but when your rich and powerful you get to tell everyone else what is fair.
Personal Best Regards:
|